national and eu identity public opinion democracy
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
National and EU Identity, Public Opinion & Democracy

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 11

Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

National and EU Identity, Public Opinion & Democracy. Markus Thiel, Ph.D. Dept. of Politics and International Relations Florida International University. Introduction. Before EU, Europe as birthplace of modern nationalism Europeans today have many commonalities:

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Introduction' - wallis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
national and eu identity public opinion democracy
National and EU Identity, Public Opinion & Democracy
  • Markus Thiel, Ph.D.
  • Dept. of Politics and International Relations
  • Florida International University
  • Before EU, Europe as birthplace of modern nationalism
  • Europeans today have many commonalities:
    • mixed economy & welfare states
    • common historical determinants
    • common attitudes toward life
  • + ‘Critical junctures’ of the Maastricht Treaty provisions (1992/93): Euro, CFSP, citizenship
  • A dichotomy between EU supporters and opponents visible ( e.g. with rejection of the constitution/Lisbon Treaty, ‘post-Maastricht Blues’ and current ‘identity crisis of the EU’)
identity as a social concept
Identity as a social concept
  • Diverse and often generalizing, undifferentiated use of theoretical constructs such as collective ID, nation
  • Matters on an individual and group level
  • (Social) identity is essentially a categorization framework made up of sets of comparisons and contrasts used to emphasize distinctions among groups (‘us’ against ‘them’)
collective identities theorized
Collective identities theorized
  • 2 basic camps regarding the general logic of identity-formation: essentialists & modernists
  • Essentialists/Primordialists(Connor, Smith): Ethnic nationalism as an expression of the eternal and essential constituents of collective identities

– sceptical about European Identity

  • Modernists/Constructivists (Anderson, Gellner): emphasize fluidity of ID, social learning & mobilization & theorize civic nationalism as an elite-driven project for nation-building

- optimistic about Eur Identity

theory literature
Theory & Literature
  • European ID consists of cultural and civic aspects of a pan-European common identification (Bruter)
  • Cultural aspects/ID recognize(s) the common history and cultural commonalities, though the extent of this is disputed (McCormick) – ‘shared heritage argument’
  • Civic ID builds upon the Member States’ liberal-democratic governance (HR, democracy, welfare & tolerance) and the EU’s integration measures (internal homogenization & differentiation)
consequences for european id
Consequences for European ID?
  • Blended model most appropriate one:
  • EU membership leads to an identity change which impacts upon the previous national identity
  • Since EU membership identity then interacts with rather different national identity constructions, the overall effect will not be homogenous leading to a generalized EU identity but rather, we find (27) nationalized European identities
  • (different meanings of what ‘Europe’ means in different countries e.g. France, Germany, UK, Ireland etc.)
  • Absence of popular support for the EU (only half of EU-27 support membership and identify with the EU)
  • Democratic deficit (=lack of democratic input by citizens)
  • Knowledge & participation deficits (EP elections)
  • ‘Euronationalism’, ‘Superstate Europe‘
  • Devolution & Stateness problems
  • Constitutional problems
  • Important: to recognize the idea and reality of European identity, ideological component (Delanty)
public opinion eb 70 fall 2008
Public opinion (EB 70, Fall 2008)
  • The three main indicators covering the general attitudes towards the EU – the support for EU membership (53%) and the image of the EU (45%) – have either remained stable or declined slightly since 2006.
  • 2006: 46% of citizens support further enlargement of the EU in future years and 42% oppose it
  • For EU citizens, the three values which represent best what the EU is, are human rights (38%), democracy (38%) and peace (36%).
the future of transnationalism democracy in the eu
The future of transnationalism & democracy in the EU
  • The upcoming EP elections serve as signifier for the degree of civic engagement with the EU & its pro/contra-position reg. EU: the EP evolving into a truly representative body?
  • Enlargements weakens the dominant Anglo-Franco-German position but produces disunity among institutions & fears among EU citizens: broadening vs. deepening?
  • The Lisbon Treaty, rejected by the Irish who thus block reform for the rest of Europe, aims at balancing (more) supranational integration and national interests & strengthening of external face: an end of national vs. European interests?
  • (More) Democracy, Delivery, Diversity, Dreams needed?