1 / 9

Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT):

Drive Beam BPMs. Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba, Alexander Gerbershagen, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry, Jack Roberts John Adams Institute Oxford University. Opportunity.

thor-blake
Download Presentation

Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT):

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Drive Beam BPMs Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba, Alexander Gerbershagen, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry, Jack Roberts John Adams Institute Oxford University

  2. Opportunity • Need for cost-effective design for tens of thousands of drive beam BPMs • Strong UK expertise on cavity (RHUL) and stripline (Oxford) BPMs • Working systems (at ATF2) with excellent performance

  3. Opportunity • Need for cost-effective design for tens of thousands of drive beam BPMs • Strong UK expertise on cavity (RHUL) and stripline (Oxford) BPMs • Working systems (at ATF2) with excellent performance • ATF2 stripline BPMs • single-pass beam • bunch Q ~ 1 nC 330 nm rms

  4. Opportunity • Need for cost-effective design for tens of thousands of drive beam BPMs • Strong UK expertise on cavity (RHUL) and stripline (Oxford) BPMs • Working systems (at ATF2) with excellent performance • Thibaut+ Manfred strongly supportive: • new student working on: • design of cost-effective BPM based on existing experience, exploring reasonable possibilities (striplines, buttons, coaxial … )

  5. Future work proposal • Study of low cost BPM pickup alternatives. • Study of the PETS RF power EMI at the pickup location • Theoretical (EM simulations) and practical (CLEX beam) • Compare different BPM types, including costs and performance • Stripline, button, coaxial and other “exotic” designs • Evaluate read-out electronics for a cost/performance optimized DB BPM pickup. • Design, prototype, and install a prototype DB BPM system in CLEX • Perform beam studies and demonstrate to meet the required performance, e.g. 2 μm resolution.

  6. Old example (NLCTA)

  7. FONT2 beamline installation at SLAC NLCTA(65 MeV 170ns-long train @ 87ns spacing) Dipole and kickers New BPMs

  8. Future proposed resources • Full-time PhD student (Oxford) • Supported by Oxford and RHUL: • Perry, Lyapin (electronic engineers) • Burrows, Christian, Boogert (faculty)

  9. Deliverables and milestones • 2014 • Revisit the goals of the Drive Beam BPM R&D • Investigation of various BPM pickup types, based on simulations. • 2015 • Present an optimized DB BPM pickup design, including critical parts of the signal processing, i.e. rejection of unwanted 12 GHz RF power. • 2016 • DB BPM prototyping for CLEX • Stretched wire and RF bench tests of the BPM pickup • Read-out electronics prototyping • First beam studies at CLEX • 2017 • Finalizing beam studies at CLEX • Summary report on the Drive Beam BPM R&D

More Related