The Nature and Role of Theory in Scientific Research
Download
1 / 29

The Nature and Role of Theory in Scientific Research Lecture by Dr. Charles R. Hildreth Palmer School of Library and Inf - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 298 Views
  • Updated On :

The Nature and Role of Theory in Scientific Research Lecture by Dr. Charles R. Hildreth Palmer School of Library and Information Science September 7, 2006 The primary goal of science is to formulate and affirm theories that enhance our

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Nature and Role of Theory in Scientific Research Lecture by Dr. Charles R. Hildreth Palmer School of Library and Inf' - Audrey


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

The Nature and Role of Theory in Scientific Research

Lecture by

Dr. Charles R. Hildreth

Palmer School of Library and Information Science

September 7, 2006

The primary goal of science is to formulate and affirm theories that enhance our

understanding of the social and natural worlds in which we live.” (CRH)


Slide2 l.jpg

SCIENCE ?

RESEARCH ?

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ?

(The Process/Method)

SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE ?


Slide3 l.jpg

SCIENCE AS DATA GATHERING ?

Observe/Look About

 Measure

Gather Empirical Data

Report Data Findings

(Does this sum it up?)


Slide4 l.jpg

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IS NOT:

1. Not mere information gathering (At the library,

in the encyclopedia, on the Internet)

2. Not mere observation, however precise

3. Not transporting known facts via a paper

4. Not rummaging through files and archives for information

5. Not a propaganda word to support unscientific claims


Slide5 l.jpg

SCIENCE, A WAY OF KNOWING

Preamble

All those involved with science teaching and learning should have a common, accurate view of the nature of science. Science is characterized by the systematic gathering of information through various forms of direct and indirect observations and the testing of this information by methods including, but not limited to, experimentation. The principal product of science is knowledge in the form of naturalistic concepts and the laws and theories related to those concepts.(www.nsta.org)


Slide6 l.jpg

A science, from the Latin, scire, to know, is a body of knowledge that is constructed via observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and logic for the purpose of explaining and predicting events or behavior. Observation, experimentation and critical reasoning all play crucial roles in the advancement of scientific knowledge. A discipline is widely regarded as a science if its practitioners apply the 'scientific method'. According to falsificationists, this involves the formation of a testablehypothesis, followed by ongoing attempts to refute this hypothesis via critical reasoning, experimentation and observation. A hypothesis that has been rigorously tested under a wide variety of conditions, and which remains unrefuted, is tentatively accepted as a useful approximation to the truth, and attains the status of theory; future observations may yet refute it.

Wikipedia.org


Slide7 l.jpg

“THEORY”

Popular Usage:

       - a vague and fuzzy sort of fact

       - a mere quess or hunch as to why something happens

       - tentative, uncertain, unproven

Scientific Usage:

      - an explanation of a natural phenomenon built up logically

from numerous testable observations and well-tested

hypotheses

      - a well-established, broadly accepted complex of ideas that

explain a particular phenomenon


Slide8 l.jpg

WHAT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IS: (DISTINGUISHING FEATURES)

“Research is the systematic process of collecting and analyzing information (data) in order to increase our understanding of the phenomenon about which we are concerned or interested.” (Leedy & Ormrod, 2001)


Slide9 l.jpg

Research originates with a question or problem.

Research requires a clear articulation of a goal.

Research follows a specific plan of procedure.

Research divides the problem into sub-problems.

Research is guided by the specific research problem, question, or hypothesis.

Research accepts certain critical assumptions.

Research requires the collection and interpretation of data in an attempt to resolve the problem that initiated the research.

Research is, by its nature, cyclical, or helical.


Slide11 l.jpg

THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD

“Little Science”

A Series of Logical Steps?

1.   State the problem

2.   Formulate the hypothesis

3.   Design the survey or experiment

4.   Make observations/collect data

5.   Interpret the data

6.   Draw conclusions

7.   Suggest additional research

“The scientific method is really a series of intellectual steps. It is not so much the actual techniques whereby the research is performed as it is the thought process whereby hypotheses are formed, tested, and verified (or not verified).” (Sirkin, 1995)


Slide12 l.jpg

RESEARCH AIMS & APPROACHES

Descriptive Research

Exploratory/Inductive Research

Explanatory Research

Evaluation Research


Slide13 l.jpg

RESEARCH AIMS & APPROACHES

Descriptive Research

The “What, Where, How often, How much” questions

are typical. Data collected is usually quantitative data.

