illiberal vs liberal democracy l.
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Illiberal vs. Liberal Democracy

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 8

Illiberal vs. Liberal Democracy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Illiberal vs. Liberal Democracy. Fareed Zakaria. Zakaria’s Points. There has been a recent “wave” of global democratization 188 of the world’s 193 countries are “democratic” 54% of the world’s population now live under a democratic form of government

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Illiberal vs. Liberal Democracy' - Anita

Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
zakaria s points
Zakaria’s Points
  • There has been a recent “wave” of global democratization
    • 188 of the world’s 193 countries are “democratic”
    • 54% of the world’s population now live under a democratic form of government
  • There is a problem with this “wave of democratization” however…..
    • 50% of these democratizing nations rank higher on Freedom House’s ‘political liberties” index than they do on its civil liberties” index. Consequently, they rank as “illiberal” democracies.
zakaria s points3
Zakaria’s Points
  • These countries are moving rapidly toward incorporating even more illiberal features (less institutional protections of civil liberties)
  • Fukuyama’s conclusion that Western Liberalism has triumphed is premature. Liberal democracy is but one of several democratic models that may develop. Illiberal democracy represents an alternative model.
zakaria s points4
Zakaria’s Points
  • Illiberal Democracy:
    • Process:
      • Competitive Multiparty Elections
  • Liberal Democracy:
    • Free, Open, and Fair Elections
      • No coercive state structures
      • Universal Suffrage
      • Laws that maintain competitive rules for all parties
zakaria s points5
Zakaria’s Points
  • Freedom of the Press
  • Public Space for Debate
  • Popular Sovereignty (the “people” are the original source of authority via granting their consent to be governed by a representative legislature (this infers a social contract)
  • Majority Rule Balanced with Minority Rights
  • Limited Government
  • Institutional Checks and Balances
  • The Rule of Law (this includes political processes)
  • Tolerance (Pluralism). This includes freedom of religion and of speech.
  • Individual Political and Economic Rights
  • A conception of Natural Law (or at least some objective source of rights)
zakaria s points6
Zakaria’s Points
  • Examples of Democracies with Illiberal Features:
    • Unitary, non-constitutional, communitarian, democracies such as:
      • Sweden: highly communitarian….restrictive of individual property rights
      • France: State media monopoly
      • England: An established state religion
      • The United States before universal suffrage was achieved
  • Liberalism comes from different sources than does democratic process:
    • Philosophy:
      • Greek philosophy (Socrates, Plato, Aristotle)
      • Roman republicanism
      • Hobbes
      • Locke
      • Madison
    • Non-democratic political actors:
      • British Lords at Runnymede (Magna Carta) brought about the republican legislatures of Great Britain (House of Lords and House of Commons))
zakaria s points7
Zakaria’s Points
  • Many countries developed into “liberal” nations before they ever incorporated democratic features.
  • After WWII, many East Asian countries turned toward authoritarianism. Each moved however, over time, from autocracies to “liberalizing autocracies” and, in some cases, “liberalizing semi-democracies”.
  • Constitutional liberalism, therefore, leads to democracy. Democracy (or merely democratic process), on the other hand, does not seem to lead to constitutional liberalism.
zakaria s points8
Zakaria’s Points
  • Constitutional Liberalism focuses on limiting the scope of government power.
  • Democracy focuses on increasing the scope of government power (as a tool to achieve the objectives of the “will of the electorate”)
  • In authoritarian regimes “transitioning” toward democracy, executive leaders elected through the democratic process (with no provisions for protection of the minority perspective) act as if they have “mandates” from the people to “usurp” legislative authority and codify traditional ethnic rivalries and animosities.
  • This leads back to authoritarianism and the traditional conflicts that typified the pre-democratic state.