1 / 25

Subclinical Personality Traits

Subclinical Personality Traits. What are Subclinical Traits?. Personality scales used were not designed for detecting abnormal behavior by normal individuals (Hogan & Hogan, 2001) “Big Five” personality scales: e.g. NEO-PI, HPI, BFI

MartaAdara
Download Presentation

Subclinical Personality Traits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Subclinical Personality Traits

  2. What are Subclinical Traits? • Personality scales used were not designed for detecting abnormal behavior by normal individuals(Hogan & Hogan, 2001) • “Big Five” personality scales: • e.g. NEO-PI, HPI, BFI • Developed using normal populations in order to predict normal behaviours  the “Bright Side” • Clinical scales: • e.g. MMPI, PROFILE • Developed using abnormal populations in order to predict consistently abnormal functioning

  3. Abnormal Normal Level of Functioning What’s Being Assessed Normal – Factor 5 Clinical Variance Explained

  4. Subclinical Personality Traits: The Theory • Assessment tools needed that are designed specifically to predict deviant behaviours committed by otherwise normal individuals • Subclinical traits: • Usually derived from clinical scales • Designed to assess personality “quirks” in the normal population • Predict occasional maladaptive functioning  the “Dark Side”

  5. Subclinical Where do Subclinicals fit in? Normal – Factor 5 Clinical Variance Explained Abnormal Normal Level of Functioning

  6. Subclinical Traits in Practice • A wide variety of subclinical traits • Hogan’s HDS based on Axis 2 disorders in DSM-IV • Antisocial Personality Disorder => Mischievous • Borderline Personality Disorder => Excitable • Paranoid Personality Disorder => Skeptical • Narcissistic Personality Disorder => Bold • Dependent Personality Disorder => Dutiful • More typically use the Dark Triad: • Narcissism • MachiavellianismDark Triad • Psychopathy

  7. Measuring the Dark Triad • Machiavellianism: 20-item Mach-IV scale (Christie & Geis, 1970) - Affective Detachment, Intact Reality Contact, & Manipulativeness(McHoskey, Worzel, & Szarto, 1998) - Low Agreeableness, Low Conscientiousness(Paulhus & Williams, 2002) • Narcissism: 37-item Abridged Narcissistic Personality Inventory (ANPI) (Emmons, 1984) - Grandiosity, Entitlement, Dominance, & Superiority(Morf & Rhodewalt, 2001) - Low Agreeableness, High Extraversion, & High Openness to Experience (Paulhus & Williams, 2002) • Psychopathy: 31-item Self-Report Psychopathy (SRP-2) scale(Hare, 1985) - Unemotionality, Impulsivity, & Grandiosity(Anderson, Gustafson, Kerr, & Stattin, 2002) - High Extraversion, High Openness to Experience, Low Neuroticism, Low Agreeableness & Low Conscientiousness (Paulhus & Williams, 2002)

  8. Problem with Dark Triad • Each of the Dark Triad are considered multi-faceted constructs • High intercorrelations between the Dark Triad constructs • Need to be teased apart • Factor-analyses of adjectives used to describe each of the types performed simultaneously

  9. The Evil Eight • Subscales derived from means of items loading >.30 on a factor • Vain: 6 items, e.g. sexy,attractive,fashionable (α = .78) • Misanthropy: 12 items, e.g. vindictive,scheming,disdainful (α = .81) • Impulsive: 9 items, e.g. experimenting,rebellious,impulsive (α = .77) • Non-anxious: 5 items, e.g. nervous,guilty,worrisome (α = .69) • Arrogant: 4 items, e.g. humble,modest,arrogant (α = .64) • Dominant: 11 items, e.g. dominant,aggressive,persuasive (α = .84) • Immoral: 4 items, e.g. moral, ethical, idealistic (α = .60) • Dishonest: 6 items, e.g. honest, dishonest, honorable (α = .76)

  10. How do the Evil Eight Relate? • Subscales were correlated with each other and with original source scales to investigate whether to combine them back into higher-order factors

  11. Evil Eight Correlations: External

  12. Evil Eight Correlations: Internal

  13. Mini-ME Scales Narcissism .50 .15 Mach Psycho .14 Matching Patterns: Within Dark Triad Original Scales Narcissism .15 .46 Mach .42 Psycho

  14. Matching Patterns: Normal Personality Traits • Dark personality scales correlated with IPC-7 (Almagor, Tellegen, & Waller, 1995) • Big 5 with two evaluative dimensions

  15. Narcissism Scales

  16. Psychopathy

  17. Impact of Dark Personality on Reputation • Sampled at Univ. Illinois fraternities and sororities • Self-report and Peer-reports on Mini-ME for each member • Social Network Analysis: Each member rated every other member of the organization on three dimensions • How well do you know this person? • How well do you like this person? • How much influence does this person have?

  18. Correlations of Social Reputation Correlations on left are for self-ratings. Correlations on right are for peer-ratings

  19. Machiavellians in Other Studies: • Highly successful in contexts where short-term gains are important and getting caught doesn’t have long-term consequences • More likely to steal • Better at lying(keep straight face and control emotions) • Cheat in relationships • 10 Dollar Game: • 3 individuals: high, medium, & low machs • “Divide 10 between 2 of you” over 7 trials • Average outcome: High = $5.57 Medium = $3.14 Low= $1.29

  20. Narcissists in Other Studies: • Highly successful in short-term contexts where people are not able to evaluate exaggerated claims made about self, abilities, and history • Self-nominate for leadership positions • Typically have many, short-term romantic relationships • Women prefer jerks hypothesis • React to negative performance evaluations very poorly

  21. Narcissists in Other Studies: • Interview experiment: • Narcissists taped during job interview • Asked to rate performance in job interview • Narcs rated themselves more highly after reviewing tapes • T-shirt experiment: • Narcs prefer attention far more than others • Aggression experiment: • Narcs more aggressive • Extreme narcs want even negative attention

  22. Psychopaths • Def: - general inability to fully experience emotions, primarily anxiety • Syndrome (pattern of characteristics): • superficially charming • dishonest • unemotional, callous • norm-breakers • impulsive • Appearance: • Multiple tattoos • Multiple piercing • Problems: • perform extreme acts in order to feel anything • Repeated history of violent, anti-social acts (e.g. childhood pets)

  23. Psychopath Experiments • Experiment: Unemotional, Callous • Participants from welfare roles and prison populations • Presented with real and nonsense words and asked to make a decision if real or not • (eg. “table”, “butter”, “maim”, “kill”) • Measured for the amount of time to process • Results: • Normals show decreases in processing speed for emotionally charged words • Psychopaths show no difference in processing speed

  24. Psychopath Experiments • Experiment: Dishonest • Participants were Intro. Psych. students • Filled out personality questionnaires at beginning of semester • Seating positions secretly recorded • Computer program used to catch cheaters • Results: • three pairs of cheaters • all cheaters showed high scores for psychopathy

  25. Subclinicals: Wrap-up • It is true that subclinicals (and clinical) may relate to Big Five personality traits and may be easily mapped onto them • However, as a syndrome (pattern of traits), they may represent a specific flavor that is not easily detected or described with the Big Five

More Related