Measurement, sampling, and accurate data reporting

are key concerns here. Valid and reliable observational

and measurement instruments and techniques are

critical.

Exploratory/Inductive Research

“What is going on here?” Search for meaning in actions

and activities. Attempts to dig deeper than surface facts,

to discover possible interpretations or explanations. Key

is investigating without being influenced by

preconceptions or expectations. Frequently involves

qualitative methods and qualitative data.


Slide14 l.jpg

RESEARCH AIMS & APPROACHES

Explanatory Research

Aims to identify causes and effects of phenomena that will

explain behavior or selected phenomena with a high

degree of probability, and support predictions about this

behavior or phenomena. To establish “causal

connections” between variables, experiments and/or

surveys, that is, quantitative methods, are used.

Evaluation Research

Like, explanatory research, deals with effects and their

causes. But, typically investigates the implementation

of and actual effects of social, political, or educational

programs and policies.


Slide15 l.jpg

RESEARCH & DATA COLLECTION METHODS

QUANTITATIVE

Surveys (questionnaires, polls, interviews)

Experiments (laboratory, field)

Monitoring, obtrusive and unobtrusive

(computer logging, video)

Historical research and data mining


Slide16 l.jpg

RESEARCH & DATA COLLECTION METHODS

QUALITATIVE

Case studies

Participant observation

Intensive interviewing

Focus group interviews

Verbal protocol analysis

Ethnography

Phenomenological research

Grounded theory research


Slide17 l.jpg

KINDS OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE

Empirical Data Facts

Hypotheses

Theories

“Laws”


Slide18 l.jpg

KEY DEFINITIONS-1

Hypothesis:

“A hypothesis is a logical supposition, a reasonable guess, an educated conjecture. It provides a tentative explanation for a phenomenon under investigation.” (Leedy)

“To scientists, the phrase "the theory of ..." signals a particularly well-tested idea. A hypothesis is an idea or suggestion that has been put forward to explain a set of observations.” (http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/modeltheory.html)

“A hypothesis is a tentative theory that has not yet been tested. Typically, a scientist devises a hypothesis and then sees if it "holds water" by testing it against available data. If the hypothesis does hold water, the scientist declares it to be a theory.”

(http://home.xnet.com/~blatura/skep_1.html)

“Hypothesis: This is an educated guess based upon observation. It is a rational explanation of a single event or phenomenon based upon what is observed, but which has not been proved. Most hypotheses can be supported or refuted by experimentation or continued observation.” (http://wilstar.com/theories.htm)


Slide19 l.jpg

KEY DEFINITIONS-2

Theory:

 “Over time, as particular hypotheses are supported by a growing body of data, they evolve into theories. A theory is an organized body of concepts and principles intended to explain a particular phenomenon.”

 “Today, any set of scientific ideas referred to as "the theory of ..." is a well-tested and well-established understanding of an underlying mechanism or process. Such a theory can never be proved to be complete and final -- that is why we no longer call it a "law."

(http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/theory/modeltheory.html)

  “A theory is a scientific explanation of an observed phenomenon. Unlike laws, theories actually explain why things are the way they are. Theories are what science is for.”

(http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Temple/9917/evolution/theory.html)

 “Well evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts.” (Stephen J. Gould)

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html


Slide20 l.jpg

Theory (continued):

 “In popular usage, a theory is just a vague and fuzzy sort of fact. But to a scientist a theory is a conceptual framework that explains existing facts and predicts new ones.”

