1 / 21

Objectives:

Objectives:. Introduction to Item Analysis. To begin to understand how to identify items that should be improved or eliminated. Item Analysis. No item is perfect. An item might be ambiguous, too simple, too difficult, or non-discriminating.

willien
Download Presentation

Objectives:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Objectives: • Introduction to Item Analysis • To begin to understand how to identify items that should be improved or eliminated.

  2. Item Analysis • No item is perfect. • An item might be ambiguous, too simple, too difficult, or non-discriminating. • Non-discriminating means the item can not be used to measure individual differences on the trait that is measured by the test.

  3. Achievement Tests • Item analysis can help diagnose student errors. • It can help improve the quality of tests. • It can lead to instructional improvements.

  4. Achievement Tests • Item analysis can identify problems with the answer key on a teacher-made test, or problems with the machine scoring on a standardized test. • It can help isolate items where the students “guessed” a lot.

  5. The Basic Indexes of Item Analysis • Difficulty – What percentage of respondents got the item “right” or indicated that they possess the trait being measured? • Discrimination – The extent to which the item differentiates between persons with high and low scores on the test.

  6. The Basic Indexes of Item Analysis • Difficulty – Measured by a simple percentage. • Discrimination – Measured by the difference between high and low scoring groups on the proportion answering the “right” answer.

  7. Discrimination • Items that are poor discriminators should be eliminated or modified. • Balance content validity with construct validity. • High discrimination tends to increase reliability.

  8. Discrimination and Difficulty • Discrimination and difficulty are related. • With very difficult items it is harder to show high discrimination. • Balance purpose of assessment with the range of difficulty of items. • Generally .2 - .8 difficulty is desired.

  9. Discrimination • For educational achievment tests, you want to look at the discrimination for the “distractors” or wrong options on a multiple choice item. • Ideally, you want them to be selected mostly by the low scoring respondents.

  10. Discrimination • For Educational tests – • Form a 2 x 2 matrix that crosses “Right” vs. “Wrong” on the item by “High” vs. “Low” on the total score of the test. • High and Low can be determined by a median split, or by quartiles, taking the highest and lowest quartile.

  11. Discrimination • For Psychological tests – • Form a 2 x 2 matrix that crosses “High” vs. “Low” on the item by “High” vs. “Low” on the total score of the test. • High and Low can be determined by a median split, or by quartiles, taking the highest and lowest quartile.

  12. An Example from the PRI • “I am able to ask for emotional support.” • Part of the Social Resourcefulness Factor • Part of the Assistance in Relationships subscale.

  13. An Example from the PRI

  14. An Example from the PRI

  15. An Example from the PRI

  16. An Example from the PRI

  17. An Example from the PRI

  18. An Example from the PRI

  19. An Example from the PRI

  20. An Example from the PRI

  21. An Example from the PRI

More Related