Cross section for potential scattering
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
In a practical scattering situation we have a finite acceptance for a detector with a solid angle DW. There is a range of momenta which are allowed by kinematics which can contribute to the cross section. The cross section for scattering into DW is then obtained as an integral over all the allowed momenta for that solid angle. In the case of potential scattering we will assume only elastic scattering is allowed. This means that there is a change in momentum between the incoming particle and outgoing particle. We are using periodic boundary conditions, or box normalization, ( see ref. 2) for which the incoming and outgoing states are plane wave states. The incoming wave |a> is
All possible outgoing states |b> which can be accepted by the solid angle must be included in the summation.
We next substitute the matrix element into the above equation. This will be an integral over all relevant degrees of freedom needed to describe the states a and b. For a position dependent interaction and the plane waves above, the integration is over configuration space.
But we will consider only potentials diagonal ( local) in configuration space.
Notice that the matrix element is proportional to the Fourier transform of the potential.
In eqn (17) we note the sum over possible n values. The smallest change possible in n is dn = 1. We want to convert the sum in (17) into an integral over wave numbers.
And from eqns (15) we realize that
Note that in the delta function in (20) we have functions ( the energies) of the momenta k, whereas the variable of integration is k. We use the following property of functions of the delta function.
In the case of potential scattering, or elastic scattering, the zeroes occur for
k = kb = ka . The derivative of the energy with respect to the wave number k is
Integrating over k, the delta function selects the value k = ka which we will simply call k, the magnitude of the initial wave number. Thus,
We are now in a position to evaluate the differential elastic cross section using eqn (21) for any potential V. We will need to find the Fourier transform of the potential as a function of q. Bear in mind that (21) is an approximation using only the first non diagonal element of the S-matrix.
Consider the Coulomb scattering cross section. The classical cross section was calculated by Rutherford and was very important in determining the existence of the atomic nucleus. If we perform the integration for f(q) given in eqn (21) using the Coulomb potential we will end up with an indefinite result. In order to obtain a definite result we use a screened potential with a parameter e to evaluate the integral and then let e go to zero. It is plausible in a real scattering situation to use a screened potential because in a typical scattering experiment the atomic electrons surrounding the nucleus screen the Coulomb potential of the nucleus so that at large distance the incoming projectile actually feels no force. The atom as a whole is electrically neutral. Nevertheless, the real reason to use a screened potential is that it allows us to calculate a quantum mechanical cross section.
In these expressions z1 and z2 are the atomic numbers of the incident projectile and target, e is the charge on the electron. We can choose q as the z-axis and then (q,f) are the polar angles of r with respect to the q direction.
Let cos(q) = x, then
From the diagram on page 3,
Equation (22) turns out to be correct for spin zero relativistic Coulomb scattering too. The use of relativistic wave functions does not change the result. For the case of spin ½ particles there is an additional factor. Eqn, (22) reduces to the Rutherford cross section in the non-relativistic limit.
Equation (22) gives us the Coulomb scattering from an infinitely massive point charge. In a real situation, such as scattering of an electron off a nuclear charge distribution, we must consider how the charge is distributed to arrive at the cross section. Let us consider the case of a spherically symmetric charge distribution of density r(r) for a nucleus with total charge Q2. The potential V(r)
Is given by ( see ref. 3 )
The first integral was evaluated earlier for a point charge target. We call this integral f0(q). The second integral over the charge density is called the charge form factor F(q).
Let’s consider the case of a uniformly charged sphere. This is a rough approximation to nuclei. It fails in the details but gives us insight into important qualitative features of scattering.
This is a sphere of radius R and total charge Q2 .
Equation (23) describes Coulomb scattering from an extended charge distribution. We see that |F(q)|<= 1 and reaches the value of 1 at q=0, F(0)=1. It also introduces an additional fall off with respect to q by a factor of about 1/q2 for large q. This is a general feature we expect from quantum mechanics. As the region of interaction becomes larger the ability of the interaction to impart large momentum transfers decreases. Large momenta are associated with small distances, small momenta are associated with large distances. If we compare, for example, elastic scattering of electrons from 3He with elastic scattering from 12C we see that there is a steeper q dependence for the larger nucleus. We also notice from F(q) that there are values of q for which F(q) = 0. This produces an oscillatory behavior which is absent in the point charge cross section.
The charge form factor for this distribution is
A commonly employed model for the proton charge distribution uses the exponential dependence with l = 4.35 F-1 . So far we have considered spinless projectiles. The case of an electron on a spinless point target includes the additional factor below. The point cross section is the same as in eqn 22.
We have neglected magnetic interactions in the above. If the target has spin then the incoming electron can interact magnetically with the magnetization density in the target. This introduces another form factor, the magnetic form factor.
(2) “Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory”, Franz Gross, John Wiley & Sons, 1993
(3) “Nuclei and Particles”, second edition, Emilio Segre’,W. A. Benjamin, 1977, chapters 6, 18