1 / 43

VHDL-AMS Simulation of RF Mixed-Signal Communication Systems

VHDL-AMS Simulation of RF Mixed-Signal Communication Systems. Erik C. Normark MSCAD Lab. Outline. Background and Motivation Design of Mixed-Signal Systems VHDL-AMS Basics Design Tools Simple BPSK Model System Design Simulation Results π/4 DQPSK Model Basic System Design

vian
Download Presentation

VHDL-AMS Simulation of RF Mixed-Signal Communication Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. VHDL-AMS Simulation of RF Mixed-Signal Communication Systems Erik C. Normark MSCAD Lab

  2. Outline • Background and Motivation • Design of Mixed-Signal Systems • VHDL-AMS Basics • Design Tools • Simple BPSK Model • System Design • Simulation Results • π/4 DQPSK Model • Basic System Design • Design with Viterbi Encoding • Summary and Conclusions

  3. Design of Mixed Signal Systems • Increasing demand for System-On-Chip • RF, analog, digital circuits all on one chip • Fast time-to-market issues • Less established analog automated design process • Bottom-up design approach common • VHDL-AMS promotes multiple abstraction layers • facilitates mixed design approach • Behavioral model refined until physical transistor-level implementation reached • Promotes re-use of architectural code

  4. Motivation • Create a mixed-signal, system-level model of a high-frequency transceiver in VHDL-AMS • Ability to measure system performance Through Bit-error-rate (BER) analysis • Compare results of VHDL-AMS simulations with other available mixed-signal modeling environments.

  5. VHDL-AMS Language Basics • Extension of VHDL standard • Adds support for DAE’s and conservative quantities • Supports description and simulation of analog, digital, mixed signal, multi-physics devices • Encourages device modeling at various architecture levels (ideal, non-linear, transistor)

  6. Design Tools • ADVance-MS (ADMS) • Compiler and simulator for VHDL, VHDL-AMS, Verilog, Verilog-A, SPICE, C • Supports most of VHDL-AMS standard • No support for file I/O, Procedural, frequency-domain noise • Agilent ADS • Commercial RF design environment for system-level design modeling and simulation

  7. BPSK System • Evaluate system performance via comparison to theoretical BER calculation • Ideal System Architecture • Transmitter • Noisy Channel • Receiver • BER Calculation

  8. How Ideal? • Oscillator: V==10**(A/20.0)*cos(math_2_pi*f*now + Ph); • PA and LNA: vo == vi*10**(gain/20.0); • Mixer: vout==v1 * v2;

  9. BPSK : Transmitter • Modulate data by shifting phase of oscillator between ±180o

  10. BPSK Transmitted Spectrum

  11. BPSK : Propagation Channel • Basic channel with variable Additive White Gaussian Noise Power • Can expand this architecture to include delay spread • Box-Muller transformation of two uniform, independent random variables

  12. WGN Generator Process noise_calc : process (noise_s) variable s1 : positive := seed1; variable s2 : positive := seed2; variable x1,x2 : real; -- Uniform random variables begin UNIFORM(s1,s2,x1); -- create two uniform variables UNIFORM(s1,s2,x2); -- create Gaussian variable using Box-Muller method noise_s <= SQRT(-2.0*LOG(x1))*COS(2.0*MATH_PI*x2) after rate; end process noise_calc; vo == 10.0**(level/20.0)*noise_s;

  13. AWGN Testing

  14. BPSK : Received Spectrum

  15. BPSK : Receiver • Normally Requires coherent detection • Uses original oscillator from transmitter blocks to bypass this requirement • Design verification only

  16. BER Calculation • Good estimate of system performance in the presence of noise • Used Monte Carlo method to measure BER • Sequence of Bernoulli trials • Minimum knowledge of system required

  17. BPSK : BER Calculations Theoretical BER : Pb : Probability of a bit error (BER) ρb : Power level of bit (Eb/No)

  18. BER : Confidence Intervals

  19. BPSK : Results

  20. Basic π/4 DQPSK System • Ideal System and Architecture • No coherent demodulator required • Less complex receiver implementation • Better spectral characteristics than QPSK, BPSK • Standard for US and Japanese cell phones

  21. π/4 DQPSK : Transmitter • Parallelize Data • Map Symbols • Pulse Shape • Up-convert and amplify

  22. Signal Constellation • Directly map a pair of input bits onto relative phases (±π/4, ±3π/4)

  23. 01 00 11 11 Example Transmit: 00111101

  24. Symbol Mapping

  25. Symbol Mapping Code • Uses state machine to implement: • Initial state must be on constellation point

  26. Transmitted Constellation

  27. Transmitted Spectrum

  28. π/4 DQPSK : Receiver • Four Steps: • Amplify and down-convert • Filter • Demodulate and recover symbol clock • Digitize and Serialize

  29. Received Spectrum

  30. Received Constellation: Low Noise

  31. Received Constellation: High Noise

  32. IQ Demodulation

  33. IQ Demodulator Code -- Perform A, B recovery Ip == Ik'delayed(Tsym); Qp == Qk'delayed(Tsym); Atemp == Qk*Qp+Ik*Ip; Btemp == Ip*Qk-Ik*Qp; • To recover parallel data, pass Atemp and Btemp through threshold detector • Digitize, Serialize

  34. Symbol Timing Recovery • Squaring and adding I, Q channels produces tone at symboling frequency • High-Q BPF isolates tone • Threshold detector creates std_logic clock at symbol frequency • transitions in middle of bit period • More complex : feed BPF signal through PLL • more noise-immune

  35. π/4 DQPSK : Viterbi Encoder / Decoder • Added a simple rate 3/10 Viterbi encoder • Decreases BER • Increases design size x2 • Half clock rate and removal of serial to parallel conversion

  36. Viterbi Encoder • Rate 2/3 encoder (K=3) • Operates on 3 input bits and two bits from cleared register • Produces specific 10 output bits • Less complex Decoder

  37. Viterbi Decoder • Implemented as state machine • Makes decision on correct 3-bit output after 10 bits received • Less complex but less error tolerant • Large code size

  38. BER with Pulse-Shaping Filters

  39. BER With Viterbi Encoder

  40. Summary of Results • Basic coverage of VHDL-AMS language • BPSK design example • Similar results to theoretical and HP-ADS • Verified noise modeling technique • Small, highly ideal model • π/4 DQPSK design • BER closely matches Agilent ADS and theoretical curves • Increased model complexity with encoder / decoder • Verifies that complete system modeling can be easily performed in VHDL-AMS

  41. Extensions of Research • Increase complexity of model to include non-linear effects in subsystems • Add delay-spread model to propagation channel for multi-path simulation • Continue iterative design process

  42. Acknowledgements Special thanks to: Dr. Richard Shi and MSCAD Lab RF group members Pavel Nikitin, Cherry Wakayama, Lei Yang

  43. Questions?

More Related