Using Motivation 3.0 with Community Development Workers

1. Using Motivation 3.0 with Community Development Workers Tom Davis, MPH Senior Specialist for Social & Beh. Change (TOPS Project) & Senior Director of Program Quality Improvement (FH)

2. Under what conditions do performance-based incentives work and not work? And what are the dangers of using them indiscriminately? When should we pay CDWs and when should we use volunteer CDWs? Some Questions We will Explore

3. To what degree do you think it’s important or necessary that we use mostly monetary or in-kind incentives to get community-level workers (e.g., CHWs, Ag Extensionists) to get things done in our food security programs? (1=Strongly Disagree; 10 = Strongly Agree) To what degree do you think you have the knowledge and skills needed to motivate community-level volunteers to get things done in our food security programs? (1=Strongly Disagree; 10 = Strongly Agree) Ruler Exercise

4. Kinshasha (amateur, volunteer) Symphony Orchestra: On YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vTk0XsgZV4

5. Published 2009 by Dan Pink “…a paradigm-shattering look at what truly motivates us and how we can use that knowledge to work smarter and live better” Lessons learned for motivating CDWs?? Drive

6. Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us Click here to view DRIVE video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc (16 mins at 70%)

7. “Two-minute buzz”: What are the most significant lessons learned and implications for our food security work – if any – from the second video (Dan Pink’s Drive)? How might we do things differently if we took into account these new findings? Small Group Discussion

8. Biological: Hunger, thirst and copulation (Motivation 1.0) Extrinsic reward: Reward and punishment delivered by the environment for behaving in certain ways (Motivation 2.0) Intrinsic reward: The joy/satisfaction of completing a task motivates its completion. (Motivation 3.0) Three Basic Human Drives “Satisfaction lies in the effort, not in the attainment; full effort is full victory.” -- Gandhi

9. Motivation 2.0 (think performance-based incentives): Good for unrelenting, routine, mechanical, or boring tasks. Not as useful when creativity, maximization of performance, quality and commitment are desired. “Once the task called for even rudimentary cognitive skill, a larger reward led to poorer performance.” Study cited by Edward Deci (replicated) shows tendency starts young: Children allowed to draw for fun with special markers. Later, some given “good player” awards for their drawing. Later, when asked to draw again, children given awards were less likely to draw, or drew worse. It behooves us to tap into intrinsic motivations … both for paid CDWs and unpaid volunteer CDWs. Motivation 2.0 … not so useful for improving performance

10. What are some of the problems with using “carrot and stick” approaches to motivation? They can extinguish intrinsic motivation. They can diminish performance. They can crush creativity. Problems with Motivation 2.0 (Carrots and Sticks)

13. They can crowd out good behavior. They can encourage cheating, shortcuts, and unethical behavior. They can become addictive. They can foster short-term thinking. Problems with Motivation 2.0 (Carrots and Sticks)

14. Motivation 2.0 (performance-based incentives) is useful for: When Carrots are Sticks are Useful • Tasks that are inherently unpleasant (e.g., cleaning out latrines). • Tasks that only require mechanical skills. • We need to pay people a baseline wage (but not performance incentives, generally) when a volunteer cannot be expected to do the job. • For CDWs, need to also provide basic training, supplies, consumables and supervision

15. Motivation 3.0 relies on: Giving people (e.g., CDWs) a certain level ofAutonomy … of task (what they do), time (when they do it), team (who they do it with) and technique (how they do it). Helping people to achieve Mastery. Helping people to discover Purpose in what they do. Motivation 3.0

16. Pareek’s Motivation Model

17. Please answer the following questions in four small groups (15 minutes): Group 1/3: How does your organization provoke feelings in CDWs that lead to better retention and performance (i.e., mastery/achievement, autonomy, purpose, affiliation, extension, influence, control, and growth)? Group 2/4: How do you decide whether a particular food security task should be done by a volunteer or a paid worker? What criteria do you use (or should we use) for deciding? (for example: time – hours/week required? Complexity – can be done by person with primary school education?) ALL GROUPS: What is the way forward? How can the FSN Network make it easier for FS implementers to use motivation 3.0 – Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose and the six other motivators – to make our workers and volunteers more effective and satisfied? Report out (20 minutes) Small Group Discussion

18. Volunteers can be counted on to do many things that CDWs do if: the work load is kept light (e.g., < 8 hours/week), basic skills are needed, and those skills can be imparted slowly; and there is a focus on intrinsic rewards such as giving volunteers more autonomy, providing pathways to skills/mastery in what they do, and helping them to discover the purpose associated with their work (e.g., measuring decreases in child deaths). Using Motivation 3.0 with CDWs Do something for somebody every day for which you do not get paid. -- Albert Schweitzer

19. CHPs in Ethiopia: Act as role models; promote small doable actions at home to improve the health of children and family using action-based health messages with neighbors; Increase community use of health services; leverage and support HEWs Non-financial incentives used to motivate CHPs include: 1. Support by community authorities [respect] 2. Photo identification badges [affiliation] 3. Monthly review meetings, refresher trainings, and mentoring visits with HEW [mastery/growth] 4. Community Festivals [affiliation / influence / respect] Support by community authorities includes: Formally introduce volunteers to the community and explain their role Encourage the community to implement the volunteers’ advice Recognize volunteers’ contribution during official gatherings and invite them to speak. Found that Volunteers are motivated when their families, communities, and personal status benefit. One Example: Motivation of CDWs in Ethiopia (Thanks to Mary Carnell [Director, Center for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health JSI] for this information.)

20. Time Contribution (in hours) of Volunteers and Other Project Staff (FH/Mozambique CG Project) October 2005 – September 2010 Community driven … Promoters (CHWs) Volunteers 84% of the work was done by Care Group Volunteers, and 98% by community members (CGVs + paid local CHWs). Total value of volunteer time (@$2.98/8hrs) = $904,811

21. Yes! … required if you want CHW commitment, creativity, and ownership. Go beyond a wage. Help paid CDWs to: Do we need Motivation 3.0 for paid CDWs? • Have some autonomy(task, time, team, technique), • Achieve mastery, • Discover purpose in what they do, and • Have feelings of achievement, affiliation, extension, influence, control, and growth

22. This is the true joy in life, the being used for a purpose recognized by yourself as a mighty one; the being a force of nature instead of a feverish selfish clod of ailments and grievances complaining that the world will not devote itself to making you happy. I am of the opinion that my life belongs to the whole community and as long as I live it is my privilege to do for it whatever I can. I want to be thoroughly used up when I die, for the harder I work, the more I live. I rejoice in life for its own sake. Life is no ‘brief candle’ to me. It is sort of a splendid torch which I have a hold of for the moment, and I want to make it burn as brightly as possible before handing it over to future generations. -- George Bernard Shaw Finding One’s Purpose

23. This presentation was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Food for the Hungry and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.