1 / 18

The evolution of a research project: an n-of-1 study

The evolution of a research project: an n-of-1 study. Lori Davis, Grace Han, Nicole Therrien, Bethany Vogts Project Mentor-Dr. Mary Schroeder. Outline. Outline. Project Overview. Original project Adherence to oral anti-cancer medications Current project

Download Presentation

The evolution of a research project: an n-of-1 study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The evolution of a research project: an n-of-1 study Lori Davis, Grace Han, Nicole Therrien, Bethany Vogts Project Mentor-Dr. Mary Schroeder

  2. Outline

  3. Outline

  4. Project Overview • Original project • Adherence to oral anti-cancer medications • Current project • Evaluation of research as scientific endeavor

  5. Outline

  6. This will be a word cloud I can't get it to work in the online powerpoint

  7. Outline

  8. Our study barriers  • Access to data  • Time  • Stalled pilot grant • Availability of resources 

  9. Outline

  10. Financial barriers • Grant is denied • Funding runs out • Can result in personnel changes • Higher project costs than anticipated • Interests of funders

  11. Personnel barriers  • School/work schedule • Family schedule • Collaborators move to another institution • Gain/lose a graduate student • Training of lab staff

  12. Internal factors • Lack of guidance  • Communication  • Differing levels of interest  • No clear research question • Not easily answered questions

  13. External Factors • Participation • Inaccessible data • Survey responses  • Training of staff • Someone else beat you to it • Hypothesis was incorrect  • Poor research design

  14. Outline

  15. Why does this matter? Blümle A., Meerpohl J.J., Schumacher M., von Elm E. (2016) Fate of Clinical Research Studies After Ethical Approval—Follow-Up of Study Protocols Until Publication. In: Strech D., Mertz M. (eds) Ethics and Governance of Biomedical Research. Research Ethics Forum, vol 4. Springer, Cham​

  16. Why does this matter? Kyle W. Osborne, Kelsey M. Woods, Whitney D. Maxwell, Karen McGee, and P. Brandon Bookstaver (2018). Outcomes of Student-Driven, Faculty-Mentored Research and Impact on Postgraduate Training and Career Selection. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education: Volume 82, Issue 4, Article 6246.

  17. Outline

  18. Conclusions • Personal investment and hard work will not always pay off regarding publishing • Research is important for students, but there are significant barriers that can prevent or stall the completion of research • It is important to consider potential barriers before starting research

More Related