1 / 22

an algorithmic approach to ugi bleeding

Albert_Lan
Download Presentation

an algorithmic approach to ugi bleeding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. An Algorithmic Approach to UGI Bleeding Glenn M. Eisen, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53(7): 853-859 presented by Ri???

    2. UGI Bleeding A common medical presentation Endoscopy: an important early intervention Early endoscopy: Reduce adverse outcomes Choose appropriate care to prevent rebleeding Lee JG, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50(6): 755-61

    3. Initial evaluation (1) Possible etiology of bleeding Peptic ulcer, Mallory-Weiss tears, esophagitis, esophageal/gastric varices Morbidity/mortality associated with varices: still high, need timely therapeutic intervention Complicating factors Age, use of anticoagulants, coagulatory diseases, NASID use

    4. Initial evaluation (2) Source of bleeding: upper or lower NG tube: help in identifying the source Lavage: allow the stomach to be cleared of blood Extent of blood loss Orthostatic changes in BP: significant volume depletion, need prompt resuscitation

    5. Management Acid suppression therapy Pre-endoscopy risk assessment Endoscopy Actively bleeding ulcers, ulcers with nonbleeding visible ulcers

    6. Acid Suppression Therapy (1) IV H2 blocker alone: no significant improvement on short-term outcomes, e.g. rebleeding rates Collins R, et al. NEJM, 1985; 313: 660-6 Maintenance use of H2 blocker after ulcer healing: long-term rebleeding rates are reduced. Jensen DM, et al. NEJM, 1994; 330(6): 382-6 Successful H. pylori eradication: reduce long-term rebleeding rates Laine LA. Am J Med 1996; 100(5A): 52S-57S

    7. Acid Suppression (2): PPI use Omeprazole PO in pts who did not receive endoscopic therapy: The need for surgery and transfusion: lower No significant change in mortality Khuroo MS, et al. NEJM 1997; 336(15): 1054-8 Omeprazole IV in pts who had receive endoscopic therapy: Recurrent bleeding rates: 6.7% vs. 22.5% No difference in surgical procedures or mortality Lau JY, et al. NEJM 2000; 343(5): 310-6

    8. Acid Suppression Therapy (3) Summary It may play an adjunctive role in short-term management of pts with UGI bleeding It should NOT be the ONLY intervention!!

    9. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (1) Definition of “early” endoscopy A significant controversy In general: within 24 hrs of presentation Emergent endoscopy For pts who are hemodynamically unstable Improve short-term morbidity/mortality

    10. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (2) Parameters of risk assessment Clinical signs: shock, massive hemorrhage Endoscopic findings: an important guide to predict the risk of rebleeding and the appropriate setting for post-endoscopic management Establishment of scoring systems

    11. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (3) Clinical & endoscopic data are both used: identifying pts at low risk for rebleeding and who can be managed in an outpatient setting. Longstreth GF, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47(3): 219-22 4 variables (hemodynamics, time from bleeding, comorbidity, endoscopic finding): reduce hospital LOS in low-risk pts from 4.6 days to 2.9 days Hay JA, et al. JAMA 1997; 278(24): 2151-6

    12. Pre-endoscopy Risk Assessment (4) Summary--benefit of risk assessment: Shorter hospital length of stay Reduction in cost of care Common predictors of rebleeding Older age Hemodynamic instability Comorbid disease (e.g. CAD, CHF, CRI) Anticoagulants use/ coagulopathy Specific endoscopic findings (e.g. malignancy) High-risk lesion in scope (e.g. arterial bleeding)

    13. Endoscopy (1) Hemostatic techniques: Laser: limited use, expensive cost Thermal contact: widely available, obvious reduction in adverse outcomes Injection therapy: epinephrine and sclerosant solutions, easily use Complications: perforation, worsening of bleeding

    14. Endoscopy (2) A net benefit in the management of pts with high-risk lesions Improved medical outcomes with therapeutic endoscopic interventions ?significantly lower healthcare costs Gralnek IM, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46(2): 105-12

    15. Endoscopy (3): special conditions Esophageal or gastric varices: sclerosis or banding AVM, Mallory-Weiss tears: electrocautery with or without epinephrine and/or sclerosants Peptic ulcers: a test for H. pylori ? positive H. pylori eradication reduces long-term rate of rebleeding.

    16. Actively bleeding ulcers (1) Actively bleeding ulcers & ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels: Seen in up to 35% of pts with ulcers at the time of endoscopy Greatest risk of poor outcomes and rebleeding Rollhauser C, et al. Endoscopy 1999; 31(1): 17-25

    17. Actively bleeding ulcers (2) Endoscopic therapies: Injeciton of epinephrine and/or sclerosants, electrocautery, heater probe Reduction in rebleeding rates After endoscopy: Observation in acute care setting Rebleeding can occur in up to 20% of pts, within 48-72 hrs. Saeed ZA, et al. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 288-94

    18. Actively bleeding ulcers (3) If rebleeding occurs: Repeat endoscopy, angiography, surgery Lau JYW, et al. (1999): 48 pts undergoing endoscopic retreatment vs. 44 pts receiving surgery 35 of 48 pts had long-term control of bleeding (73%). 13 of 48 pts the need for surgery and was associated with fewer complications. Lau JYW, et al. NEJM 1999; 340: 751-6

    19. Actively bleeding ulcers (4) Ulcers with overlying clots: Removal of the clot may be beneficial. It can be removed by simple irrigation, to expose the underlying ulcer bases. Laine L, et al. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43(2): 107-10

    22. Thank You for Your Attention 93/01/23

More Related