Cs 575 spring 2010 class meeting 3
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 63

CS 575 Spring 2010 Class Meeting 3 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 42 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

CS 575 Spring 2010 Class Meeting 3. Bapa Rao. Outline. administrative Review of previous week Douglas Engelbart’s demo Student Presentations Agenda for next week. Administrative. Comments / questions. Review of previous meeting. Berners-Lee videos “semantic web” Data, data, data

Download Presentation

CS 575 Spring 2010 Class Meeting 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Cs 575 spring 2010 class meeting 3

CS 575 Spring 2010Class Meeting 3

Bapa Rao


Outline

Outline

  • administrative

  • Review of previous week

  • Douglas Engelbart’s demo

  • Student Presentations

  • Agenda for next week


Administrative

Administrative

  • Comments / questions


Review of previous meeting

Review of previous meeting

  • Berners-Lee videos

  • “semantic web”

  • Data, data, data

  • Links between Data

  • Web R & D as a collective social-scientific process

  • Web science


More berners lee

More Berners-Lee

  • Social / human aspect of R&D cycle

  • Macroscopic human effects

  • Scientific analysis phase

  • Emergence or “magic”

  • Process of web science

  • Email webgoogleweb 2.0semantic web

  • Technical aspects of semantic web

  • Conceptual aspects

  • Pragmatic aspects

  • Challenges of web science


Engelbart mother of all demos

Engelbart “mother of all demos”


Engelbart and augmenting the human intellect

Engelbart and “augmenting the human intellect”


Engelbart paper overview

Engelbart Paper Overview

  • Capability to obtain better solutions to complex problems

  • Benefit ‘information workers’

  • New conceptual framework

  • What to augment

    • Artifacts, language, methodology, training

    • Whorf’s hypothesis & the weighted pencil expt

    • Problem-solving process

    • Structure: bureaucratic to more distributed

    • Executive capability—choosing from repertoire

  • What is the impact of augmentation?


Engelbart two domain system

Engelbart: Two-domain system

  • H-LAM/T


Last week s presentations

Last week’s presentations

  • Cloud computing—Tam Nguyen

  • Human interaction in Internet communities—Jerry Chang

  • HCC and HCM—Ashok Sahu

  • Artificial Life—Saeid Mousavi


Engelbart contd

Engelbart (contd)

  • Capability repertoire hierarchy

    • Basic capabilities (human and artifact) are the raw materials

    • Mental structuring (cognitive structures)

      • Development Models: garden, basketball team, machine building

    • Concept structuring

    • Symbol structuring

    • Process structuring

      • ‘M’ in H-LAM/T

    • Physical structuring

      • A in H-LAM/T

    • Interdependence among all these structures


Engelbart contd1

Engelbart (contd)

  • Concept structuring

    • concepts are tools

    • concepts have handles--representations

    • concept structures map to mental structures

    • some concept structures are better than others

    • language (natural lang esp) is the grand concept structuring tool


Engelbart contd2

Engelbart (contd)

  • Symbol structuring

    • some symbols work better than others

      • depends on the purpose

    • need flexibility, translatability

    • view generation capability (rather than physical linear ordering)


Engelbart contd3

Engelbart (contd)

  • Interdependence among hierarchies

    • Cyclic

    • Regenerative

      • Improvement in one category feeds improvement in other categories


Augmenting the human intellect

Augmenting the Human Intellect

  • 1962 report/proposal to Air Force Ofc. Of Scientific Research

  • Capability to obtain better solutions to complex problems

  • New conceptual framework

    • Not small tricks

  • Example scenario: an architect’s workday

    • Design alternatives

    • Operational environments

    • Functional specifications

    • Detailed design

    • Tools

      • Synthesis, analysis, verification, debugging


Engelbart contd4

Engelbart (contd)

  • Who will benefit

    • Every person who does his thinking with symbolized concepts

      • Human language, pictographs, formal logic, mathematics, …

    • Architects, engineers, lawyers, writers, …

    • ‘information workers’


Engelbart contd5

Engelbart (contd)

  • Conceptual framework is needed to know

    • What to augment

      • artifacts

      • language

      • methodology

      • Training

    • Goal: problem solving process

      • Process is what we actually do, and are trying to do more effectively

    • Structure or organization across the board

      • Little steps, organized as a process hierarchy

        • Versus objects?

      • Process repertoire or toolkit

      • Basic capabilities (‘hardware’) to higher-level capabilities

        • Synergy, emergent capabilities, …

      • Which subprocess to choose?

        • Executive Capability: planning, selecting, and supervising

    • Augmentation impact

      • Suppose you had a better writing tool…

        • Hardware, software, dictionary, spell checker, fact researcher, …

        • Pencil to word processor

          • Benefits?

          • Break down old process, come up with new process

          • New capabilities!


Engelbart two domain system1

Engelbart: Two-domain system

  • H-LAM/T


Engelbart contd6

Engelbart (contd)

  • How did humans get ‘augmented’ during our development?

