1 / 31

Educator effectiveness:

An Orientation for Teachers. Educator effectiveness:. The purpose of the Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System is to help educators grow as professionals in order to increase student learning. The Educator Effectiveness System in Wisconsin.

zanta
Download Presentation

Educator effectiveness:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Orientation for Teachers Educator effectiveness:

  2. The purpose of the Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System is to help educators grow as professionals in order to increase student learning.

  3. The Educator Effectiveness System in Wisconsin • DPI has established minimum expectations for educator evaluation. • Districts have the authority to add to the system requirements but cannot do less (i.e. district could require 2 SLOs each year) • There are aspects of the EE System that are left to local discretion (Which educators fit the definition of teacher?)

  4. Continuous Improvement Using Multiple Measures Outcomes Practice

  5. The Effectiveness Cycle

  6. First year, and every third year after

  7. Multiple measures

  8. Balancing Multiple Measures One Summary based on evidence of Student Outcomes One Summary based on evidence of Educator Practice

  9. Teacher Observations Minimal Requirements: The Announced Observation and 2 Minis must occur in the Summary Year One additional Mini during the supporting years

  10. Collecting Evidence of Practice Observations Artifacts Typically Domains 1 & 4 Some are mandated (forms that must be completed in Teachscape such as the EEP, Self-Review, Pre and Post Observation Forms (etc.) Others can be uploaded by educator or evaluator • Typically Domains 2 & 3 • Evidence acquired during announced and mini-observations • Evaluator documents and uploads evidence of practice from the announced and unannounced observations

  11. What is an Artifact? • A source of evidence, especially to document effectiveness of components in Domains 1 and 4 • Some artifacts will provide evidence for multiple components- high leverage artifacts • Evaluators will use the rubric to identify the performance level that best matches the evidence of practice within the artifact that has been uploaded

  12. A Few Considerations… • Is there value in aligning some of your artifacts (Unit plan and/or lesson plan that lead to the lesson you teach when you are observed) and a self-reflection of the lesson afterward). • When does an artifact become evidence? If I upload a certificate from a workshop…what does it prove? Consider the value of a short reflection to give meaning to an artifact.

  13. Outcomes .

  14. Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) • 1 SLO • Educator self-approves and scores in all years. • The SLO is part of the Educator Effectiveness Plan

  15. Creating the SLO Score • Educators self-scores his/her SLO annually using the Revised SLO Scoring Rubric. • The rubric contains 2 criteria: one related to results (Did students meet the goals you set?) and one related to process (Did you engage fully in the SLO process?).

  16. Using the Revised SLO Scoring Rubric, the evaluator will assign a holistic score (based on a 1-4 scale) after considering all SLOs. • Score is based on the preponderance of evidence from documentation.

  17. In the typical 3 year Effectiveness Cycle, the educator will have three SLO processes that inform the final holistic score:

  18. Educators in the Summary Year (our first official year of implementation) will only have one SLO process that informs the final holistic score at the end of the 14-15 year:

  19. Turn and Talk • What have you heard that’s new? • What questions do you still have?

  20. Summarizing the Effectiveness Cycle

  21. Final Effectiveness Summary • At the conclusion of the Summary Year, the evaluator determines a score for each Danielson component and also determines one holistic SLO score.

  22. Reporting Scores The component scores (practice) and the holistic SLO score (outcome) are uploaded by Teachscape to DPI’s WISEdash secure, where ONLY the educator and his or her administrators will be able to view the results.

  23. Final Effectiveness Summary • The scores for the components are combined to result in a final Educator Practices Summary. • The holistic SLO score and the Reading/Graduation Rate score are combined to result in a final Student Outcomes Summary. • These scores will be visible to the educator and his/her evaluator in WISEdash secure.

  24. Practice Summary Teachers: • Component scores averaged = Domain Summary • Domain Summaries averaged = Practice Summary

  25. Student Outcomes Summary • Individual measure scores weighted proportionally • Weighted scores added together • Summary rounded to nearest decimal on scale of 1-4 • Example:

  26. Effectiveness Summary Graph

  27. What is Next? • Attend/View additional Teachscape training opportunities • Complete “Beginning of the Year” activities

More Related