Graduate careers australia survey managers information forum 2014
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 9

Graduate Careers Australia Survey Managers Information Forum 2014 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 86 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Usage of AGS data and the future. Graduate Careers Australia Survey Managers Information Forum 2014. Chandrama Acharya Strategic Planning and Information Division Macquarie University July 2014. AGS Code of Practice and Usage of Data. The data should be

Download Presentation

Graduate Careers Australia Survey Managers Information Forum 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Graduate careers australia survey managers information forum 2014

Usage of AGS data and the future

Graduate Careers Australia Survey Managers Information Forum 2014

Chandrama Acharya

Strategic Planning and Information Division

Macquarie University

July 2014


Ags code of practice and usage of data

AGS Code of Practice and Usage of Data

The data should be

  • used with impartiality, objectivity and integrity.

  • analysed using methodologically sound and transparent methods.

  • used and presented in ways that assure the privacy of respondents and confidentiality of their responses.

    Source: Code of Practice Universities of Australia v8, GCA


Graduate careers australia survey managers information forum 2014

Response rate and use of data

Raw GDS, CEQ or PREQ data with, or results based on, institutional response rate below 50.0% should not be disclosed or published external to institution.

Exceptions(with note on response rate):

Federal and State Govt departments and any statutory bodies

Professional bodies

External auditing bodies

Academic researchers

GCA


Usage of ags data

Usage of AGS data

  • Federal Government

    • MyUniversity website (public)

    • Institutional Performance Portfolio (IPP)

    • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA)

  • Others

    • Good University Guide

    • QS Stars Rating

    • Universities Australia

    • University groups

    • Researchers

    • Professional bodies (accreditation purposes)


Graduate careers australia survey managers information forum 2014

Institutional Use of AGS data

Institutional quality assurance and improvement plan to the Commonwealth (Compact)

Understanding student experience

Teaching Performance Indicator

Curriculum enhancement (course performance report, faculty or academic discipline report etc.)

Information on Employability

Career advice

Further study activities (UG/PG conversion, program development )

Marketing


Proposed changes in government surveys

Proposed changes in government surveys

CEQ and GDS will be continued till 2014-15

CEQ will cease

PREQ ?

Graduate Outcome Survey (GOS) - from 2015-16

Employer Satisfaction Survey (ESS) – fourth quarter of 2014

pilot result is out. Main recommendations:

further research on developing methodology, items and clusters

future ESS be conducted in conjunction with AGS or BGS

full census of AGS respondents

Source : http://education.gov.au/upholding-quality-quality-indicators-learning-and-teaching


Graduate careers australia survey managers information forum 2014

What is ahead..

Changes in Methodology

Centralised administration

Reliable

Cost effective to institution

Sample survey, rather than population

Effective response rate


Implications for institutional reporting

Implications for Institutional Reporting

Break in the trend due to change in methodology

Number of responses by narrow FOE

Sub-group analysis by different dimension may not be meaningful, eg

Equity group

Course level analysis

Citizenship

Methodology for benchmarking (eg, weighted or ‘adjusted’ score rather simple score )

Implication for employment outcome data

Timely return of raw data sets to institutions


Contact

Contact

Chandrama Acharya

Manager, Surveys

[email protected]


  • Login