1 / 5

Comparative Intergovernmental Politics: CETA Negotiations between Canada and the EU

Comparative Intergovernmental Politics: CETA Negotiations between Canada and the EU. CETA Conference: Session 1, May 5, 2014 Dr. Valerie D’Erman University of Victoria (Victoria, BC, Canada). Introduction and background. Canada and EU prevalent examples of federal-like governance

truly
Download Presentation

Comparative Intergovernmental Politics: CETA Negotiations between Canada and the EU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparative Intergovernmental Politics: CETA Negotiations between Canada and the EU CETA Conference: Session 1, May 5, 2014 Dr. Valerie D’Erman University of Victoria (Victoria, BC, Canada)

  2. Introduction and background • Canada and EU prevalent examples of federal-like governance • Early attempts at CETA stalled due to WTO talks and lack of provincial involvement • Significant of this FTA agreement: • Leverage helped EU assert norms of procedure • Precedent for provincial “pre-commitment” • International recognition of EU principle of ‘subsidiarity’

  3. Negotiations • New precedent in Canada for involvement of sub-national governments • One-sided debate over liberalization of services and public procurement • Sectoral protest within Canadian provinces • Criticism over lack of transparency

  4. Significance • Success of EU in getting demands met and in exporting norms of procedure • Possible precedent for EU-U.S. negotiations (TTIP)? • Theoretical understandings of federalism • Contrast between Canada and EU as federal-like polities • Lack of nation-state or elected executive in EU • Internal market coherence much stronger in EU, and resulting ability to negotiate

  5. Conclusions • PARADOX • EU Single Market and federalism • Visible and central goal of European integration • Prior deregulation among member states already achieved through intergovernmental negotiation • Treaty-based governance over constitutionalism • Activist role of the ECJ • EU intergovernmental-supranational relations as a successful model of federal governance rather than a federation with qualifiers

More Related