1 / 19

Academic Integrity

Academic Integrity. Online Assessment/Plagiarism. Communication Synchronous (can be recorded) Asynchronous Email Discussion Boards Blogs Wikis. Advantages of Asynchronous discussions .

tori
Download Presentation

Academic Integrity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Academic Integrity Online Assessment/Plagiarism

  2. Communication • Synchronous (can be recorded) • Asynchronous • Email • Discussion Boards • Blogs • Wikis

  3. Advantages of Asynchronous discussions • Allow students time for deeper thought and refection –Driscoll (1998) suggests that asynchronous methods provide a more flexible timeframe for students to reflect on what they have learned as compared to synchronous delivery formats. • In a F2F class keeps the discussion going between class or when class is too short.

  4. Discussion Board – Best Practices • Fostering discussions • Promoting Higher Order Thinking • Creating Community and Collaboration • Assessment

  5. Fostering the discussion • Frame the topic – Divide large topics into logical subtopics (Ko & Rossen(2001) • Asking open-ended questions and encouraging students to reply with more personal thought to ensure that the email dialogue is interactive rather than just a one-way instruction (Chang, 2009). • Professor - Establish a pattern of frequent response- several short bursts per week instead of one long session(Ko & Rossen(2001)

  6. Encouragement and support • Facilitate student participation – get them talking to each other – respond to group themes not individuals(Ko & Rossen(2001) • Responsibility online instructor to nudge and encourage the construction knowledge (just like in a face to face classroom). (Christopher, Thomas & Tallent-Rennels, 2004). • Consider a “quiet time” when other time intensive activities are occurring in the class (Ko & Rossen(2001)

  7. Be aware of cultural patterns(Ko & Rossen(2001) • Make it clear if participation is mandatory Don’t force personal experiences try “Can you relate to this to your own experiences or one you have heard or read about?”

  8. Individual Personalities • Quieter students more likely to participate in online classes than in F2F class – information exchanges more prevelant in asynchronous format by providing opportunities for shy or non-native speakers to express themselves (Delahoussay & Neiheisel, 2005: Funaro & Montell, 1999).

  9. Promoting Higher Order Thinking

  10. Active thinking • Use case studies • Problem solving • Groups/teams

  11. Assessment

  12. Encouraging ParticipationCawthon, & Harris (2008) • Provide students with expectations for participation • Time commitments required for participation • Communication with peers mandatory • Frequent grading of discussions even if pass/fail.

  13. Creating Community and Collaboration Reduce the feeling of isolation that came come with distance education. If web-based courses provide learners with effective interaction, then they possess all the benefits that a course could possibly have – flexibility convenience, and quality (Chang, 2009)

  14. Strategies and techniques for community building in on-line environments (Hill, Han, & Raven, 2001).

  15. Instructor and Learner Strategies for community building in online environments (Hill, Han, & Raven, 2001).

  16. Review Our

  17. Questions

More Related