Back to Basics – Electronic Patient Registry Essentials - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

back to basics electronic patient registry essentials n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Back to Basics – Electronic Patient Registry Essentials PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Back to Basics – Electronic Patient Registry Essentials

play fullscreen
1 / 11
Back to Basics – Electronic Patient Registry Essentials
596 Views
Download Presentation
Leo
Download Presentation

Back to Basics – Electronic Patient Registry Essentials

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Back to Basics –Electronic Patient Registry Essentials Adam Baus MA, MPH West Virginia University Department of Community Medicine Office of Health Services Research National CDEMS Support Group Webinar 01/27/2010

  2. Special Thanks to Our Funders This presentation was supported by Grant/Cooperative Agreement Numbers U32/CCU322734, U59/CCU324180-03, U50/CCU321344 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  3. “If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.” ~Yogi Berra

  4. What has worked well? • Registry linked to QI plan • Part of a larger process (Care Model) • Team approach • Provider champion • Targeted measures • Avoids “bloat” • Data are evaluated, and then used • PDSA Cycle • Plan for growth • EMR/EHR implementation • Linking CDEMS to EMR/EHR data

  5. About Patient Registries - AHRQ • Understanding what a registry is and why they are useful is essential to success • Registries differ from EHRs / EMRs • STRENGTH in disease management / reporting • Available resource: “Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide” • Published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) • Handbook for creating, operating and evaluating registries • In simple terms: What are good registry practices? • Citation: Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, eds. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. (Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc. dba Outcome] under Contract No. HHSA29020050035ITO1.) AHRQ Publication No. 07-EHC001-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2007.

  6. Registries “Then and Now” 1974 – E.M. Brooke, in a 1974 publication of the World Health Organization, describes registries for health information as “a file of documents containing uniform information about individual persons, collected in a systematic and comprehensive way, in order to serve a predetermined purpose.” 2007 – AHRQ describes a patient registry as “an organized system that uses observational study methods to collect uniform data (clinical and other) to evaluate specified outcomes for a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that serves one or more predetermined scientific, clinical, or policy purposes.”

  7. Part 1: Registry Planning • Key Questions: • What’s the purpose of the registry? • Who are the stakeholders? • What’s the scope and target population? • Is it feasible? • The registry team and advisors should be selected based on expertise and experience. • Plan for registry governance and oversight • Data access • Publications • Change management (EMR use, someday)

  8. Part 2: Registry Design • Focus on the major purpose of the registry • Keep it practical, and achievable • Data elements: • What data elements are absolutely necessary? • Which are desirable but not essential? • Where can the data be found? • Are existing data available for import into your registry?

  9. Part 3: Registry Buy-In • Buy-in effects the overall quality of the data and whether or not the data are used • What are the goals? • What are the incentives? • California Clinics Receive Funding to Enhance Chronic Disease Care, Using Electronic Registries • From the California HealthCare Foundation:http://www.rwjf.org/qualityequality/digest.jsp?id=8002&c=EMC-ND142 • Online Registry Improves Diabetes Care in Kansas • From HealthCare IT News: http://www.nxtbook.com/nxtbooks/medtech/hitn0608/#/16 • WV FQHC received federal funding for CDEMS use

  10. Part 4: Data Collection & Quality Assurance • Quality data (and meeting your goals) depends on proper registry structure, data definitions, user training and problem solving • Points to consider: • Data collection • Data cleaning • Data storing • Data monitoring / reviewing • Reporting

  11. Contact Information Cecil Pollard, Director (304) 293-1080 cpollard@hsc.wvu.edu Trisha Petitte, Assistant Director, Health Improvement Consultant (304) 293-1084 tpetitte@hsc.wvu.edu Mary Swim, Applications Programmer, Technical Support (304) 293-1079 mswim@hsc.wvu.edu Adam Baus, Program Coordinator, Sr., Technical Support (304) 293-1083 abaus@hsc.wvu.edu Nell Stuart, Health Improvement Consultant (304) 276-3785 nstuart@hsc.wvu.edu Marie Gravely, Health Improvement Consultant (304) 482-6016 mgravely@hsc.wvu.edu Office website: wvuohsr.org