When call is the better choice
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

”When CALL is the better choice” PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 78 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

”When CALL is the better choice”. Jane Vinther, Ph.D. University of Southern Denmark [email protected] CALL 2008 conference 29.08-02.09.2008 University of Antwerp. Level C1 European Framework. Students …

Download Presentation

”When CALL is the better choice”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


When call is the better choice

”When CALL is the better choice”

Jane Vinther, Ph.D.

University of Southern Denmark

[email protected]

CALL 2008 conference 29.08-02.09.2008

University of Antwerp


Level c1 european framework

Level C1 European Framework

Students …

  • Can understand with ease virtually everything heard or read. Can summarise information from different spoken and written sources, reconstructing arguments and accounts in a coherent presentation. Can express him/herself spontaneously, very fluently and precisely, differentiating finer shades of meaning even in more complex situations. (Common European Framework, p.24. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf.)


When call is the better choice

“In its original sense, communicative competence certainly includes grammatical competence, but unfortunately the term communicative competence is now widely understood in language pedagogy to mean the ability to communicate; to get meaning across” (Garrett,1995:350).


The role of and need for metalinguistic knowledge

The role of (and need for ?) metalinguistic knowledge

  • Færch (1985: 190):

    ”an important heuristic tool” .

  • Basturkmen, Loewen & Ellis (2002:11):

    ”The more explicitly a linguistic item is addressed, the more likely students are to notice and incorporate it in their production”.


The role of and need for metalinguistic knowledge1

The role of (and need for ?) metalinguistic knowledge

  • Sharwood Smith (2004:276):

    ”metalinguistic knowledge is as open to automatisation as any other domain of knowledge”


The tool

THE TOOL


Tree diagram building interface

Tree diagram building interface


Tree diagram building interface1

Tree diagram building interface


The study

THE STUDY

  • Primary study :

    large comparative study of CALL effective ness

  • Secondary study:

    small subsequent study focused on achievement groups


The study primary and secondary

THE STUDY(primary and secondary)

  • Subjects:

    Danish advanced learners of English

  • Treatment:

    10 weeks of metalinguistic input – 57 sentences processed

    Instructional language: English

  • Assessment:

    a. pre-test and post-test

    b. explicit and implicit test sections


Cohort 1 primary study

COHORT 1 (Primary Study)


Results secondary study pre test versus post test

Results (Secondary study): pre-test versus post-test


Call framework

CALL framework

  • Chenu, Gayraud, Martinie & Wu (2007):

    Acquisition of French relative clauses

    * similar achievements for CALL and

    NON-CALL

    * the less proficient students

    benefited most from CALL


Call framework1

CALL framework

  • CONCLUSION:

    CALL appears to be more supportive of less proficient students than the traditional approach

    WHY?

  • Chenu:

    1) learners work in their own pace

    2) single modality medium (written)


Call framework2

CALL framework

  • The present study:

    1) learners work in their own pace

    2) single modality medium (written)

    3) immediate and individual feedback

    4) supportive features of the interface

    5) the interface supports structural

    approach

    6) task completion


Call framework3

CALL framework

  • CALL efficacy and achievement groups

    QUESTIONS:

  • Is it related to metalinguistic knowledge?

  • Is it related to student type?

  • Is it related to more focused attention?


References

References

  • Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S. & Ellis, R. (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom. Language Awareness, 11, 1-13.

  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer Applications in Second language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  • Chenu, F., Gayraud, F., Martinie, B. & Wu, T. (2007). Is computer assisted language learning (CALL) efficient for grammar learning? An experimental study in French as a second language [Electronic Version]. The JALT CALL Journal, 3(3).

  • Færch, C. (1985). Meta talk in the FL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 184-199.

  • Garrett, N. (1995). ICALL and second language acquisition. In M. V. Holland, J. D. Kaplan, & M. R. Sams (Eds.), Intelligent Language Tutors. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Sharwood Smith, M. (2004). In two minds about grammar: On the interaction of linguistic and metalinguistic knowledge in performance. Transaction of the Philosophical Society, 102, 225-280.


  • Login