1 / 22

A Cross-State Comparison of Arkansas's Highway Financing and Infrastructure Quality

A Cross-State Comparison of Arkansas's Highway Financing and Infrastructure Quality. Arkansas Highway Facts. [1] Source: Federal Highway Administration (2007) [2] Source: Bureau of Legislative Research (2008). Arkansas and the Surrounding States. Source: Snyder, J. (2008)

yoko
Download Presentation

A Cross-State Comparison of Arkansas's Highway Financing and Infrastructure Quality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Cross-State Comparison of Arkansas's Highway Financing andInfrastructure Quality

  2. Arkansas Highway Facts [1] Source: Federal Highway Administration (2007) [2] Source: Bureau of Legislative Research (2008)

  3. Arkansas and the Surrounding States Source: Snyder, J. (2008) *Source: Federal Highway Administration (2007)

  4. A Comparison of Arkansas’s Highway Funding with the Surrounding States • All the values presented exclude federal funding, thus only state-level highway department revenues are included. • Historical data covers the last 25 years. (1982-2006) • All values presented are in real terms.

  5. Highway Construction Cost Index vs. Inflation

  6. Total Highway Revenues from 1982-2006 Source: Federal Highway Administration

  7. Total Highway Revenues from 1982-2006 Source: Federal Highway Administration

  8. Average Change in Total Highway Funding from 1982-2006

  9. Per Capita Highway Revenues from 1982-2006 Source: Federal Highway Administration

  10. Per Capita Highway Revenues from 1982-2006 Source: Federal Highway Administration

  11. Average Per Capita Highway Funding from 1982-2006

  12. State Highway Department Revenues per Mile from 1982-2006 Source: Federal Highway Administration

  13. Arkansas Highway Department Revenues per Mile from 1982-2006 Source: Federal Highway Administration

  14. 25 Year Average Highway Funding per Mile • Louisiana ranks first in funding per mile • Arkansas ranks last among the states in this sample.

  15. A Comparison of Arkansas’s Current Road Quality with the Surrounding States • Road Quality measured objectively using the International Roughness Index (IRI). • The IRI is an objective equipment-based measure that allows for cross-state comparisons of road quality. • Based on the IRI, a score value was calculated and the 7 states within the sample were ranked according to road quality.

  16. Rural Area - InternationalRoughness Index Score

  17. Urban Area - InternationalRoughness Index Score

  18. Overall - InternationalRoughness Index Score

  19. Arkansas Road Quality Categories Compared To The National Average [1] Source: American Society of Civil Engineers (2006)

  20. Overall Trends • Tennessee spends less per capita and per highway mile, but ranks highest in road quality. • Louisiana leads the region in highway funding per mile and ranks second in funding per capita, but has the poorest quality roads.

  21. Overall Trends The bottom line: Based on our analysis, there is not a significant correlation between the IRI road quality index and funding. This suggests that other factors may affect road quality other than the amount of funding received.

  22. Conclusion • Arkansas’s average highway funding since 1982 has increased 3.10%. (in real terms) • Among the 7 surrounding states, Arkansas ranks: • 4th in per capita funding • 7th in funding per highway mile • 3rd overall road quality (measured by the IRI) • Arkansas’s road quality is also above the national average.

More Related