7 1 7 4 hypotheses tests for means
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
7.1 – 7.4: Hypotheses tests for means

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 51

7.1 – 7.4: Hypotheses tests for means - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

7.1 – 7.4: Hypotheses tests for means. Objective: To test claims about inferences for means, under specific conditions. Hypotheses. Hypotheses are working models that we adopt temporarily. Our starting hypothesis is called the null hypothesis .

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' 7.1 – 7.4: Hypotheses tests for means' - verne

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
7 1 7 4 hypotheses tests for means
7.1 – 7.4: Hypotheses tests for means

Objective: To test claims about inferences for means, under specific conditions

  • Hypotheses are working models that we adopt temporarily.
  • Our starting hypothesis is called the null hypothesis.
  • The null hypothesis, that we denote by H0, specifies a population model parameter of interest and proposes a value for that parameter.
  • We usually write down the null hypothesis in the form
  • H0: parameter = hypothesizedvalue.
  • The alternative hypothesis, which we denote by HA, contains the values of the parameter that we consider plausible if we reject the null hypothesis.
hypotheses cont
Hypotheses (Cont.)
  • The null hypothesis,specifies a population model parameter of interest and proposes a value for that parameter.
    • We might have, for example, H0: µ= 20.
  • We want to compare our data to what we would expect given that H0 is true.
    • We can do this by finding out how many standard deviations away from the proposed value we are.
  • We then ask how likely it is to get results like we did if the null hypothesis were true.
consider trials
Consider Trials
  • Think about the logic of jury trials:
    • To prove someone is guilty, we start by assuming they are innocent.
    • We retain that hypothesis (null hypothesis) until the facts make it unlikely beyond a reasonable doubt.
    • Then, and only then, we reject the (null) hypothesis of innocence and declare the person guilty.
consider trials cont
Consider Trials (cont.)
  • The same logic used in jury trials is used in statistical tests of hypotheses:
    • We begin by assuming that a hypothesis is true.
    • Next we consider whether the data are consistent with the hypothesis.
    • If they are, all we can do is retain the hypothesis we started with. If they are not, then like a jury, we ask whether they are unlikely beyond a reasonable doubt.
alternative hypotheses
Alternative hypotheses
  • There are three possible alternative hypotheses:
      • HA: parameter < hypothesized value
      • HA: parameter ≠ hypothesized value
      • HA: parameter > hypothesized value
alternative hypotheses cont
Alternative hypotheses (cont.)
  • HA: parameter ≠ valueis known as a two-sided alternative because we are equally interested in deviations on either side of the null hypothesis value.
  • For two-sided alternatives, the P-value is the probability of deviating in either direction from the null hypothesis value.
alternative hypotheses cont1
Alternative hypotheses (cont.)
  • The other two alternative hypotheses are called one-sided alternatives.
  • A one-sided alternative focuses on deviations from the null hypothesis value in only one direction.
  • Thus, the P-value for one-sided alternatives is the probability of deviating only in the direction of the alternative away from the null hypothesis value.
p values
  • The statistical twist is that we can quantify our level of doubt.
    • We can use the model proposed by our hypothesis to calculate the probability that the event we have witnessed could happen.
    • That is just the probability we’re looking for—it quantifies exactly how surprised we are to see our results.
    • This probability is called a P-value.
p values cont
P-Values (cont.)
  • When the data are consistent with the model from the null hypothesis, the P-value is high and we are unable to reject the null hypothesis.
    • In that case, we have to “retain” the null hypothesis we started with.
    • We can’t claim to have proved it; instead we “fail to reject the null hypothesis” when the data are consistent with the null hypothesis model and in line with what we would expect from natural sampling variability.
  • If the P-value is low enough, we’ll “reject the null hypothesis,” since what we observed would be very unlikely were the null model true.
p values return to trials
P-Values: Return to Trials
  • If the evidence is not strong enough to reject the presumption of innocent, the jury returns with a verdict of “not guilty.”
    • The jury does not say that the defendant is innocent.
    • All it says is that there is not enough evidence to convict, to reject innocence.
    • The defendant may, in fact, be innocent, but the jury has no way to be sure.
p values return to trials cont
P-Values: Return to Trials (cont.)
  • Said statistically, we will fail to rejectthe null hypothesis.