    • 1. concept manipulation

    • 2. symbol manipulation

    • 3. Manual, External, Symbol Manipulation

  • Whorf’s hypothesis: Language affects our thinking and capabilities

    • 4. Automated external symbol manipulation (neo-whorfian: technology affects language and capabilities)

      • Language can also evolve to meet conceptual and task needs (counterargument to whorfian hypothesis)


Engelbart contd7

Engelbart (contd)

  • Brick-pencil experiment


Engelbart contd8

Engelbart (contd)

  • Brick-pencil expt (de-augmentation)

    • Typewriter: 7 sec

    • Pencil: 20 secs

    • Brick, small letters: 65+ secs

    • Brick, large letters: 42 secs

  • Impacts on effectiveness of culture

    • Too hard too few people doing it

    • Different concepts for work, record-keeping, etc.

  • What about known impacts of actual augmentation, 46 years after Engelbart wrote this proposal?


Engelbart contd9

Engelbart (contd)

  • Capability repertoire hierarchy

    • Basic capabilities (human and artifact) are the raw materials

    • Mental structuring (cognitive structures)

      • Development Models: garden, basketball team, machine building

    • Concept structuring

    • Symbol structuring

    • Process structuring

      • ‘M’ in H-LAM/T

    • Physical structuring

      • A in H-LAM/T

    • Interdependence among all these structures


Engelbart contd10

Engelbart (contd)

  • Concept structuring

    • concepts are tools

    • concepts have handles--representations

    • concept structures map to mental structures

    • some concept structures are better than others

    • language (natural lang esp) is the grand concept structuring tool


Engelbart contd11

Engelbart (contd)

  • Symbol structuring

    • some symbols work better than others

      • depends on the purpose

    • need flexibility, translatability

    • view generation capability (rather than physical linear ordering)


Engelbart contd12

Engelbart (contd)

  • Interdependence among hierarchies

    • Cyclic

    • Regenerative

      • Improvement in one category feeds improvement in other categories


Engelbart contd13

Engelbart (contd)

  • Roles and levels

    • executive

    • direct-contributive

  • model of executive superstructure

    • Bureaucratic hierarchy is onerous

    • contractor-subcontractor model

  • Flexibility in the Executive Role

    • executive tasks are complex

    • orderly flexibility requirement on symbol etc. structures is costly

    • disorderly process of change must be supported

      • ‘agile methodologies’


Berners lee s view in context

Berners-Lee’s view in context

  • Social = Human

  • Concept augmentation is an emergent phenomenon


Student presentations

Student Presentations

  • Jigar Patel: programming paradigms

  • ManthanKatharotiya: Web mining


Reminder a flexible structure for our study

REMINDER: A [flexible] structure for our study

  • ‘Human issues’ is all-encompassing

  • Many interlocking dimensions

  • Human roles vis-à-vis the computer

    • User

    • Inventor / researcher

    • Visionary

    • Content creator

    • Hacker

    • Criminal

    • Business person

    • Wealth generator

  • Human-computer coupling

    • Symbiosis, tool, …


A flexible structure for our study contd

A [flexible] structure for our study (contd)

  • Domains of human activity

    • Education, Entertainment, Play, Family, Reproduction, Art ,Wealth generation, Government, consumption, religion, philosophy, …

  • Values

    • Many values depend on role, domain, …

    • Absolute values?

    • Creativity, aesthetics, access, opportunity, freedom, spirituality, rationality, peace, brotherhood, prosperity, …

  • Vision, potentials, realities

    • Babbage’s Analytical Engine, Bush’s Memex, …

  • Pragmatics

    • Is it possible? How to get there?

    • Techniques, Design, Technology,

  • Scaling and emergent phenomena

    • Will a whole new thing emerge if huge numbers of humans interact with computers in a certain way? How do we understand that ‘thing’?

  • Other aspects, dimensions?


A flexible structure for our study contd1

A [flexible] structure for our study (contd)

  • Use readings and videos of pioneering thinkers and inventors to elicit a concrete jumping-off point for discussion and analysis

  • Use presentations and discussions to ‘tag’ current thoughts, activities, developments, .. along these dimensions

  • Preparation

    • Review Resources and Additional Resources

    • Research and read pioneering articles (like the Memex article, Berners-lee’s articles

  • What should emerge at the end?

    • Open

    • Predictions, critiques, lessons, techniques, new visions, new ideas, stimuli to thought, …


Summary

Summary

  • Berners-lee’s push for a collectivized, participatory semantic web science

  • Engelbart’s early technical achievements laid the foundation

  • Engelbart laid a rigorous conceptual foundation that might be called the architecture of man-machine symbiosis

  • We will discuss more about man/machine symbiosis according to Licklider

  • Where do today’s presentations fit in?


Agenda for next week

Agenda for next week

  • Yuri Muradiyan: Human Enhancement Ethics

  • GaurangJadia: Crowdsourcing

  • Abhishek Sharma: Security, privacy, crime

  • ArmenGalstyan: Entertainment / gaming


  • Login