The Nature and Role of Theory in Scientific Research Lecture by Dr. Charles R. Hildreth Palmer School of Library and Information Science September 7, 2006 The primary goal of science is to formulate and affirm theories that enhance our
Related searches for The Nature and Role of Theory in Scientific Research Lecture by Dr. Charles R. Hildreth Palmer School of Library and Inf
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Dr. Charles R. Hildreth
Palmer School of Library and Information Science
September 7, 2006
The primary goal of science is to formulate and affirm theories that enhance our
understanding of the social and natural worlds in which we live.” (CRH)
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ?
SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ?
Gather Empirical Data
Report Data Findings
(Does this sum it up?)
1. Not mere information gathering (At the library,
in the encyclopedia, on the Internet)
2. Not mere observation, however precise
3. Not transporting known facts via a paper
4. Not rummaging through files and archives for information
5. Not a propaganda word to support unscientific claims
All those involved with science teaching and learning should have a common, accurate view of the nature of science. Science is characterized by the systematic gathering of information through various forms of direct and indirect observations and the testing of this information by methods including, but not limited to, experimentation. The principal product of science is knowledge in the form of naturalistic concepts and the laws and theories related to those concepts.(www.nsta.org)
A science, from the Latin, scire, to know, is a body of knowledge that is constructed via observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and logic for the purpose of explaining and predicting events or behavior. Observation, experimentation and critical reasoning all play crucial roles in the advancement of scientific knowledge. A discipline is widely regarded as a science if its practitioners apply the 'scientific method'. According to falsificationists, this involves the formation of a testablehypothesis, followed by ongoing attempts to refute this hypothesis via critical reasoning, experimentation and observation. A hypothesis that has been rigorously tested under a wide variety of conditions, and which remains unrefuted, is tentatively accepted as a useful approximation to the truth, and attains the status of theory; future observations may yet refute it.
- a vague and fuzzy sort of fact
- a mere quess or hunch as to why something happens
- tentative, uncertain, unproven
- an explanation of a natural phenomenon built up logically
from numerous testable observations and well-tested
- a well-established, broadly accepted complex of ideas that
explain a particular phenomenon
“Research is the systematic process of collecting and analyzing information (data) in order to increase our understanding of the phenomenon about which we are concerned or interested.” (Leedy & Ormrod, 2001)
Research requires a clear articulation of a goal.
Research follows a specific plan of procedure.
Research divides the problem into sub-problems.
Research is guided by the specific research problem, question, or hypothesis.
Research accepts certain critical assumptions.
Research requires the collection and interpretation of data in an attempt to resolve the problem that initiated the research.
Research is, by its nature, cyclical, or helical.
A Series of Logical Steps?
1. State the problem
2. Formulate the hypothesis
3. Design the survey or experiment
4. Make observations/collect data
5. Interpret the data
6. Draw conclusions
7. Suggest additional research
“The scientific method is really a series of intellectual steps. It is not so much the actual techniques whereby the research is performed as it is the thought process whereby hypotheses are formed, tested, and verified (or not verified).” (Sirkin, 1995)
The “What, Where, How often, How much” questions
are typical. Data collected is usually quantitative data.
Measurement, sampling, and accurate data reporting
are key concerns here. Valid and reliable observational
and measurement instruments and techniques are
“What is going on here?” Search for meaning in actions
and activities. Attempts to dig deeper than surface facts,
to discover possible interpretations or explanations. Key
is investigating without being influenced by
preconceptions or expectations. Frequently involves
qualitative methods and qualitative data.
Aims to identify causes and effects of phenomena that will
explain behavior or selected phenomena with a high
degree of probability, and support predictions about this
behavior or phenomena. To establish “causal
connections” between variables, experiments and/or
surveys, that is, quantitative methods, are used.
Like, explanatory research, deals with effects and their
causes. But, typically investigates the implementation
of and actual effects of social, political, or educational
programs and policies.
Surveys (questionnaires, polls, interviews)
Experiments (laboratory, field)
Monitoring, obtrusive and unobtrusive
(computer logging, video)
Historical research and data mining
Focus group interviews
Verbal protocol analysis
Grounded theory research
Empirical Data Facts
“A hypothesis is a logical supposition, a reasonable guess, an educated conjecture. It provides a tentative explanation for a phenomenon under investigation.” (Leedy)
“To scientists, the phrase "the theory of ..." signals a particularly well-tested idea. A hypothesis is an idea or suggestion that has been put forward to explain a set of observations.” (http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/modeltheory.html)
“A hypothesis is a tentative theory that has not yet been tested. Typically, a scientist devises a hypothesis and then sees if it "holds water" by testing it against available data. If the hypothesis does hold water, the scientist declares it to be a theory.”
