1 / 12

Promise Neighborhoods US Department of Education

Promise Neighborhoods US Department of Education. Summary and Analysis of 2011 Grantees. Grantee Overview. Distribution by Absolute Priority, Applicant Type, and Competitive Priority Core element in PN theory of change: Both (great schools) and (strong systems of support)

zoe
Download Presentation

Promise Neighborhoods US Department of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Promise NeighborhoodsUS Department of Education Summary and Analysis of 2011 Grantees

  2. Grantee Overview • Distribution by Absolute Priority, Applicant Type, and Competitive Priority • Core element in PN theory of change: Both (great schools) and (strong systems of support) • Case Studies – Need/Capacity/Strategy • Northside Achievement Zone (Minneapolis, MN) • Berea College (Rural Eastern Kentucky/Appalachia) • Community Action Project (Tulsa, OK) • Additional Resources

  3. 5 Implementation 15 Planning AP2: Rural; AP3: Tribal

  4. Absolute Priority Geographic Distribution: Large and Mid-Size Cities, Rural, Tribal AP 3: Tribal AP 2: Rural AP 2: Rural * All figures reflect applications peer reviewed

  5. Applicant Type Nonprofit Organizations, Colleges and Universities, Indian Tribe Indian Tribe IHE IHE Nonprofit

  6. Competitive Priorities* Early Learning, Internet Connectivity, Arts, Affordable Housing % % * Applicants could select up to 2 competitive priorities

  7. Both great schools… • PN theory of change focused on putting great schools at center of revitalization efforts • At least half of 2011 PN grantees integrate school turnaround efforts supported by School Improvement Grants (SIG) • Teachers directly involved in several PN grantees • Charter-district collaboration efforts among PN schools throughout implementation and planning cohort • Other Department of Education reforms also central: • MN Early Learning Challenge Fund efforts led by Minneapolis PN implementation grantee team • Planning grantees in NY and TN explicitly incorporate district-led RTT reforms in their strategies to improve teaching and learning

  8. and strong systems of support • Persistent poverty in PNs demands comprehensive family and community supports: • Chicago’s Roseland PN focusing on Fenger High School, location of tragic fatal beating of honor student Derrion Albert in 2009 • Youth of Campo Mission Indian Tribe believe they are more likely to go to jail than to college • Federal agency integration works to break down “silos” • 2 PN grantees receiving Choice Neighborhoods grants from HUD • Fresno and Detroit planning grantees aligned with White House Strong Cities Strong Communities initiative • All 5 implementation grantees eligible for additional funding from DOJ to support public safety strategies • 100%+ match among implementation grantees, including private match and strong leverage of other public sources • Robust family and community engagement strategies evidenced by community schools approach of many grantees

  9. MN 71% MPS 41% 28% Northside Achievement Zone(Minneapolis) Implementation Grant At/above grade-level reading (all students) • Violence: In the last 2 weeks of August 2011, 3 teenagers (13, 14 and 19 years old) were murdered within or immediately adjacent to the Zone • Low expectations: Less than 1/3 of parents in neighborhood expect their children to complete a college degree NAZ • Teachers and Leaders: NAZ convened a “Principal Learning Community” of 8/9 target schools in neighborhood, including traditional, charter, and private schools • Early learning: Close partnership with statewide Children’s Cabinet leadership, who developed MN’s successful Early Learning Challenge Fund proposal • Cash match: $630,000 from local and national foundations in Y1, individual and corporate investors • Persistence: High-scoring 2010 PN applicant that continued efforts without a Federal planning grant—an example for other communities pursuing PN strategy

  10. US 43% KY 22% 12% Berea College (Eastern Kentucky/Appalachia) Implementation Grant – Rural Priority Percentage College Ready in Math (11th Grade) • Distress: Among 3K rural counties in nation, most economically distressed are in PN—Owsley (3rd), Clay (4th), and Jackson (37th) • Gap: PN students track KY closely until 7th grade, after which achievement gap opens wide in high school PN • Secondary Schools Focus: Berea is highly-rated 2011 i3 applicant—implementing NMSI AP Training and Incentive Program in PN middle and high schools • Data Sharing: Agreement among school superintendents, the KY Department of Education, and KY Council on Postsecondary Education on plan (with requisite permissions) to build cradle-to-career data system with record level data • Public-Private Partnership: Strong partnership with Save the Children, a national foundation providing early learning and literacy programs throughout neighborhood • Management Plan: Berea exemplifies equity and excellence—first Southern college to be coeducational and racially integrated, and provides full scholarship to all (low-income) students; GEAR UP grantee that has increased high school graduation and college-going rates in PN by 10+ points since 1999

  11. OK 11% TPS 18% 38% Community Action Project (Tulsa, OK) Planning Grant Dropout Rate Poverty: 86% of children under 18 and 89% of children under five in poor households. Median household income in the PN was at $13,142 according to census tract data, far below the Tulsa County median of $45,264 Rogers HS • Rigor and Comprehensiveness: Combine college and career-readiness curriculum from ACT and America’s Choice with community schools model • Integrated approach: CAP received 2011 Choice Neighborhoods (HUD) planning grant for one of target neighborhoods + Social Innovation Fund (CNCS) sub grant to implement SaveUSA, an asset development initiative • Management Plan: CAP’s $48.5M annual budget of cradle-to-career public services focused on early learning (Head Start) and financial asset building • Evidence-Based Practice: Partnership with ChildTrend’s LINKS database of 172 random assignment, intent-to-treat evaluations of social interventions for children • More Persistence: Also a high-scoring 2010 PN applicant that did not receive grant

  12. Additional Resources • Promise Neighborhoods website • Press releaseannouncing the Promise Neighborhoods planning grantees • Detailed listof the 2011 Promise Neighborhoods Planning Grantees • FAQsrelated to the Secretary's announcement in reference to the 2011 Planning Grantees  • Information about all Promise Neighborhoods applicants available on data.ed.gov -  http://www.data.ed.gov/grants/oii/2011/promise-neighborhoods • White House Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative and Creating Pathways to OpportunityReport

More Related