1 / 12

SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule

SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule. February 21, 2008. Overview . Background on transportation conformity SAFETEA-LU’s changes to Clean Air Act transportation conformity provisions EPA’s final rule of January 24, 2008. Background: Conformity.

vinaya
Download Presentation

SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008

  2. Overview • Background on transportation conformity • SAFETEA-LU’s changes to Clean Air Act transportation conformity provisions • EPA’s final rule of January 24, 2008

  3. Background: Conformity • Clean Air Act section 176(c) requires federally funded or approved transportation plans, programs, and projects to not: • produce new air quality violations • worsen existing violations, or • delay timely attainment of standards • Required only in nonattainment and maintenance areas for transportation-related pollutants (ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide)

  4. What is subject to transportation conformity? • Transportation plan: 20-year timeframe • Transportation improvement programs (TIPs): 4-year timeframe now • “Federal” projects: those which • Receive FHWA or FTA funding • Require FHWA or FTA approval • Impacts of regionally significant non-federal projects also included in plan/TIP conformity prior to approval, but no project-level conformity determination

  5. Background: SAFETEA-LU and Conformity • SAFETEA-LU enacted August 2005, and its conformity changes applied upon its enactment • EPA and DOT issued a joint interim guidance February 2006 for use prior to our rule • EPA’s final rule, published January 24, 2008, covers 6 changes addressed by SAFETEA-LU • Final rule is consistent with interim guidance and practice to date

  6. Frequency • SAFETEA-LU changed CAA’s required frequency of conformity determinations for transportation plans and TIPs from at least every 3 years to every 4 years • EPA’s final rule: Same as above • SAFETEA-LU also changed frequency of transportation plan and TIP updates to every 4 years • Not a CAA change, but a transportation planning change • Frequency of plans, TIPs, and conformity aligned

  7. Deadline for Conformity When New Budget Established • SAFETEA-LU amended CAA to give 2 years to make a conformity determination when a new state air quality plan (SIP) budget is established • Previously, conformity rule gave 18 months • EPA’s final rule: same as above

  8. Conformity Lapse Grace Period • SAFETEA-LU amended CAA by: • Establishing a 12-month lapse grace period that applies when a required conformity deadline is missed • EPA’s final rule: • When a conformity deadline is missed, a lapse would occur only after a 12-month grace period • During the grace period, projects could be found to conform if they were included in the most recent conforming plan and TIP

  9. Shortening Timeframe of Conformity Determination • SAFETEA-LU changed CAA to allow MPOs to elect to shorten the period of time covered by a conformity determination • MPOs must consult state and local air quality agencies and solicit & consider public comment when making election • Shortened conformity timeframe must be the longest of: • The first 10 years of the transportation plan • The latest year that a SIP establishes a budget • The year after the completion date of a project that is included in the TIP or needs approval before next conformity determination • Maintenance areas with an adequate/approved second 10-year maintenance plan: shortened timeframe is through end of second maintenance plan • EPA’s final rule: same as above. EPA’s rule gives this flexibility to isolated rural areas as well.

  10. Conformity SIPs • A conformity SIP contains state and local procedures for conformity (rather than budgets or control measures). Once approved, it applies instead of Federal conformity rule for any aspects it covers • SAFETEA-LU changed CAA’s conformity SIP requirements. State’s conformity SIP needs to include only 3 provisions, instead of entire federal conformity rule: • Consultation procedures – 93.105 • The 2 provisions where conformity rule requires state conformity SIPs to require “written commitments” – when measures are included in analyses (93.122(a)(4) and 93.125(c)) • EPA’s final rule: same as above • EPA is also revising its 2004 conformity SIP guidance to be consistent with the final rule

  11. TCM Substitutions and Additions • SAFETEA-LU changed CAA to allow TCMs to be substituted or added to an approved SIP without a formal SIP revision • Statute includes sufficient detail to implement; therefore, no need for regulations • EPA is also updating guidance for TCM substitution and addition (currently covered in Feb 2006 interim guidance)

  12. For more information: • www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/index.htm “Regulations” link on above page includes: • EPA’s final SAFETEA-LU rule and fact sheet • Transportation conformity regulations, as updated by SAFETEA-LU rule • Clean Air Act section 176(c) as amended by SAFETEA-LU • Current guidances that cover TCM substitution and conformity SIPs – soon to be updated

More Related