    • We never declare the null hypothesis to be true, because we simply do not know whether it’s true or not.
    • Sometimes in this case we say that the null hypothesis has been retained.
  • A research team wants to know if aspirin helps to thin blood. The null hypothesis says that it doesn’t. They test 12 patients, observe their mean blood levels, given baseline data, and get a P-value of 0.32. They proclaim that aspirin doesn’t work. What would you say?
  • A weight loss drug has been tested and found the mean weight loss of patients in a large clinical trial. Now the scientists want to see if the new, improved version works even better. What would the null hypothesis be?
  • The new drug is tested and the P-value is 0.0001. What would you conclude about the new drug?
thinking about p values
Thinking about p-values
  • A P-value is a conditional probability—the probability of the observed statistic given that the null hypothesis is true.
    • The P-value is NOT the probability that the null hypothesis is true.
    • It’s not even the conditional probability that null hypothesis is true given the data.
  • Be careful to interpret the P-value correctly.
thinking about p values cont
Thinking about p-values (cont.)
  • When we see a small P-value, we could continue to believe the null hypothesis and conclude that we just witnessed a rare event. But instead, we trust the data and use it as evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
  • However big P-values just mean what we observed isn’t surprising. That is, the results are now in line with our assumption that the null hypothesis models the world, so we have no reason to reject it.
alpha levels
Alpha levels
  • Sometimes we need to make a firm decision about whether or not to reject the null hypothesis.
  • When the P-value is small, it tells us that our data are rare given the null hypothesis.
  • How rare is “rare”?
alpha levels cont
Alpha levels (cont.)
  • We can define “rare event” arbitrarily by setting a threshold for our P-value.
    • If our P-value falls below that point, we’ll reject H0. We call such results statistically significant.
    • The threshold is called analpha level, denoted by .
alpha levels cont1
Alpha levels (cont.)
  • Common alpha levels are 0.10, 0.05, and 0.01.
    • You have the option—almost the obligation—to consider your alpha level carefully and choose an appropriate one for the situation.
  • The alpha level is also called the significance level.
    • When we reject the null hypothesis, we say that the test is “significant at that level.”
alpha levels cont2
Alpha levels (cont.)
  • What can you say if the P-value does not fall below ?
    • You should say that “The data have failed to provide sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.”
    • Don’t say that you “accept the null hypothesis.”
    • Recall that, in a jury trial, if we do not find the defendant guilty, we say the defendant is “not guilty”—we don’t say that the defendant is “innocent.”
alpha levels cont3
Alpha levels (cont.)
  • The P-value gives the reader far more information than just stating that you reject or fail to reject the null.
  • In fact, by providing a P-value to the reader, you allow that person to make his or her own decisions about the test.
    • What you consider to be statistically significant might not be the same as what someone else considers statistically significant.
    • There is more than one alpha level that can be used, but each test will give only one P-value.
statistically significant
Statistically significant
  • What do we mean when we say that a test is statistically significant?
    • All we mean is that the test statistic had aP-value lower than our alpha level.
  • Don’t be lulled into thinking that statistical significance carries with it any sense of practical importance or impact.
reasoning of hypothesis testing
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing
  • There are four basic parts to a hypothesis test:
      • Hypotheses
      • Model
      • Mechanics
      • Conclusion
  • Let’s look at these parts in detail…
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • 1. Hypotheses
    • The null hypothesis: To perform a hypothesis test, we must first translate our question of interest into a statement about model parameters.
      • In general, we have
      • H0: parameter = hypothesized value.
    • The alternative hypothesis: The alternative hypothesis, HA, contains the values of the parameter we consider plausible when we reject the null.
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont1
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Model
    • To plan a statistical hypothesis test, specify the model you will use to test the null hypothesis and the parameter of interest.
    • All models require assumptions, so state the assumptions and check any corresponding conditions.
    • Your conditions should conclude with a statement such as:
      • Because the conditions are satisfied, I can model the sampling distribution of the proportion with a Normal model.
      • Watch out, though. It might be the case that your model step ends with “Because the conditions are not satisfied, I can’t proceed with the test.” If that’s the case, stop and reconsider (proceed with caution)
