Nucleus as an Open System: Continuum Shell Model and New Challenges Vladimir Zelevinsky NSCL/ Michigan State University Supported by NSF Caen, GANIL May 30, 2014. OUTLINE. From closed to open manybody systems
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
as an Open System:
Continuum Shell Model and
New Challenges
Vladimir Zelevinsky
NSCL/ Michigan State University
Supported by NSF
Caen, GANIL May 30, 2014
2011
2009
2003
User group of over 1300 members with approx. 20 working groups
www.fribusers.org
NSCL Science Is Aligned with National Priorities Articulated by National Research Council RISAC Report (2006), NSAC LRP (2007),NRC Decadal Survey of Nuclear Physics (2012), “Tribble Report” (2013)
Properties of nuclei – UNEDF SciDAC, FRIB Theory Center (?)
Astrophysical processes – JINA
Tests of fundamental symmetries
Societal applications and benefits
Reaping benefits from recent investments while creating future opportunities
Medical research
Examples: 47Sc, 62Zn, 64Cu, 67Cu, 68Ge, 149Tb, 153Gd, 168Ho, 177Lu, 188Re, 211At, 212Bi, 213Bi, 223Ra (DOE expert panel)
MSU Radiology Dept. interested in 60,61Cu
emitters 149Tb, 211At: potential treatment of metastatic cancer
Plant biology: role of metals in plant metabolism
Environmental and geosciences: ground water, role of metals as catalysts
Engineering: advanced materials, radiation damage, diffusion studies
Toxicology: toxicology of metals
Biochemistry: role of metals in biological process and correlations to disease
Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences: movement of pollutants through environmental and biological systems
Reaction rates important for stockpile stewardship – nonclassified research
Determination of extremely high neutron fluxes by activation analysis
Rareisotope samples for (n,g), (n,n’), (n,2n), (n,f) e.g. 88,89Zr
Same technique important for astrophysics
Far from stability: surrogate reactions (d,p), (3He,a xn) …
Vision: Up to 10 Faculty Positions for CrossDisciplinary and Applied Research
From closed to open (or marginally stable)
manybody system
CLOSED SYSTEMS:
Bound states
Mean field, quasiparticles
Symmetries
Residual interactions
Pairing, superfluidity
Collective modes
Quantum manybody chaos (GOE type)
Open systems:
Continuum energy spectrum
Unstable states, lifetimes
Decay channels (E,c)
Energy thresholds
Cross sections
Resonances, isolated or overlapping
Statistics of resonances and cross sections
Unified approach? (Many…)
From giant resonances to superradiance
The doorway state is connected directly to external world, other states (next level) only through the doorway.
Examples: IAS, singleparticle resonance, giant resonances
at high excitation energy, intermediate structures.
Feshbach resonance in traps, superradiance
Evolution of complex energies
Total states 8!/(3! 5!)=56; states that decay fast 7!/(2! 5!)=21 – superradiant doorways
Mechanism of superradiance
Interaction via continuum
Trapped states  selforganization
Narrow resonances and broad superradiant state in 12C
in the region of Delta
Bartsch et.al. Eur. Phys. J. A 4, 209 (1999)
N. Auerbach, V.Z.. Phys. Lett. B590, 45 (2004)
[1] C. Mahaux and H. Weidenmüller, Shellmodel approach to nuclear reactions,
NorthHolland Publishing, Amsterdam 1969
State embedded in the continuum
(Eigenchannels in Pspace)
(offshell)
(onshell)
Factorization (unitarity), energy dependence
(kinematic thresholds) , coupling through continuum
17O
Correction to Harmonic Oscillator Wave Function
s,p, and d waves (red, blue, black)
N Michel, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.
36 (2009) 013101
A. Volya, EPJ Web of Conf. 38, 03003 (2012).
Formally exact approach
Limit of the traditional shell model
Unitarity of the scattering matrix
“kappa” parameter
No approximations until now
One open channel
Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 052501 (2005);
Phys. Rev. C 67, 054322 (2003);
Phys. Rev. C 74, 064314 (2006).
[1] C. R. Hoffman et al., Phys. Lett. B 672, 17 (2009); Phys.Rev.Lett.102,152501(2009); Phys.Rev.C83,031303(R)(2011); E. Lunderberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 142503 (2012).
[2] A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 052501 (2005); Phys. Rev. C 67, 054322 (2003); 74, 064314 (2006).
[3] G. Hagen et.al Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 242501 (2012)
[2] A. Volya and V.Z. Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 064314, [3] G. Hagen et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 242501
1+
experiment 2+
Figure: 23O(n,n)23O Effect of selfenergy term (red curve). Shaded areas show experimental values with uncertainties.
Experimental data from:
C. Hoffman, et.al. Phys. Lett. B672, 17 (2009)
Twoneutron sequential decay of 26O
A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Continuum shell model, Phys. Rev. C 74, 064314 (2006).
States marked with longer lines correspond to sdshell model; only l=0,2 partial waves
included in theoretical results.
