1 / 17

Georgia’s Active Engagement Process GCASE November 14, 2013 Martha Hackney

Georgia’s Active Engagement Process GCASE November 14, 2013 Martha Hackney GaDOE Special Education Services and Supports, Charre ’Nichole Moulton, Jenkins County, Derek Cone, Treutlen County.

ula
Download Presentation

Georgia’s Active Engagement Process GCASE November 14, 2013 Martha Hackney

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Georgia’s Active Engagement Process GCASE November 14, 2013 Martha Hackney GaDOE Special Education Services and Supports, Charre’Nichole Moulton, Jenkins County, Derek Cone, Treutlen County

  2. Georgia’s Disclaimer"One thing is sure. We have to do something. We have to do the best we know how at the moment . . . ; If it doesn't turn out right, we can modify it as we go along.“— Franklin D. Roosevelt

  3. Georgia’s Tiered Monitoring System ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT

  4. District General Supervision

  5. ….a collaborative effort of GaDOE working with a local district to facilitate improved practices and procedures that will lead to  improved student outcomes. Active Engagement

  6. ….a process whereby the GaDOE is setting goals a district must meet and directing districts to make improvements on areas the GaDOE feel are the most important. NOT

  7. Data Digging Process

  8. Active Engagement Process • Review Data and Identify LEA Desired Outcome = Compliant Practices and Improved Results

  9. Common Needs • Implementing Response to Intervention • Implementing PBIS • Developing and reviewing written procedures • Outlining a supervision/monitoring plan • Creating job embedded PL • Aligning the work with the priorities for all children

  10. Look what we have uncovered… Collaboration • Silos • Lack of General Supervision • Transitional Administration • Ineffective Leadership Technical Assistance Coaching Facilitate Awareness

  11. DISTRICTS HAVE DIVERSE NEEDS.DIFFERENTIATED PLANNING IS HARD WORK! It is also “heart” work!

  12. How will Districts be “engaged” during FY14? • Develop or revise IDEA Procedural Manual • Develop or revise Annual Professional Development Plan for IDEA Procedures • Develop or revise Monitoring Plan for IDEA • Identify local stakeholders for AE Team • Identify SMART Goals that align with the AE work ***2013 State Performance Goals and APR Summary Report

  13. Next Steps • Examination of Practices (Formal Monitoring) to Examine Compliant Practices • Timeline • Focus • Evidence, Documentation and/or Data • Required Stakeholders

  14. Old Process vs. New Process • Events driven • Logical assumptions • Immediate results • State-driven • State Capacity • Process driven • Root cause strategies • Long-term outcomes • District-driven • Local Capacity

  15. MULTI-YEAR PROCESS WITH SHORT-TERM BENCHMARKS THAT SUPPORT LONGTERM OUTCOMES Time and Outcomes

  16. Official Monitoring Parent Engagement End of Engagement Removal of Scaffolds

More Related