(http://home.xnet.com/~blatura/skep_1.html)

  “Theory: A theory is more like a scientific law than a hypothesis. A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or events based upon proven hypotheses and verified multiple times by detached groups of researchers. One scientist cannot create a theory; he can only create a hypothesis.” (http://wilstar.com/theories.htm)

 “An explanation for an observation or series of observations that is substantiated by a considerable body of evidence” (Krimsley, 1995). “… a law describes what nature does under certain conditions, and will predict what will happen as long as those conditions are met. A theory explains how nature works.” (http://science.kennesaw.edu/~rmatson/Biol%203380/3380theory.html)


Slide21 l.jpg

Wickipedia on “Theory” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory)

In common usage a theory is often viewed as little more than a guess or a hypothesis. But in science and generally in academic usage, a theory is much more than that. A theory is an established paradigm that explains all or much of the data we have and offers valid predictions that can be tested. In science, a theory is never considered fact or infallible, because we can never assume we know all there is to know. Instead, theories remain standing until they are disproven, at which point they are thrown out altogether or modified to fit the additional data.


Slide22 l.jpg

Wickipedia on “Theory” (Cont.)

Theories start out with empirical observations such as “sometimes water turns into ice.” At some point, there is a need or curiosity to find out why this is, which leads to a theoretical/scientific phase. In scientific theories, this then leads to research, in combination with auxiliary and other hypotheses (see scientific method), which may then eventually lead to a theory. Some scientific theories (such as the theory of gravity) are so widely accepted that they are often seen as laws. This, however, rests on a mistaken assumption of what theories and laws are. Theories and laws are not rungs in a ladder of truth, but different sets of data. A law is a general statement based on observations.


Slide23 l.jpg

KEY DEFINITIONS-3

Laws:

 “A scientific law is a description of an observed phenomenon. Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion are a good example. Those laws describe the motions of planets. But they do not explain why they are that way. If all scientists ever did was to formulate scientific laws, then the universe would be very well-described, but still unexplained and very mysterious.” (http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/Temple/9917/evolution/theory.html)

 “Scientific Law: This is a statement of fact meant to explain, in concise terms, an action or set of actions. It is generally accepted to be true and universal, and can sometimes be expressed in terms of a single mathematical equation. Scientific laws are similar to mathematical postulates. They don’t really need any complex external proofs; they are accepted at face value based upon the fact that they have always been observed to be true.” (http://wilstar.com/theories.htm)

  “A set of observed regularities expressed in a concise verbal or mathematical statement.” (Krimsley, 1995).

 “Regardless of which definitions one uses to distinguish between a law and a theory, scientists would agree that a theory is NOT a "transitory law, a law in waiting". There is NO hierarchy being implied by scientists who use these words. That is, a law is neither "better than" nor "above" a theory. From this view, laws and theories "do" different things and have different roles to play in science.” (http://science.kennesaw.edu/~rmatson/Biol%203380/3380theory.html)


Slide24 l.jpg

EXAMPLES OF SCIENTIFIC THEORIES

Newton's theory of gravity

Newton’s “laws” of motion

The theory of evolution by natural selection

Einstein's theory of gravity

Einstein’s theories of general and specific relativity

Mendel's law of inheritance

A chaos theory

Pythagoras's theorem

Early psychoanalytic theory

Geology: Plate Tectonics

The big bang

The Jungian theory of the unconscious mind

Germ theory of disease

Rational choice theory

Deterrence theory

Genetic theories of intelligence or personality

(See also: http://www.radix.net/~bobg/timeline/theories.html)


Slide25 l.jpg

ROLES OF THEORY IN SCIENCE

 Explanatory

Predictive

Generative

 Stimulate research

Guide research

Aid data interpretation

 “Theories do not provide the answers to the questions we pose as topics for research. Instead, theories suggest the areas on which we should focus and the propositions (hypotheses) we should consider for a test.” (Schutt, 2001)

 Falsifiability: Always tentative, never final, absolute

 The product of insight that produces questions more than answers


Slide26 l.jpg

INDUCTIVE & DEDUCTIVE RESEARCH STRATEGIES

(Diagram from Schutt, 2001, p. 39)


Slide27 l.jpg

INDUCTIVE & DEDUCTIVE RESEARCH STRATEGIES

Research, explicitly or implicitly, attempts to connect theory with empirical data. This may involve starting with a theory-inspired hypothesis and then testing it in empirical research such as an experiment. This is the process of “deductive research.”

Alternatively, the connection between theory and data may be suggested by careful observations followed by empirical generalizations that lead to the development of a theory that explains characteristics or patterns observed in the data. This is the process of “inductive research.”