1 / 14

Don’t go back to the drawing board – share our experience with Blackboard! Becky Jones

Don’t go back to the drawing board – share our experience with Blackboard! Becky Jones. Background. Assistant Librarian supporting the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences De Montfort University Leicester and Bedford (UK) 3 campus university 6 faculties

tyler
Download Presentation

Don’t go back to the drawing board – share our experience with Blackboard! Becky Jones

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Don’t go back to the drawing board – share our experience with Blackboard! Becky Jones

  2. Background • Assistant Librarian supporting the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences • De Montfort University • Leicester and Bedford (UK) • 3 campus university • 6 faculties • Approximately 19000 students and 1600 staff

  3. Information skills via Blackboard • The initial Blackboard project in March 2005 was part of a Professional Skills module for Biomedical and Forensic Science students • There were 4 x one hour sessions in Library with assessment counting for 7% of module mark • The Blackboard group were taught alongside a control group where traditional methods were used for comparison.

  4. Traditional structure • How to tackle an assignment – emphasis on using OPAC • Using databases to find journal articles • Using the Internet for research • Creating reference lists & bibliographies

  5. Why Change? • Blackboard gives the opportunity to get the students more involved making the sessions fully interactive • Opportunity to keep the content but radically change the format therefore contextualising it • Marked assessments are worthwhile but time consuming for staff

  6. New Structure • Three sessions following the old structure - each with citation firmly embedded • Each session introduced by a brief lecture then students work through the Blackboard content following links to resources • Each session ends with a quick online quiz to test understanding and prepare for the assessment

  7. Online assessment • Controlled conditions – all students checked on register • Assessment made active for specific time slot and password protected • From a pool of 60, selected 12 questions for each group • Random generation of questions within the group

  8. Online assessment The mean marks for the assessments were: • CHEM1061 – 52.8% (Blackboard group) • PHCO1312 – 65% (Control group taught using traditional methods with a paper based assignment)

  9. Positive Experiences • Received a Vice-Chancellor Curriculum Development and Innovation Award (May 2005) • Students interacted really well with the technology, having two windows open to move between the library web pages and Blackboard with ease • Excellent student feedback:

  10. Student Feedback • “Found sessions very useful and they gave good, easy to find reference points.” • “The assessment on Blackboard was very user friendly and easy to understand.” • “The test was a good way of testing if we really knew about citation and how to use the internet and library for information”

  11. Negative Experiences • For this project, the content had to be created in Frontpage and the HTML code transferred to Blackboard for the use of fonts and colour • Fear of technology collapsing during a session –OPAC and PCs • Glitches – questions were set to display one at a time, if students Cancel rather than Submit, they are thrown out of the assessment

  12. Outcomes • Students were very comfortable with the Blackboard environment • Only one student posted something on Discussion Board but over 40 read it • All students turned up for the assessment, even those who had not attended previous sessions

  13. Outcomes • Marking for a class of 150 takes approximately 37 hours less than by traditional methods! • Module has also been developed for Year 2 Biomedical Sciences • Module can be easily customised for other subject areas, with or without assessment

  14. Project team Becky Jones (rjones@dmu.ac.uk) Jacqui Weetman (jweetman@dmu.ac.uk)

More Related