1 / 13

The EECCA Strategy Progress Assessment report Roberto Martín-Hurtado EAP Task Force Secretariat

The EECCA Strategy Progress Assessment report Roberto Martín-Hurtado EAP Task Force Secretariat. Background. Kiev 2003 EECCA Environment Strategy Mandate: EAP Task Force to monitor implementation on the basis of information provided by EECCA countries Tbilisi 2004 Stocktaking report

trynt
Download Presentation

The EECCA Strategy Progress Assessment report Roberto Martín-Hurtado EAP Task Force Secretariat

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The EECCA Strategy Progress Assessment report Roberto Martín-Hurtado EAP Task Force Secretariat

  2. Background • Kiev 2003 EECCA Environment Strategy Mandate: EAP Task Force to monitor implementation on the basis of information provided by EECCA countries • Tbilisi 2004 Stocktaking report Review of “baseline conditions” Structured around the Strategy objectives On the basis of available information (databases, Kiev-related reports,…) “Indicators” covering DPSIR, but greater emphasis on responses • Belgrade 2007 Progress Assessment report

  3. Value added • Focus on policy responses (actions) -- complementing EEA’s Belgrade Assessment • Track “planned actions” specified in EECCA Strategy • Showcase examples of successful responses • Integrate ecosystem approach • Expand use of response indicators and other analytical tools How to make this report useful for EECCA countries?

  4. Overarching policy messages for Belgrade Products OECD-led EECCA Strategy Progress Report – Progress in the outputs of the EECCA Environment Strategy and related policies (policy responses / actions) Inputs / half products Experience from new EPRs (UNECE) Policy analysis / response indicators based on inputs from FOs/COs (WB, UNECE, UNEP, RECs,…) EECCA countries self-assessment based on agreed methodology Targeted analysis of particular economic sectors / environmental issues Information and knowledge base (system) EPR Reports FOs/COs Policy Assessment Notes (tbd) Country Self-Assessment Notes (tbd) Consultant reports (tbd) Overall framework

  5. Contents (very first draft!) Ch.1 The Need for Action (Env&Dev, SoE) Ch.2 Constraints to Taking Action Financial resources and institutions(Obj: 1, 5, 6.1) Ch.3 Actions since Kiev Sub-sections dealing with the five policy areas: UAP, WSS, Waste-Chemicals, IWRM, Biodiversity (Obj: 2, 3, 7) Ch.4 Responding Better(Obj: 1, 4, 5, 6.2, 6.3) Optimising the traditional toolkit Investments. Regulation. Economic instruments. (Obj. 1, 5) Expanding the toolkit Integration in sectoral policies. Engaging the Public. (Obj. 4, 6.2, 6.3) Ch.5 Moving Forward Annex A.Country profiles

  6. Analytical tools

  7. Analytical tools

  8. Analytical tools

  9. Analytical tools

  10. Process • Engaging EECCA countries and stakeholders • Design of project (sub-regional workshops) • Information provision • Review of inputs/outputs • Establishing a collaborative framework • Inter-agency report (unlike Stocktaking Report) • Using existing processes (UNECE EPRs, REPIN Meeting, WHO Water and Health protocol) • Delivering dedicated inputs (WB Agriculture and Forestry, WHO air pollution, RECs case studies, UNEP Biodiversity,…) • Need to agree on work plan (responsibilities, deliverables, timeline) • Undertaking analytical work • Developing analytical framework • Developing methodologies for self-assessment • Analysing information from existing processes / dedicated inputs

  11. Timetable • Concept development • Brainstorming February 2005 • Review analytical approaches March-May 2005 • EECCA consultations May-June 2005 • Experts consultations June-October 2005 • Meeting FOs/COs September 2005 • Information collection • Support to EECCA countries Oct 2005-June 2006 • Outlines of dedicated inputs February 2006 • Dedicated inputs June 2006 • AnalysisApril-Sept 2006 • Writing and reviewOct 2006-March 2007 • Production, launch, disseminationApril-Dec 2007

  12. The potential role of the WGEMA and its members • EEA Belgrade Assessment • sharing data on decoupling indicators, other indicators of common interest • As a group • Contribute input on Obj 6.1 Information Management (timing is important!) • Individual EECCA members • Help to select and feed response indicators • Dissemination of report • Any other?

  13. Thanks!

More Related