1 / 21

Eligibility Business Process Re-engineering & Conversion to a Task-Based Model

Eligibility Business Process Re-engineering & Conversion to a Task-Based Model. (Lessons Learned - Successes Achieved) Presented by: Kim Forrester Health & Human Services Agency County of San Diego. Background.

wilton
Download Presentation

Eligibility Business Process Re-engineering & Conversion to a Task-Based Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Eligibility Business Process Re-engineering & Conversion to a Task-Based Model (Lessons Learned - Successes Achieved) Presented by: Kim Forrester Health & Human Services Agency County of San Diego

  2. Background • The County’s eligibility determination performance and productivity trends indicated: • Areas of excellence: Food Stamp Accuracy • Areas for system-wide improvement: • Timely processing of applications within State mandated timeframes - inconsistent • Low Medi-Cal productivity ratio • Low Food Stamps participation • Public assistance eligibility determination processes and operations needed to be refreshed and aligned with CalWIN system

  3. Vision for the Future • A regionalized eligibility determination system that: • Delivers benefits efficiently and accurately to eligible clients • Strengthens the region’s healthcare safety net • Promotes good nutrition and self-sufficiency among low-income San Diego County residents

  4. BPR Project Goals • Establish joint governance • Document and implement consistent core processes • Improve eligibility and clerical training • Improve performance, productivity, and flexibility

  5. BPR Participation and Partners • More than 200 staff • Front-line eligibility & clerical staff and supervisors • Managers • Union representatives participated • UCSD Center for Management Science and Health evaluated progress and measure the impact of changes brought about by the BPR • Community partners and advocates were engaged and regularly updated during the BPR process

  6. How the new task based process works…

  7. Implement a task based eligibility determination process… • In a task based FRC, all HSS: • Work in Task Groups • Perform specific tasks • No assigned caseloads • Emphasize team approach • Process same-day applications

  8. Task Groups Organizational Model Same Day Applications Status Reports Renewals General Tasks Changes Pending

  9. Prior to transitioning to task based and same day intakes… • Family Resource Centers (FRC) must: • Complete case imaging • Train 100% of their eligibility staff in multi-program • Establish a Call Center to support operations

  10. Implementation • Phased-in implementation of task based to all FRCs to evaluate Best Practices and Lessons Learned • April 2009: Pilot office • July 2009: 5 FRCs • Oct 2009: 3 largest offices • Supported by ACCESS Customer Service Center

  11. What is ACCESS • Centralized contact center • Extension of HHSA’s Family Resource Centers • Serves customers and providers (CW, MC, FS, GR, CAPI) • ACCESS staff have same qualifications as FRC staff and take case actions

  12. ACCESS Calls by Program

  13. Implementation • Implementation of Same Day in all FRCs – completed in Nov 2009 • Self-Service functionality in April 2010 for ACCESS • “No Wrong Door” policy

  14. Key Accomplishments

  15. Key Accomplishments • Met increasing demand for public assistance without increasing staff • Reduced wait times for an intake interview • Reduced variation in service • Increased productivity and efficiency • Improved customer service training for eligibility staff

  16. Meeting Increasing Demand

  17. Improving Timely Application Processing

  18. Outcomes: Productivity & Satisfaction • According to UCSD’s Final Evaluation Report, the BPR project: • Improved productivity by 39% (original goal was 20-25%) • Improved client satisfaction by 22%

  19. Outcomes: Partnerships • Full implementation of the Face to Face Waiver allowed working with partners in new ways: • Open pathways to apply • By Phone through San Diego 2-1-1 • Community Partners • Benefits CalWIN

  20. Lessons Learned The BPR development/implementation process included plans for frequent communication, balancing staffing, and technology enhancements as well as avenues to engage community partners. Looking back additional suggestions: • Communication • Additional Community Involvement • Technology and Staffing

  21. Next Steps: Questions?

More Related