1 / 22

Sustaining Interactivity in Asynchronous Learning Environments

Sustaining Interactivity in Asynchronous Learning Environments. Maxine S. Cohen, Ph.D. Laurie P. Dringus, Ph.D. Timothy J. Ellis, Ph.D. Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale, FL Presentation for 7 th Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning November 2001. Outline of Talk.

tyanne
Download Presentation

Sustaining Interactivity in Asynchronous Learning Environments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sustaining Interactivity in Asynchronous Learning Environments Maxine S. Cohen, Ph.D. Laurie P. Dringus, Ph.D. Timothy J. Ellis, Ph.D. Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale, FL Presentation for 7th Sloan-C International Conference on Online Learning November 2001

  2. Outline of Talk • Background • Asynchronous Tools • Perspectives • Issues • Samples • Problems and pitfalls • Additional reflections • Conclusion • URLs and Reference list

  3. Background • Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences • Focus on Doctoral Program • 5 month terms • Hybrid Program • Some on campus time • Various Programs • Computing technology in education, Computer Information Systems, Information Systems, Computer Science

  4. Asynchronous Tools • Forums/Bulletin Board • Provided in many off-the-shelf systems • Allaire Forums with some customization • Provides threaded capability • Allows attachments

  5. Perspectives • 3 faculty members • Concentrate on our specific courses • Human-Computer Interaction • Multimedia Systems • Online Learning Environments • One-size fits all does not work

  6. Issues • Instructor involvement • Structure • Evaluation criteria • Forum weighting • Role forums play in course learning outcomes

  7. Instructor Involvement • Locus of control issue • Topics posted throughout term • Themes may be listed in advance or may not • Core set and current topics • Amount of involvement • Students input their comments • Nothing from professor • Professor on occasion chimes in • Heavy involvement • 2-3 per week, direct students • Provide system of checks and balances

  8. Structure • Professor is gatekeeper • Sets tone • Specific start/end dates • Depth • Backed up with references • More than opinions and idle chatter • Impact of size of class

  9. Evaluation Criteria • Quality and steady contributions • Reflect thought • On topic, well written, well supported, timely, and stimulates responses from others • Rubric • Strength • Support from literature • Responses generated • May want some non-credit bearing

  10. Forum Weighting • Ranges – 10 to 40% • Norm – 15 to 30%

  11. Role forums play in course learning outcomes • Sense of presence • Process part of learning • Create a learning community • Content part of learning • Repository of resources • Dynamic and current

  12. Samples • Learning outcome • Evaluate problem areas in the education field and analyze the appropriateness of a computerized database management system as a solution • Associated forum topic • Discuss an area of particular need in education which you think can be effectively addressed with a computerized database management system

  13. Samples • This is a response I recently posted in one of the threads entitled "Interaction": • "I think we have to look at the big picture here -- I assess the collective experience as well as the individual contributions. Afterall, the end result of the individual contributions is the collective experience of all. At the end of the day (term), what do we have? Have we examined the issues and do we walk away with new information/new perspectives?”

  14. Problems and Pitfalls • Improper use of forums • Abiding by letter, but not spirit of the rules • Contributions immediately before deadline • Flip around, contributions need to generate response • Talking without content • Require citations • Unsupported opinion has no value • Place for “around the watercooler”, general chat threads

  15. Problems and Pitfalls con’t • Technological problems • Downtime • Windows of opportunity • 5 week window, 24 hour down period, doesn’t justify 72 hour extension • Reasonable flexibility • Isolation • Need to build learning community • Inappropriate contributions

  16. Additional Reflections • Any time, any place learning doesn’t mean any pace • Pace set by instructor • Bios – include pictures and links • Learning experience has component how long it takes • 6 week reflection versus 1 week reflection • Broad versus in-depth

  17. Additional Reflections con’t • “I can generally say that I can predict the success or failure of a class in Forums within the first two weeks of the start of Forums. I can tell by the level of thinking (and writing) just what direction the interactions will go. Information is shared and absorbed. I can see this pattern carry over into the course assignments. Ideas that have been shared in the Forums are often presented in assignments as well.”

  18. Conclusion • More research needed • Additional studies on patterns of interaction in forums • Metrics and measurements • Determining quality • Breadth versus depth issues

  19. URLs • Maxine Cohen • http://www.scis.nova.edu/~cohenm • Laurie Dringus • http://scis.nova.edu/~laurie/dcte730.html • Tim Ellis • http://www.scis.nova.edu/~ellist

  20. Reference List • Cohen, M. S. and Ellis T. J. (2001). Teaching Technology in an Online, Distance Education Environment. Proceedings: Frontiers in Education Conference, Reno, NV. (T1F-1-T1F-6), Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. • Dringus, L.P. (2000, June). From both sides now. On being an online learner and an online professor. ACM e-Learn, http://www.elearnmag.org. • Dringus, L.P. (2000, November). Towards active online learning. A dramatic shift in perspective for learners. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4),189-195. • Harrison, N. and Bergen, C. (2000). Some design strategies for developing an online course. Educational Technology, 40(1), 57-60.

  21. Reference List con’t • Hiltz, S.R., Coppola, N., Turoff, M., and Benbunan-Fich, R. (2000). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Networks. http://www.aln.org. • Kubala, T. (1998). Addressing student needs: teaching on the internet. T.H.E. Journal, March. • Lake, D. (1999). Reducing isolation for distance students: an on-line initiative. Open Learning, 14(3), 14-23.

  22. Reference List con’t • Paloff, R. M. and Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: effective strategies for the online classroom. Jossey Bass: San Francisco. • Vrasidas, C., & McIssac, M.S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22-36.

More Related