1 / 45

Gamma ray sources observation with ARGO-YBJ

Gamma ray sources observation with ARGO-YBJ. Silvia Vernetto IFSI-INAF and INFN, Torino, ITALY On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration. IV Workshop on Air Shower detection at high altitude Napoli – February 1, 2013. Tibet AS γ. ARGO. The Yangbajing Cosmic Ray Laboratory Tibet - China.

wlois
Download Presentation

Gamma ray sources observation with ARGO-YBJ

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gamma raysourcesobservationwith ARGO-YBJ Silvia Vernetto IFSI-INAF and INFN, Torino, ITALY On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration IV Workshop on Air Shower detection at high altitude Napoli – February 1, 2013

  2. Tibet ASγ ARGO The Yangbajing Cosmic Ray Laboratory Tibet - China 4300 m a.s.l. Longitude 90° 31’ 50” East Latitude 30° 06’ 38” North

  3. Resistive Plate Chambers carpet

  4. The ARGO-YBJ detector The PAD(56  62 cm2) is the space-time “pixel” Time resolution  1 ns ARGOhas18480PADs Single layer of RPCs detectors • Central carpet 78 x 75 m2 (95 % of active surface) • Sampling ring • 111 x 99 m2 • (20 % of active surface) Trigger requirement: at least 20 particles on the carpet

  5. Recorded Data • Trigger: 20 particles • Rate ~3.5 kHz - Dead time 4% • First data in July 2006 • Stable data taking since November 2007 • Stop operation in February 2013 > 5 years of data • Final results within 2 years

  6. Showers data • Shower core reconstruction Maximum Likelihood Method applied to the lateral density profile of the shower • Fit of the shower front Primary direction Space and time coordinates of the fired PADs

  7. The Moon shadow An important tool to check the detector performances Deficit: > 70 standard deviations  9 standard deviations /month Physics:antiproton / proton ratio in cosmic rays ARGO coll., Phys.Rev. D 84 (2011) 022003 ARGO coll., Phys.Rev. D 85 (2012) 022002

  8. The Moon shadow Energy calibration West displacement of the shadow caused by the Geomagnetic field Bending  1.57° Z / E (TeV) Angular resolution Error in energy scale 13%

  9. Gamma Ray Astronomy with ARGO • Energy threshold: few hundreds of GeV Overlaps with Cherenkov detectors • Integrated sensitivity in 5 y at 1 TeV: 0.26 Crab No gamma-hadron discrimination C.R. background evaluation with an error < 10-3 • Large field of view: ~2 sr • Large duty cycle: 86% First sky survey at ~1 TeV at decl. from -10° to 70°

  10. Gamma Ray sources Galactic sources Extragalactic sources • Crab Nebula • MGRO J1908+06 • Cygnus Region • HESS J1841-055 • Mrk 421 • Mrk 501 new

  11. Galactic sources

  12. Crab Nebula 18 s PSF in agreement with MC Nhit >100 HST (0.5 – 10) TeV

  13. MILAGRO GalacticPlanesurveyat 20 TeV MGRO J2031+41 MGRO J1908+06 MGRO J2019+37 Cygnus region Abdo et al., 2007 3 extended sources associated with FERMI pulsars

  14. MGRO J1908+06 ARGO HESS (2009) 6.2 s HESS extension0.34°±0.04° Inside the nebula FERMI detected a pulsar with period 106.6 ms ARGO extension 0.49°±0.22°

  15. MGRO J1908+06 spectrum F (> 1 TeV) = 69% Crab Flux in agreement with Milagro but higher than HESS by a factor 2-3 Contribution from the Galactic diffuse gamma ray flux < 15% dN/dE = (6.1 ± 1.6) 10-13 (E/4 TeV) –2.54 ± 0.36 ph sec-1 cm-2 TeV-1 ARGO coll., ApJ 760, 110, 2012

