1 / 12

The Changing Face of Direct Readout

The Changing Face of Direct Readout. “Oh Brave New World that has such people in it!” - Shakespeare (“The Tempest ”). International EOS/NPP Direct Readout Meeting 3-6 October 2005. Richard Isaacman Vice President, SeaSpace Corp. From the GOES-R Mission Statement:.

Download Presentation

The Changing Face of Direct Readout

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Changing Face of Direct Readout “Oh Brave New World that has such people in it!” - Shakespeare (“The Tempest”) International EOS/NPP Direct Readout Meeting 3-6 October 2005 Richard Isaacman Vice President, SeaSpace Corp.

  2. From the GOES-R Mission Statement: The goals of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) program are to procure spacecraft, instruments, launch services, and a ground segment necessary to maintain an uninterrupted flow of environmental satellite data to users. (Slide taken from NPOESS Field Terminal Users Forum / May 19-20, 2004)Thanks to Darrell R. Robertson NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD Direct Services Division

  3. Who Are the Historical DRO Users? • GOES GVAR Users • Very numerous (thousands) • Very low cost ground stations • Primary interest: weather data; operational • HRPT Users • Smaller in number but still very numerous (1-2 thousand?) • More expensive and elaborate ground stations (LEO) • Primary interest: both research and weather applications • X-Band Users (Mostly Aqua/Terra) • Small number (< 150) but influential • Complex and relatively expensive ground stations • Primary interest: research but seeing increasing operational use

  4. So What’s Happening Here? • Every mission is seeing both operational and research use, regardless of its original design concept. • …and NPP will embody this dual function by design • This dual role creates user communities that were not originally envisioned. This creates: • … demand for unanticipated data products • … new requirements for data archives and dissemination • … a de facto multi-mission role for every ground station NPP/NPOESS is the first DRO mission to acknowledge both of these issues in its mission concept.

  5. In Other Words… Operational to Research Multi-Mission Mixed Research and Operational Research to Operational EOS GOES, POES NPP/NPOESS GOES-R

  6. Good News/Bad News for Gov’t and Suppliers • Good News • More data goodness • Improved access to historical data • E.g., DAACs, Data Pools, NOAA CLASS • Access to higher-level products • …all of which act to increase the user base • Bad News • Need lots more computing power and storage • Larger and more complex data capture infrastructure • …in other words, cost (tends to decrease the user base)

  7. A Digression About Cost The small-to-medium size end-user market has historically been very price sensitive. Take LEO Direct Readout as an example: The number of users proliferates significantly as cost drops (N ~ 1/cost2 or faster) and technology matures. Anecdotally, there is a “takeoff point” below ~$100K where the user base gets very broad.

  8. The Result for Government and Industry:Shared Interest in an Expanded User Base

  9. Users Government Industry A 3-Way Partnership is Critical to Success THIS WON’T WORK Government Industry Users BUT THIS WILL

  10. Some Practical Steps Towards Creating a “User-Centric” DRO Ground Segment • Release processing software in a modular (rather than layered) fashion to allow system integrators to offer users a menu of options. • “It is important that agencies make pre-processing packages available to the greatest extent possible, whether they are developed in-house or in the research or commercial communities.”(CEOS Ad Hoc Team on Data Utilization, 11/2003) • Early release of libraries will aid transition and improve vendor support to customers • Use self-documenting file formats with OS-independent libraries. • HDF, netCDF, whatever • HRIT becoming a de facto standard; consider hopping on that bandwagon

  11. More Practical Steps • Processing software should be integrable into existing COTS structures. • Consider backwards compatibility • Real-time users who want L2+ products will still run vendor or own software packages • KISS! • Ground station architects (software and hardware) must coordinate more closely with network technologists • E.g., National Lambda Rail (NLR) in U.S. • Improve usability of existing large archives • Biggest areas of improvement: user interfaces, response time

  12. Some Final Inspirational Thoughts • The DRO user community is now highly multi-mission and interdisciplinary, and every new mission accelerates this trend. • Data acquisition and product processing requirements should not be cost-prohibitive for the user/customer. • Facilitating greater availability of data products will increase the size of the user base, thus fulfilling the IPO’s mission and benefiting both end users and suppliers. ← “The Inspiration of St. Matthew” (Caravaggio, 1602)

More Related