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont2
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Model
    • Don’t forget to name your test!
    • The test about means is called a one-sample t-test.
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont3
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Model (cont.)
  • One-sample t-test for the mean
  • The conditions for the one-sample t-test for the mean are the same as for the one-sample t-interval.
  • We test the hypothesis H0:  = 0using the statistic
  • The standard errorof the sample meanis
  • When the conditions are met and the null hypothesis is true, this statistic follows a Student’s t model with n – 1 df. We use that model to obtain a P-value.
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont4
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Model (cont.)
  • Finding the P-Value
  • Either use the table provided, or you may use your calculator:
    • normalcdf( is used for z-scores (if you know )
    • tcdf( is used for critical t-values (when you use s to estimate )
      • 2nd Distribution
      • tcdf(lower bound, upper bound, degrees of freedom)
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont5
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Mechanics
    • Under “mechanics” we place the actual calculation of our test statistic from the data.
    • Different tests will have different formulas and different test statistics.
    • Usually, the mechanics are handled by a statistics program or calculator, but it’s good to know the formulas.
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont6
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Mechanics (continued)
  • The ultimate goal of the calculation is to obtain a P-value.
      • The P-value is the probability that the observed statistic value (or an even more extreme value) could occur if the null model were correct.
      • If the P-value is small enough, we’ll reject the null hypothesis.
      • Note: The P-value is a conditional probability—it’s the probability that the observed results could have happened if the null hypothesis is true.
reasoning of hypothesis testing cont7
Reasoning of Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Conclusion
    • The conclusion in a hypothesis test is always a statement about the null hypothesis.
    • The conclusion must state either that we reject or that we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
    • And, as always, the conclusion should be stated in context.
steps for hypothesis testing
Steps for Hypothesis testing
  • Check Conditions and show that you have checked these!
    • Random Sample: Can we assume this?
    • 10% Condition: Do you believe that your sample size is less than 10% of the population size?
    • Nearly Normal:
      • If you have raw data, graph a histogram to check to see if it is approximatelysymmetric and sketch the histogram on your paper.
      • If you do not have raw data, check to see if the problem states that the distribution is approximately Normal.
steps for hypothesis testing cont
Steps for Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • State the test you are about to conduct
    • Ex) One-Sample t-Test for Means
  • Set up your hypotheses
  • H0:
  • HA:
  • Calculate your test statistic
  • Draw a picture of your desired area under the t-model, and calculate your P-value.
steps for hypothesis testing cont1
Steps for Hypothesis testing (cont.)
  • Make your conclusion.
  • When your P-value is small enough (or below α, if given), reject the null hypothesis.
  • When your P-value is not small enough, fail to reject the null hypothesis.
calculator tips
Calculator tips
  • Given a set of data:
    • Enter data into L1
    • Set up STATPLOT to create a histogram to check the nearly Normal condition
    • STAT  TESTS  2:T-Test
    • Choose Stored Data, then specify your data list (usually L1)
    • Enter the mean of the null model and indicate where the data are (>, <, or )
  • Given sample mean and standard deviation:
    • STAT  TESTS  2:T-Test
    • Choose Stats  enter
    • Specify the hypothesized mean and sample statistics
    • Specify the tail (>, <, or )
    • Calculate
example 1
Example 1
  • A company has set a goal of developing a battery that lasts over 5 hours (300 minutes) in continuous use. A first test of 12 of these batteries measured the following lifespans (in minutes): 321, 295, 332, 351, 281, 336, 311, 253, 270, 326, 311, and288.Is there evidence that the company has met its goal?
example 1 continued
Example 1 (continued)
  • Find a 90% confidence interval for the mean lifespan of this type of battery.
example 2 partners
Example 2 (Partners)
  • Cola makers test new recipes for loss of sweetness during storage. Trained tasters rate the sweetness before and after storage. Here are the sweetness losses (sweetness before storage minus sweetness after storage) found by 10 tasters for one new cola recipe:
  • Are these data good evidence that the cola lost sweetness?