References
[1] A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky
Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 064314
[2] A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky
Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 052501
[3] A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky
Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 054322
(self – made recipes) …
*W.Press, S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, B. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C++
the art of scientific computing, Cambrige University Press, 2002
T. Ikegami and S. Iwata, J. of Comp. Chem. 23 (2002) 310318
Definitions
n  labels particlehole state
n – excitation energy of state n
dn  dipole operator
An – decay amplitude of n
Model Hamiltonian
Driving GDR externally
(doing scattering)
Everything depends on
angle between multidimensional vectors
A and d
Definitions
n  labels particlehole state
n – excitation energy of state n
dn  dipole operator
An – decay amplitude of n
Model Hamiltonian
Driving GDR externally
(doing scattering)
Everything depends on
angle between multi dimensional vectors
A and d
Orthogonal:
GDR not seen
Parallel:
Most effective excitation
of GDR from continuum
At angle:
excitation of GDR
and pigmy
Parallel case:
Deltaresonance
and particlehole
states with pion
quantum numbers
A model of 20 equally
distant levels is used
Loosely stated, the PTD is based on the assumptions that
swave neutron scattering is a singlechannel process, the
widths are statistical, and timereversal invariance holds;
hence, an observed departure from the PTD implies that
one or more of these assumptions is violated
P.E. Koehler et al.
PRL 105, 072502 (2010)

(b) and (d) are wrong; (c), (e), (f), (g) depend on the nucleus
(chaotic closed system, single open channel)
G. Shchedrin, V.Z., PRC (2012)
in an open system with
a single decay channel:
No level repulsion in
the intermediate region
0.5
0.1
1.0
5.0
No level repulsion at short distances!
(Energy of an unstable state is not well defined)
Hamiltonian Matrix:
N=1000
e=0 and v=1
Critical decay strength g about 2
Decay width as a function of energy
Location of particle
Ziletti et al. Phys. Rev. B 85, 052201 (2012)
Manybranch (M) junction coupled at the origin
Longlived quasibound states at the junction
Average width of all widths or of (allM) widths, M=4
Universal “phase transition”
SIMILAR SYSTEMS: inserted qubit
sequence of twolevel atoms
coupled oscillators
heatbath environment
realistic reservoirs
biological molecules
Transmission picture T(12) for M=4;
Blue dashed lines – very strong continuum coupling;
All equal branches
Nonequal branches
Critical disorder parameter
Cross section (conductance) fluctuations
in a system of randomly interacting
fermions, similarly to the shell model,
as a function of the intrinsic interaction
strength. Transition (lambda =1) –
onset of chaos, exactly as in the theory
of universal conductance fluctuations
in quantum wires
7 particles, 14 orbitals,
3432 manybody states, 20 open channels
Cross section (conductance) fluctuations
as a function of openness.
No dependence on the character of chaos,
onebody (disorder) or
manybody (interactions).
Transition to superadiance: kappa=1
(‘’perfect coupling”)
Many – Body
OneBody
1.C. Mahaux and H.A. Weidenmueller, Shell Model Approach to Nuclear Reactions (1969)
Formalism of effective Hamiltonian
2. R.H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954)
Superradiance in quantum optics
3. V.V. Sokolov and V.G. Zelevinsky, Nucl. Phys. A504, 562 (1989); Ann. Phys. 216, 323 (1992).
Superradiance in open manybody systems
4. A. Volya and V. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 052501(2005); Phys. Rev. C 74, 064314 (2006).
Continuum shell model (CSM)
5. N. Michel, W. Nazarewicz, M. Ploszajczak, and T. Vertse, J. Phys. G 36, 013101 (2009).
Alternative approach: Gamow shell model
6. G.L. Celardo et al. Phys. Rev. E 76, 031119 (2007); Phys. Lett. B 659, 170 (2008);
EPL 88, 27003 (2009); A. Ziletti et al. Phys. Rev. B 851, 052201 (2012).; Y. Greenberg et al. EPJ
B86, 368 (2013).
Quantum signal transmission
7. C.W.J. Beenakker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 731 (1997). Universal conductance fluctuations
8. T. Ericson and T. MayerKuckuk, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 16, 183 (1966). ”Ericson fluctuations”
9. N. Auerbach and V.Z. Phys. Rev. C 65, 034601 (2002). Pions and Deltaresonance
11. N. Auerbach and V.Z. Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 106301 (2011). Review  Effective Hamiltonian
12. A. Volya. EPJ Web of Conf. 38, 03003 (2012). From structure to sequential decays.
13. A. Volyaand V.Z. Phys. At. Nucl. 77, 1 (2014). Nuclear physics at the edge of stability.
10. A. Volya, Phys. Rev. C 79, 044308 (2009). Modern development of CSM
* [Kubo]  exponential decay corresponds to the condition for
a physical process to be approximated as a Markovian process
* [Silverman]  indeed a random process, no “cosmic force”
* [Merzbacher]  result of “delicate” approximations
Three stages: shorttime
main (exponential)Oscillations?
longtime
Initial state “memory” time
Internal motion in quasibound state
Example 14C decay: E0=0.157 MeV t2=1021 s
Winter, Phys. Rev., 123,1503 1961.
24O
Time evolution of several SM states in 24O. The absolute value of the survival overlap is shown
A. Volya, Timedependent approach to the continuum shell model, Phys. Rev. C 79, 044308 (2009).
Variance of cross section fluctuations
for a system of randomly interacting
fermions similarly to the nuclear shell
model as a function of the strength
of internal chaotic interaction:
In the transition to chaos (lambda=1),
we see precisely the same evolution
from 2/15 to 1/8 as predicted by theory of universal conductance fluctuations in quantum wires.
Identical results for manybody
chaos (coming from interactions)
and onebody disorder
as a function of degree of
openness (coupling to continuum);
Kappa=1 is “perfect coupling”
(phase transition to superradiance)
Many – Body
OneBody
as an Open System:
Continuum Shell Model and
New Challenges
Vladimir Zelevinsky
NSCL/ Michigan State University
Supported by NSF
BruyèresleChâtel, May 2014