290 likes | 843 Views
New Mexico Airport System Plan Update 2009 2009 AVIATION DIVISION CONFERENCE NMASPU Review System Plan Update Economic Impact Update Land Use Review Asset Evaluation Update System Plan Tasks Goals and performance measure development Inventory of existing facilities
E N D
New Mexico AirportSystem Plan Update 2009 2009 AVIATION DIVISION CONFERENCE
NMASPU Review • System Plan Update • Economic Impact Update • Land Use Review • Asset Evaluation Update
System Plan Tasks • Goals and performance measure development • Inventory of existing facilities • Demand projections for aviation activity • Analysis of existing system’s performance • Future system needs determination • Recommended system development
Airport System Goals • Enhance Safety and Security • Preserve/Protect Investment in Airports • Accommodate Existing and Projected Aviation Demand • Support Economic Growth of the Community
New Mexico’s Airports… • 31 airports have multiple runways • Over 80% of study airports have a paved asphalt surface • Airports with full parallel taxiways increased to 51% from 45% since 2003 • 29 airports have on-site weather reporting (8 more since 2003) • 30 airports have instrument approaches; 10-precision & 20 non • 57% of airports provide Jet A and AvGas fuel service • Aside from Albuquerque International Sunport; Four Corners Regional, Double Eagle II, and Las Cruces International each reported more than 100,000 annual aircraft operations
Airport Role Analysis • Updated since 2003 study • Used quantitative process to evaluate each airport’s role in the statewide system • Considers aviation and non-aviation factors • Uses FAA ARC system but is New Mexico-specific • Provides baseline for evaluating minimum facility needs
Roles Primary – 3 Non-Primary - 2 Limited Comm’l - 4 Regional GA - 13 Community GA - 18 Low Activity GA - 11
System Performance • 29 performance measures evaluated (existing and future) • Many provide updates on performance improvements since 2003 • Evaluates how current airport system meets needs • Some performance measures are action-oriented, others are informational • Used to determine where changes in the system are needed to improve performance
Economic Impact Update • Update from 2003 analysis • Identifiable & quantifiable benefits of airports • Uses FAA methodology and airport-specific data • Airport interviews, surveys, phone calls, data searches • Provides airport-specific impacts
+ = Second Round Impacts Total Impacts First-Round Impacts Methodology re-spending of direct impacts • First-Round • Direct: • On-Airport Business • Partners: • Aerospace • Air Cargo • Airlines • Construction • Manufacturing • Military • Indirect: • Visitors TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS Multiplier Effect recirculation of indirect impacts
Other Economic Data • $57M in state GRT from visitors; $20M in local GRT from visitors • Comprises 4% of NM’s estimated 2007 Gross Domestic Product • 93% of the respondents use commercial airline service for business • 32% percent have customers/suppliers that use general aviation airports
Land Use Review • Uses Airport Influence Areas as basis for review • AIA based on Part 77 surfaces and RPZs • Preparation of diagram for each airport (except ABQ) for use • Provides starting point for airports in considering land use protection
No Development Area • Includes land along each runway • Development should be strictly controlled and limited to on-airport developments, and be closely coordinated • Height of any proposed development in area should be reviewed through the Part 77 process • Noise sensitive land uses such as residences, churches, schools, or hospitals, should not be developed n this area • Typically industrial, commercial, or transportation related • Potential wildlife attractants or that have emissions that could be a visual hazard should be screened • Avigation easements are strongly recommended in this area if non-aviation development is proposed
Limited Development Area • Includes training routes and extended approach and departure paths • Likely to experience overflights and the associated operational noise • For safety and quality of life reasons, noise sensitive or accommodate significant groups of people should be limited in this area • Avigation easements are encouraged within this area • Notification should be required of property owners or potential buyers that the property falls in area • Tall structures should be submitted under the Part 77 airspace review process
Controlled Development Area • Extends to the outer boundary of the Part 77 defined horizontal surface • Experience aircraft overflights, however, at heights greater than others, less noise • All land use categories are allowable within this area with residential development having the lowest density possible • Notification should be required of property owners or potential buyers that the property falls in area • Tall structures should be submitted under the Part 77 airspace review process
Asset Evaluation Update • Estimated value of each airport developed based on current costs (not ABQ) • Value includes land, buildings, pavement and “ARC airport size adjustment” • Update of 2005 analysis and inflated to 2008 dollars • 2008 value is $1.7 billion to reconstruct airports • Increase of $140 million since 2005 • Average value is $18 million
Final Products • Technical report (hard copy & CDs) • Executive summary • Individual airport brochures (summarize economic impact, land use drawing, asset evaluation, funding needs)
Thank You! Pam Keidel-Adams Wilbur Smith Associates (480)477-8651