example 3
Example 3
  • Psychology experiments sometimes involve testing the ability of rats to navigate mazes. The mazes are classified according to difficulty, as measured by the mean length of time it takes rats to find the food at the end. One researcher needs a maze that will take the rats an average of about one minutes to solve. He tests one maze on several rats, collecting the data shown. Test the hypothesis that the mean completion time for this maze is 60 seconds at an alpha level of 0.05. What is your conclusion?
confidence intervals hypothesis tests
Confidence intervals & Hypothesis tests
  • Confidence intervals and hypothesis tests are built from the same calculations.
    • They have the same assumptions and conditions.
  • You can approximate a hypothesis test by examining a confidence interval.
    • Just ask whether the null hypothesis value is consistent with a confidence interval for the parameter at the corresponding confidence level.
confidence intervals hypothesis tests cont
Confidence intervals & Hypothesis tests (cont.)
  • Because confidence intervals are two-sided, they correspond to two-sided tests.
    • In general, a confidence interval with a confidence level of C% corresponds to a two-sided hypothesis test with an -level of
    • 100 – C%.
  • The relationship between confidence intervals and one-sided hypothesis tests is a little more complicated.
    • A confidence interval with a confidence level of C% corresponds to a one-sided hypothesis test with an -level of ½(100 – C)%.
making errors
Making Errors
  • Here’s some shocking news for you: nobody’s perfect. Even with lots of evidence we can still make the wrong decision.
  • When we perform a hypothesis test, we can make mistakes in two ways:
    • The null hypothesis is true, but we mistakenly reject it.
    • (Type I error)
    • II. The null hypothesis is false, but we fail to reject it.
    • (Type II error)
making errors cont
Making Errors (cont.)
  • Which type of error is more serious depends on the situation at hand. In other words, the importance of the error is context dependent.
  • Here’s an illustration of the four situations in a hypothesis test:
making errors cont1
Making Errors (cont.)
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7fZXEW4mpA
  • What type of error was made?
  • How about OJ Simpson?
making errors cont2
Making Errors (cont.)
  • How often will a Type I error occur?
    • A Type I error is rejecting a true null hypothesis. To reject the null hypothesis, the P-value must fall below . Therefore, when the null is true, that happens exactly with a probability of . Thus, the probability of a Type I error is our  level.
  • When H0 is false and we reject it, we have done the right thing.
    • A test’s ability to detect a false null hypothesis is called the powerof the test.
making errors cont3
Making Errors (cont.)
  • When H0 is false and we fail to reject it, we have made a Type II error.
    • We assign the letter to the probability of this mistake.
    • It’s harder to assess the value of  because we don’t know what the value of the parameter really is.
    • When the null hypothesis is true, it specifies a single parameter value, H0: parameter = hypothesized value.
    • When the null hypothesis is false, we do not have a specific parameter; we have many possible values.
    • There is no single value for  --we can think of a whole collection of ’s, one for each incorrect parameter value.
making errors cont4
Making Errors (cont.)
  • One way to focus our attention on a particular  is to think about the effect size.
    • Ask “How big a difference would matter?”
  • We could reduce  for all alternative parameter values by increasing .
    • This would reduce  but increase the chance of a Type I error.
    • This tension between Type I and Type II errors is inevitable.
  • The only way to reduce both types of errors is to collect more data. Otherwise, we just wind up trading off one kind of error against the other.
power of the test
Power of the test
  • The powerof a test is the probability that it correctly rejects a false null hypothesis.
  • The power of a test is 1 –  ; because  is the probability that a test fails to reject a false null hypothesis and power is the probability that it does reject.
  • Whenever a study fails to reject its null hypothesis, the test’s power comes into question.
  • When we calculate power, we imagine that the null hypothesis is false.
power of the test cont
Power of the test (cont.)
  • The value of the power depends on how far the truth lies from the null hypothesis value.
    • The distance between the null hypothesis value, 0, and the truth, , is called the effect size.
    • Power depends directly on effect size. It is easier to see larger effects, so the farther is from 0, the greater the power.
  • Day 1: 7.1-7.4-Set A Book Page (Same as 6.5 B Book Page) # 1 - 5
  • 7.1-7.4-Set B Book Page (Same as 6.1 – 6.4 Book Page) # 23, 24
  • Day 2: 7.1-7.4-Set B Book Page (Same as 6.1 – 6.4 Book Page) # 1cd, 2cd, 29, 30, 33, 35
  • Day 3: 7.1-7.4-Set B Book Page (Same as 6.1 – 6.4 Book Page) # 22, 25 – 28, 34