1 / 23

DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES IN CENTRAL ASIA

DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES IN CENTRAL ASIA. WORKSHOP ON COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP MODELS WITH CENTRAL ASIA 22-23 February 2012, Ankara. COMCEC Coordination Office. BACKGROUND.

zazu
Download Presentation

DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES IN CENTRAL ASIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES IN CENTRAL ASIA • WORKSHOP ON COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP MODELS WITH CENTRAL ASIA • 22-23 February 2012, Ankara COMCEC Coordination Office

  2. BACKGROUND • 37th Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers (2010): Resolution for the Preparation of a Plan of Action for Cooperation of the OIC with Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) • 38th Session of the Council of Foreign Ministers(2011): Adoption of the Plan of Action for Cooperation of the OIC with Central Asia • COMCEC Coordination Office offered to host a workshop to discuss and define possible partnership modalities to enhance the cooperation of the OIC Member States with Central Asia in collaboration with Turkish Cooperation and Coordination Agency (TIKA) 2/22

  3. OBJECTIVES • Sharing best practices in the field of technical cooperation • Identifying basic obstacles/challenges in the existing technical cooperation programs/projects • Discussing the means for more effective cooperation between OIC and Central Asia 3/22

  4. PARTICIPATION • Central Asian Member States (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan) • OIC Member States,which are partners of technical cooperation programs/projects implemented in Central Asian countries • International Organizations 4/22

  5. MAIN INDICATORS GDP (2010, Current Prices, Billion USD) GDP per capita (2010, Current Prices, USD) 5/22 Source: World Bank, OECD, Economist Intelligence Unit

  6. MAIN INDICATORS - KAZAKHSTAN Intra-OIC Trade/Total Trade (%) Intra-OIC Trade (Million USD) 6/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  7. MAIN INDICATORS - KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Intra-OIC Trade (Million USD) Intra-OIC Trade/Total Trade (%) 7/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  8. MAIN INDICATORS – TAJIKISTAN Intra-OIC Trade (Million USD) Intra-OIC Trade/Total Trade (%) 8/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  9. MAIN INDICATORS – TURKMENISTAN Intra-OIC Trade (Million USD) Intra-OIC Trade/Total Trade (%) 9/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  10. MAIN INDICATORS - UZBEKISTAN Intra-OIC Trade (Million USD) Intra-OIC Trade/Total Trade (%) 10/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  11. MAIN INDICATORS – KAZAKHSTAN Health Expenditure/GDP (%) Education Expenditure/GDP (%) 11/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  12. MAIN INDICATORS - KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Health Expenditure/GDP (%) Education Expenditure 12/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  13. MAIN INDICATORS – TAJIKISTAN Health Expenditure/GDP (%) Education Expenditure 13/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  14. MAIN INDICATORS – TURKMENISTAN Health Expenditure/GDP (%) 14/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  15. MAIN INDICATORS – UZBEKISTAN Health Expenditure/GDP (%) 15/22 Source: World Bank, SESRIC

  16. COOPERATION – KAZAKHSTAN Top 5 Partners (Million USD/2005-09 Average) Net ODA Received (Million USD) Distribution of ODA by Sector Education Other Social Sectors Economic Infrastructure and services Health and Population Administrative Cost Multi-Sector Other Multi-Sector Other Social Sectors Humanitarian Aid Unspecified Production Sectors Program Assistance 16/22 Source: World Bank, OECD, Economist Intelligence Unit

  17. COOPERATION - KYRGYZ REPUBLIC Distribution of ODA by Sector Net ODA Received (Million USD) Top 5 Partners (Million USD, Average) Health and Population Other Social Sectors Economic Infrastructure and services Education Unspecified Production Sectors Multi Sector Humanitarian aid Program Assistance 17/22 Source: World Bank, OECD, Economist Intelligence Unit

  18. COOPERATION – TAJIKISTAN Distribution of ODA by Sector Net ODAReceived (Million USD) Top 5 Partners (Million USD, Average) Health and Population Other Social Sectors Education Economic Infrastructure and services Unspecified Multi Sector Production Sectors Humanitarian aid Program Assistance 18/22 Source: World Bank, OECD, Economist Intelligence Unit

  19. COOPERATION – TURKMENISTAN Distribution of ODA by Sector Net ODA Received (Million USD) Top 5 Partners (Million USD,Average) Health and Population Other Social Sectors Education Multi Sector Production Sectors Program Assistance Economic Infrastructure and services Humanitarian Aid Source: World Bank, OECD, Economist Intelligence Unit 19/22

  20. COOPERATION – UZBEKISTAN Distribution of ODA by Sector Net ODA Received (Million USD) Top 5 Partners (Million USD, Average) Other Social Sectors Health and Population Education Economic Infrastructure and services Production Sectors Multi Sector Program Assistance 20/22 Source: World Bank, OECD, Economist Intelligence Unit

  21. RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE • Egypt • Islamic Republic • of İran • Malaysia • Turkey • United Arab • Emirates Leading OIC Partners with Central Asia (in alphabetic order) Top Sectors Types of Technical Cooperation • Education • Infrastructure • Health • Private Sector • Development • Trade Facilitation • Climate Change • Social Sectors • Workshop • Seminar • Training (On-Site) • Internship • Study Visit • Exchange of • Experts • Consultation • Services 21/22 Source: COMCEC Questionnaire for Technical Cooperation in the Central Asia

  22. MAIN CHALLENGES RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE • Lack of Coordination between Parties • Non-Alignment with Institutional Priorities and Strategies • “Availability Window” rather than “Requirement Window” • Insufficient On-Site Analysis • Inadequate Impact Assessment • Lack of Qualified Experts on Relevant Fields • Limited Inclusion of LocalExperts in Project Preparation and • Implementation Phases 22/22 Source: COMCEC Questionnaire for Technical Cooperation in the Central Asia

  23. THANK YOU • 22-23 February 2012, Ankara COMCEC Coordination Office

More Related