  16. MILAGRO GalacticPlanesurveyat 20 TeV MGRO J2031+41 MGRO J1908+06 MGRO J2019+37 Cygnusregion Abdo et al., 2007 3 extended sources associated with FERMI pulsars

  17. The Cygnusregion • One of the more activeregion in the Galaxy • High star formation rate • OB associations • Supernova Remnants • Wolf-Rayetstars • Ionized Gas • High diffuse Gamma Rayflux MGRO J2019+37 MGRO J2031+41 MILAGRO VERITAS Abdo et al., 2012

  18. Cygnusregion by ARGO MGRO J2031+41 MGRO J2019+37 Abdo et al., 2012

  19. Cygnusregion by ARGO MGRO J2031+41 MGRO J2019+37 MILAGRO Abdo et al., 2012

  20. Cygnusregion : MGRO J2031+41 spectrum F (> 1 TeV) = 31% Crab Flux in agreement with Milagro but higher than MAGIC and HEGRA by a factor  10 Contribution from the Galactic diffuse gamma ray flux < 10% dN/dE = (1.40 ± 0.34) 10-11 (E/1 TeV) –2.83 ± 0.37 ph sec-1 cm-2 TeV-1 ARGO coll., ApJL 245, L22, 2012

  21. Cygnusregion : MGRO J2019+37 upperlimits No significant signal observed by ARGO Very hard spectrum ! ARGO coll., ApJL 245, L22, 2012

  22. HESS J1841-055 region with ARGO new Unidentified HESS source HESS extension: 0.4° 0.25° No obvious counterpart Maybe it is composed by different sources Hadronic scenario ? 5.3 s High zenith angle: culmination at 35.7° ARGO coll., submitted to ApJ

  23. HESS J1841-055 Flux higher than HESS by a factor of  3 Contribution from the diffuse Galactic gamma ray flux < 4% dN/dE = (9.6 ± 1.6) 10-13 (E/5 TeV) –2.32 ± 0.23 ph sec-1 cm-2 TeV-1

  24. Source spectra • CRAB point source flux agrees with ACTs • MGRO J1908+06 extended flux ~2-3 ACTs • MGRO J2031+41 extended flux ~5 -10 ACTs • HESS J1841-055 extended flux ~3 ACTs Systematic disagreement for extended sources ! ARGO (and MILAGRO) measure higher fluxes

  25. TeV Crab flares ?

  26. Crab Nebula flaresat E > 100 MeV Fermi data from Buehler slides – Fermi Symposium 2011

  27. Search for flares of duration 1-20 days in 3 years Significances distribution of the excesses in all the time intervals from Nov. 2007 to Feb. 2011 after steady flux subtraction for events with Nhit > 40, 100, 500, 1000 Gauss fit <s> = 0.0210.004 s.d. r.m.s. = 0.9830.003 c2 = 27 (16 deg. of freedom) No significantflarefound in 7×104 trials

  28. September 2010 flare ARGO during the 3 Fermi spikes 3.1 s signal for events with > 40 hits ( E  1 TeV) expected 0.55 s from steady flux FERMI 3 spikes Cherenkov data Balbo et al. A&A 527 L4, 2010

  29. April 2011 flare AGILE light curve E > 100 MeV ARGO during 6 days  4 s signal for events with > 500 hits (E  10 TeV) Expected: 0.47 sfrom steady flux Post trial chance probability  2 × 10-2 6 days No Cherenkovmeasurements

  30. July 3 2012 flare On July 3 Fermi observed an increase of the Crab Nebula flux by a factor of 2 ARGO on July 3  3.5 s at the Crab position for events with > 100 hits Expected 0.33 sfrom steady flux Post trial chance probability < 10-2 No Cherenkovmeasurements

  31. Extragalactic sources

  32. Mrk 421 - X ray light curve ARGO-YBJ RXTE 2 – 12 keV Mrk421 X-ray light curve Full ARGO start data taking November 2007