“Hypothesis: This is an educated guess based upon observation. It is a rational explanation of a single event or phenomenon based upon what is observed, but which has not been proved. Most hypotheses can be supported or refuted by experimentation or continued observation.” (http://wilstar.com/theories.htm)
“Over time, as particular hypotheses are supported by a growing body of data, they evolve into theories. A theory is an organized body of concepts and principles intended to explain a particular phenomenon.”
“Today, any set of scientific ideas referred to as "the theory of ..." is a well-tested and well-established understanding of an underlying mechanism or process. Such a theory can never be proved to be complete and final -- that is why we no longer call it a "law."
“A theory is a scientific explanation of an observed phenomenon. Unlike laws, theories actually explain why things are the way they are. Theories are what science is for.”
“Well evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts.” (Stephen J. Gould)
“In popular usage, a theory is just a vague and fuzzy sort of fact. But to a scientist a theory is a conceptual framework that explains existing facts and predicts new ones.”
“Theory: A theory is more like a scientific law than a hypothesis. A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or events based upon proven hypotheses and verified multiple times by detached groups of researchers. One scientist cannot create a theory; he can only create a hypothesis.” (http://wilstar.com/theories.htm)
“An explanation for an observation or series of observations that is substantiated by a considerable body of evidence” (Krimsley, 1995). “… a law describes what nature does under certain conditions, and will predict what will happen as long as those conditions are met. A theory explains how nature works.” (http://science.kennesaw.edu/~rmatson/Biol%203380/3380theory.html)
Wickipedia on “Theory” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory)
In common usage a theory is often viewed as little more than a guess or a hypothesis. But in science and generally in academic usage, a theory is much more than that. A theory is an established paradigm that explains all or much of the data we have and offers valid predictions that can be tested. In science, a theory is never considered fact or infallible, because we can never assume we know all there is to know. Instead, theories remain standing until they are disproven, at which point they are thrown out altogether or modified to fit the additional data.
Theories start out with empirical observations such as “sometimes water turns into ice.” At some point, there is a need or curiosity to find out why this is, which leads to a theoretical/scientific phase. In scientific theories, this then leads to research, in combination with auxiliary and other hypotheses (see scientific method), which may then eventually lead to a theory. Some scientific theories (such as the theory of gravity) are so widely accepted that they are often seen as laws. This, however, rests on a mistaken assumption of what theories and laws are. Theories and laws are not rungs in a ladder of truth, but different sets of data. A law is a general statement based on observations.
“A scientific law is a description of an observed phenomenon. Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion are a good example. Those laws describe the motions of planets. But they do not explain why they are that way. If all scientists ever did was to formulate scientific laws, then the universe would be very well-described, but still unexplained and very mysterious.” (http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Temple/9917/evolution/theory.html)
“Scientific Law: This is a statement of fact meant to explain, in concise terms, an action or set of actions. It is generally accepted to be true and universal, and can sometimes be expressed in terms of a single mathematical equation. Scientific laws are similar to mathematical postulates. They don’t really need any complex external proofs; they are accepted at face value based upon the fact that they have always been observed to be true.” (http://wilstar.com/theories.htm)
“A set of observed regularities expressed in a concise verbal or mathematical statement.” (Krimsley, 1995).
“Regardless of which definitions one uses to distinguish between a law and a theory, scientists would agree that a theory is NOT a "transitory law, a law in waiting". There is NO hierarchy being implied by scientists who use these words. That is, a law is neither "better than" nor "above" a theory. From this view, laws and theories "do" different things and have different roles to play in science.” (http://science.kennesaw.edu/~rmatson/Biol%203380/3380theory.html)
Newton's theory of gravity
Newton’s “laws” of motion
The theory of evolution by natural selection
Einstein's theory of gravity
Einstein’s theories of general and specific relativity
Mendel's law of inheritance
A chaos theory
Early psychoanalytic theory
Geology: Plate Tectonics
The big bang
The Jungian theory of the unconscious mind
Germ theory of disease
Rational choice theory
Genetic theories of intelligence or personality
(See also: http://www.radix.net/~bobg/timeline/theories.html)
Aid data interpretation
“Theories do not provide the answers to the questions we pose as topics for research. Instead, theories suggest the areas on which we should focus and the propositions (hypotheses) we should consider for a test.” (Schutt, 2001)
Falsifiability: Always tentative, never final, absolute
The product of insight that produces questions more than answers
(Diagram from Schutt, 2001, p. 39)
Research, explicitly or implicitly, attempts to connect theory with empirical data. This may involve starting with a theory-inspired hypothesis and then testing it in empirical research such as an experiment. This is the process of “deductive research.”
Alternatively, the connection between theory and data may be suggested by careful observations followed by empirical generalizations that lead to the development of a theory that explains characteristics or patterns observed in the data. This is the process of “inductive research.”