1 / 46

NEGF Method: Capabilities and Challenges

Gate. M. SOURCE. DRAIN. CHANNEL. INSULATOR. V G. V D. I. NEGF Method: Capabilities and Challenges. Supriyo Datta School of Electrical & Computer Engineering Purdue University. Molecular Electronics. CNT Electronics. Molecular Sensor. ‘s’. Gate. H + U. M. SOURCE.

zody
Download Presentation

NEGF Method: Capabilities and Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gate M SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I NEGF Method:Capabilities and Challenges Supriyo Datta School of Electrical & Computer Engineering Purdue University Molecular Electronics CNT Electronics Molecular Sensor

  2. ‘s’ Gate H + U M SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Nanodevices: A Unified View Unified Model Molecular Electronics CNT Electronics Molecular Sensor

  3. ‘s’ H + U -t -t -t -t 2t 2t 2t SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Hamiltonian, [H] Effective Mass Equation Finite Difference / Finite Element Damle, Ren, Venugopal, Lundstrom ---> nanoMOS

  4. ‘s’ H + U , are matrices SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Hamiltonian, [H] Nanowire Electronics Atomistic sp3d basis Rahman, Wang, Ghosh, Klimeck, Lundstrom

  5. ‘s’ Gate H + U , are (2x2) matrices Hamiltonian, [H] CNT Electronics Atomistic pz basis Guo, Lundstrom

  6. ‘s’ Gate H + U Hamiltonian, [H] Nanowire/CNT Electronics Atomistic non-orthogonal basis EHT Siddiqui, Kienle, Ghosh, Klimeck

  7. ‘s’ H + U Hamiltonian, [H] Molecular Electronics Atomistic basis: Huckel / EHT / Gaussian Ghosh, Rakshit,Liang, Zahid, Siddiqui, Golizadeh, Bevan, Kazmi

  8. ‘s’ H + U “Self-energy”,

  9. ‘s’ gate H + U “Self-energy”,

  10. ‘s’ gate H + U “Self-energy”,

  11. ‘s’ gate H + U “Self-energy”,

  12. ‘s’ [H] H + U [H] “Self-energy”,

  13. ‘s’ H + U From molecule to QPC “molecule” Damle, Ghosh PRB (2001)

  14. Quantum Chemistry Surface Physics Surface Physics Bridging Disciplines Basis mixing: Ghosh, Liang, Kienle, Polizzi

  15. C60 on Silicon I II III dI/dV IV I IV II dI/dV III T(E) STS measurements: (a) Dekker, et al., surface science 2002. (b)& (c) Yao, et al, surface science 1996 V (V) Theory: Liang, Ghosh

  16. Molecule on silicon Quantum chemistry Surface Physics Expt:Mark Hersam Nanoletters, 01/04 Cover story Room temperature (a) V = 0 (b) V < 0 (c) V > 0

  17. ‘s’ H + U NEGF equations

  18. ‘s’ H + U µ1 µ2 Matrices <--> Numbers

  19. “Poisson” N --> U Self- Consistent Solution U --> N SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Minimal Model U --> I Nanowires / Nanotubes / Molecules

  20. µ1 µ2 INSULATOR CHANNEL W L z x E D(E) FET: Why current “saturates” ? Drain current Drain voltage

  21. ‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U 3D Poisson solver: Eric Polizzi Method of moments: Jing Guo

  22. ‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U 3D Poisson solver: Eric Polizzi Method of moments: Jing Guo Correlations

  23. ‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U Quantum Chemistry: Closed System in Equilibrium U H+U, N

  24. ‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U Quantum Chemistry: Closed System in Equilibrium U H+U, N

  25. ‘s’ H + U Self-consistent field, U Quantum Chemistry: Closed System in Equilibrium U H+U, N

  26. ‘s’ H + U Which self-consistent field ? µ

  27. ‘s’ H + U Which LDA ?

  28. ‘s’ H + U Which LDA ? IP = E(N) - E(N-1) EA = E(N+1) - E(N)

  29. N vs. µ µ N - N0

  30. N vs. µ: SCF Theory µ U0/2 N - N0 Rakshit

  31. Self-interaction Correction µ U0/2 No general method N - N0

  32. 11 10 01 00 One-electron vs. Many-electron N one-electron levels 2^N many electron levels

  33. ‘s’ H + U 11 10 01 00 Two choices 2^N many electron levels Works for Works for

  34. ‘s’ H + U 11 10 01 00 Two choices 2^N many electron levels Works for Works for ? Mott insulator Band theory

  35. ‘s’ H + U What is a contact? Klimeck, Lake et.al. APL (1995)

  36. ‘s’ H + U What is a contact? Klimeck, Lake et.al. APL (1995)

  37. ‘s’ H + U “Hot” contacts Energy has to be removed efficiently from the contacts: otherwise --> “hot” contacts

  38. ‘s’ H + U Source Drain “Hot” contacts Venugopal, Lundstrom

  39. ‘s’ H + U Source Drain “Hot” contacts Venugopal, Lundstrom

  40. ‘s’ H + U Other “contacts”

  41. ‘s’ H + U Other “contacts” Hot phonons ?

  42. ‘s’ H + U Other “contacts” Hot phonons ? Molecular desorption ?

  43. ‘s’ H + U Source Drain Hot “contacts” Hot phonons ? Molecular desorption ?

  44. ‘s’ H + U 11 11 10 10 01 01 00 00 Two choices “Contact” State A “Contact” State B Supplement NEGF with separate rate equation for “contact” Rate equation for full system Works for

  45. ‘s’ H + U M SOURCE DRAIN CHANNEL INSULATOR VG VD I Summary Unified Model Electronics & Sensing www.nanohub.org Transients? Strong correlations ? “Hot contacts” ? Electrical Resistance: An Atomistic View, Nanotechnology 15 , S433 (2004)

  46. EXPT: Karlsruhe THEORY: Purdue Group (cond-mat/0403401) Experiment vs. Theory Zahid, Paulsson, Ghosh

More Related