  33. Mrk 421 - the first source observed by ARGO δ(deg) ≈ 6 s.d. r.a. (deg) July 2006 flare ARGO Test Data 2006 July 6 – September 2 (110 hours) Flux  3-4 Crab No Cerenkov measurements

  34. Mrk 421 - June 2008 flare OPTICAL Multiwavelenght observations : • GASP-WEBT (R-band) • Rossi RXTE/ASM (2-12 keV) • Swift/BAT (15-50 keV) • SWIFT (UVOT & XRT; June 12-13) • AGILE (E > 100 MeV; June 9-15) • MAGIC and VERITAS (E> 400 GeV; May 27 - June 8) SOFT X-RAYS HARD X-RAYS GAMMA RAYS 2 flaring episodes: June 3-8 and June 9-15 X rays hardness ratio No Cherenkov data after June 8 Donnarumma et al. (2009)

  35. Mrk 421 - June 2008 flare Flux (E > 1 TeV) ~ 6 Crab 3 days average 1 day average Power law spectrum + EBL absorption : dN/dE = (3.2  1.0) · 10-11 (E/2.5) –2.1 0.7 e-t(E) ev cm –2 s –1 TeV –1 ARGO coll., ApJL 714, L208, 2010

  36. Mrk 421 - February 2010 flare 16-18 Feb. 16 Feb. • ARGO observed a strong flare on 16-18 Feb. at 6 s.d. • Flux > 3 Crab Peak flux (16 Feb) > 10 Crab • For the first time an EAS array observed a TeV flare at 4-5 s.d. in one day • VERITAS reported similar observation in Atel #2443.  6 s.d. 17 Feb. 18 Feb.

  37. Mrk 421 - 2010 flares multiwavelenght observations RXTE – SWIFT – FERMI - ARGO February 14 - 23 5 days average RXTE – SWIFT – FERMI - ARGO 5 days average April 25 - May 2 February 16 April 28

  38. Mrk 421 - 3 years correlation with X rays Cumulative counting rate Active periods TeV grays ARGO X- rays 2-12 KeV RXTE/AMS X –rays 15-30 KeV SWIFT/BAT ARGO coll., ApJ 734,110, 2011

  39. Mrk 421 – 3 years correlation between X rays and TeV gamma rays Correlation coefficient vs. time lag RXTE & ARGO Daily counting rates Time lag consistent with zero

  40. Mrk 421 – 3 years correlation Spectral features Spectral index vs. flux TeV flux vs. X-ray flux by Whipple The X ray and TeVspectrahardenincreasing the flux The relation betweenTeV and X-rayfluxesisquadratic

  41. Mrk 421 Spectral modeling One-zone SSC model (Mastichiadis & Kirk,1997, Yang et al., 2008)

  42. Mrk 501 - October 2011 flare Swift BAT (15-50 KeV) After 14 years a new strong X-ray flare FERMI (>300 MeV) ARGO-YBJ (TeV) TeV emission detected by ARGO-YBJ No Cerenkov measurements

  43. Mrk 501 Quasi-steady emission 3.2 years August 2008 - October 2011 Flare : 17 Oct – 22 Nov 2001 6 s.d. Average flux: 0.3 Crab Flare flux : 2.1 Crab

  44. Mrk 501 SED flare SSC model ARGO data during flare are not consistent with a one-zone SSC model The long term emission is consistent with a one-zone SSC model ARGO coll., ApJ 758, 2, 2012

  45. Summary In 4.5 years of observation : • Crab Nebula : spectrum in agreement with other experiments • Some excess in coincidence with flares • MGRO J1908+06 : measured extension and spectrum • observed flux larger than HESS flux • MGRO J2031 +41- observed flux larger than MAGIC & HEGRA flux • MGRO J2019 +37 - not observed • HESS J1841-055 – observed flux larger than HESS flux • Mrk421 : - continuouslymonitored - VHE flux correlated with X-rays - observed flares in 2006, 2008, 2010 - flare on Febuary 2010 detected in only one day • Mrk501 : - new strong flare in 2011

More Related