1 / 17

Keith Clouse Cecilia Morgan Alyson Brown Karen Willcutts

Maximizing Arbitration Efficiency and Effectiveness: Don’t Treat Your Arbitration Like the Courtroom. Keith Clouse Cecilia Morgan Alyson Brown Karen Willcutts Dallas Bar Association Labor & Employment Section October 17, 2011. Panelists. Keith Clouse, Clouse Dunn LLP

trent
Download Presentation

Keith Clouse Cecilia Morgan Alyson Brown Karen Willcutts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maximizing Arbitration Efficiencyand Effectiveness: Don’t TreatYour Arbitration Like the Courtroom Keith Clouse Cecilia Morgan Alyson Brown Karen Willcutts Dallas Bar Association Labor & Employment Section October 17, 2011

  2. Panelists • Keith Clouse, Clouse Dunn LLP AAA Arbitrator/Mediator • Alyson Brown, Clouse Dunn LLP AAA Arbitrator/Mediator • Cecilia Morgan, JAMS Arbitrator/Mediator • Karen Willcutts, JAMS Arbitrator/Mediator Dallas County Civil Associate Judge, 2002-2004

  3. From Mike Lynch Cartoons; originally appeared in Reader’s Digest.

  4. Managing Costs • Parties Can Select Strategies to Impact Costs at Every Stage of Arbitration: • Arbitrator Selection • Management Conference • Discovery • Motion Practice • Briefing • Award

  5. Arbitration Overview • Arbitration boundaries: • The parties’ arbitration agreement • Applicable statutes: • Federal Arbitration Act (9 USC §§1-16) • Texas Arbitration Act (TCPRC Chapter 171) • Admin. agency rules & procedures (e.g. AAA/JAMS) • The arbitrator’s authority derives primarily from the contractual agreement of the parties—draft wisely! • Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, 339 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. 2011)

  6. Arbitration vs. Litigation • Major differences between arbitration & traditional judicial litigation: • Faster (usually—ideally!) • Somewhat less formal • No juries • Limited discovery (or sometimes no discovery) • Rules of evidence inapplicable • Fewer procedural requirements • Very broad arbitrator discretion • Variable form of award, usually at litigants’ option • Very limited grounds for appeal on substantive grounds

  7. Arbitrator Selection • Arbitrator selection / appointment process: • Party appointed panels • Appointment from list(s) • Party agreement • $$$ Single Arbitrator vs. 3-Person Panel • Arbitrator disclosure requirements • ASAP - Provide list of parties, counsel, related entities, interested persons, likely witnesses • Ongoing supplementation & disclosure obligation – Parties and arbitrator • Parties’ failure to provide information can result in delays, reappointment

  8. Management Conference • Parties can design arbitration to save costs while achieving fully developed case • Involve corporate representatives/in-house counsel • Scheduling Order • Discovery - $$$ Limit Depositions • Motions - $$$ Motion Practice limits • Document Exchange $$$ Informal, voluntary • Joint Exhibit Lists • Form of Award $$$ don’t require findings of fact/conclusions of law

  9. Discovery • Don’t treat arbitration like traditional litigation • Informal, voluntary disclosures and document exchange • Limit number of requests, interrogatories • Depositions – limit number, duration • Shorten response deadlines • Electronic discovery • Address discovery disputes quickly

  10. Motion Practice • Dispositive motions– use sparingly • Clear questions of law (e.g., statute of limitations) • Possible grounds to overturn award under FAA – failure to consider all relevant evidence • Significantly increases arbitrator’s study time – and parties’ $$$

  11. Briefing • Address key points only—avoid “kitchen sink briefs” • If you’ve briefed it once, resist the temptation to brief it again • Attach key cases – highlighted • Replies, surreplies – enough is enough • Shorter is better—the more you write, the more it costs

  12. Award • Form of award: simple, reasoned, detailed • Findings of Fact/Conclusions • Assist the arbitrator: • timeline • cast of characters • key documents • concise statement of claims and relief requested

  13. Ethical Challenges • Pro se claimants • Spoliation • Civility/Professionalism • Informal doesn’t mean ex parte • Conflicts – multiple party representation

  14. If I Could Tell Parties to Do orDon’t Do One Thing in Arbitration …. • Avoid Repetition – cumulative witnesses, documents, multiple briefs • Be Civil • Organize Exhibits – key docs, avoid duplicates • Provide Marked Deposition Excerpts – not the full deposition • Tell the arbitrator clearly what you’re asking for

  15. Trends/Legislative Activity • Pending legislation—Arbitration Fairness Act reintroduced May 2011 (Sen. Franken) • Attacks on arbitration—still out there • Legislative Education – slowly working • Criticism of Arbitration – cost, time. It’s in the parties’ control!

  16. “In fighting over the little problems, we often lose sight of the big ones!” --Danny Patel Published in Dispute Resolution Magazine, Summer 2010, by the American Bar Association.

More Related