1 / 51

FYC Assessment & Retention Remixed

FYC Assessment & Retention Remixed. Inviting students into education through writing. "I only cared about writing a good paper":  Expectation hell-bent on collision. Ron Christiansen. The pleasure of student voice in creating a community space. Brittany Stephenson.

thanos
Download Presentation

FYC Assessment & Retention Remixed

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FYC Assessment & Retention Remixed Inviting students into education through writing

  2. "I only cared about writing a good paper":  Expectation hell-bent on collision Ron Christiansen

  3. The pleasure of student voice in creating a community space Brittany Stephenson

  4. Trickster Crossroads:  The WC as research collaborator Clint Gardner

  5. Retention and Writing Instruction: Pegeen Powell's recent CCCs article "I argue that composition faculty are especially well positioned to participate in the conversations about retention. The unique context of the writing classroom as the interface between students' past and future educational experiences, as the introduction to the discourse practices of higher education, and as one of the only universal requirements at most institutions makes a prime site for retention efforts" (Powell 669).

  6. Listening to student voices The point is not to reduce the complexities of writing to a sorting out of personal influences and politics, but to suggest that writers deal not only with codes but with people, not only with genres but situations. The culture does speak to us, and perhaps even through us, but its discourses and commonplaces are heard through and inflected by the voices of individuals. This argues for the power of inviting students of writing to see themselves not simply as taking on a set of discursive strategies or conventions, as entering into a kind of abstract discourse, but also as responding to what other real people—writers, teachers, classmates—have had to say to them, as building on the projects of some individuals and arguing against those of others. At the same time, it still seems to me crucial that we recognize certain ways of speaking which cannot be located in individuals, but belong, as it were, to the culture as a whole or to certain discourses within it: what a student or teacher can say, what a man or a woman can say, what a literary critic or a composition theorist can say. All these and many more roles are determined by habits, traditions, and expectations that go well beyond the power of any individual to change or transform. It is for me precisely in that tension—between the voice of an individual and the demands of the discourse of which she is a part—that much of the interest of teaching writing lies.  (Harris, "A Teaching Subject")

  7. Unpredictable path of writing assessment Nancy Sommers, in her groundbreaking longitudinal work with undergraduate writers, insists that “to reduce four years of college to a series of outcomes…is to find ourselves, in the current culture of assessment, to be asked to measure something that we do not know how to interpret. We might be able to count the grammatical and stylistic errors students make when they arrange their alphabets, but we have not determined how to measure the unpredictable and uneven path of writing development.”

  8. Overview of the studies: Painting the Picture of the Community College Student • 2007 Assessment • Student Retention and Success: An Ethnographic Study of English 1010 (2007-2008) • First-Year Composition Assessment and Retention Remixed: Inviting Students into Education through Writing (2009-2010)  Bookends of assessment Student Writing Center actions • Podcasts introducing writing courses • Specific outreach to composition students

  9. At a Glance: Student Survey ¨52% of students were first year students ¨17% of students have been at SLCC 5 or more semesters ¨60% of students graduated from high school in 2004 or earlier ¨18% of students graduated from high school in 2007 ¨55% of students work 31 or more hours per week ¨29% of students work between 11 and 30 hours per week ¨58.7% of students were part-time students ¨41.3% of students were full-time students ¨35% of students spent 3 or fewer hours per week doing homework for English 1010 ¨52% of students spent between 4 and 6 hours per week doing homework   ¨7% of students visited the Student Writing Center

  10. At a Glance: By the numbers 1893 students were enrolled in English 1010 in spring 2008 19.6% of students received D's E’s 7.8% of students withdrew In other words 27.7% of students (approximately 525) did not successfully complete English

  11. Students Instructors 9-10 9-10 30.5% 0% 7-8 7-8 19% 42.7% 6 6 50% 9.7% 5 or below 5 or below 19% 17.1% Misperceptions of Preparedness

  12. The unexpected community college student  Michael and Gabriella who both have parents working at a university and turned down reduced tuition for smaller class sizes at the community college Older student as outsider  Rex: Younger student have so much energy, happy to see their friends. I don't have energy. I’m not excited…coimpletely opposite. I don’t have the common interest. I do not  have the friend base. Shauri: When I hear the word community I don't even think of school. I think of my neighborhood, my house. Over-qualified yet nervous Shauri: overseas experience, life-long learner, wants to write children's books--yet indicated a "9" for fear on both scales. Illiterate father. The Consumer or Seeking a one night stand Jon: I don’t’ want to. I’m not involved. I don’t want to be involved with SLCC.  I don’t care, many student don’t care about the Bruin Bytes, a basketball game because it is a community college.  Jon: professors should recruit me to these clubs Never been educated Nina: I was raised overseas in a cult; didn’t go to high school. Then I left the cult. So I hadn’t been in schools...Got married. Moved around in the military. Then my grandparents decided it was time to do something. Jeff: I didn't really go to high school and part of me is glad because I didn't want to be indoctrinated. (a summary as I can't find where he talks about this) Student profiles

  13. Naively innocent Nina: I didn’t know anything. I showed up here on the first day of classes. Then they were like "you have to actually register for classes" so I went back home.  Nina: they passed out a syllabus and I was like what in the hell is that. I needed someone to walk me through it.  Religiously Conservative & Politically Affronted  Jon: We are told to think the opposite of what we are taught [at home]. I get annoyed with that. People say that’s too conservative to think like that, [that we are] supposed to be more open ended, they believe everything in science. Global warming. I don’t want to write on that. Some teachers want to slap me across the face. But I’m sorry I believe it’s a hoax.  Jon: I found that I was a little more on the conservative background. I’m a Christian.  Many teachers seem to have the more liberal, the more scientific view. I'm not saying it’s wrong in any shape or form...Felt like I was in a battle at times. Reluctant graduate or the careerist Nina: I just took a bunch of diversity courses because I didn't want to do the testing Jeff: has made a career out of the CC--starting clubs, approaching school paper to write a series, several certificates It's for ME Shauri (interview): I’m at a point in my life where it would have been nice to please my parents because none of them went to college, but that’s not the issue anymore. I have nothing to prove. It’s for me.  Amateur Writers Jon: lots of writing on conservative blogs, FB Jeff: satire, ideas for writing projects like the info gap articles about SLCC Student profiles

  14. 20 something with experience Nate: I have ambition. I'm tired of my job and working where I am. It's a great motivation to get through school.  Tim: I used to write to my own audience. It makes you feel good to be validated. Now I try to write from a different angle. Instead of this is how I grew up and this is what I think. We are think we are right...Most of my family is conservative, I'm conservative. [but] I lived up there [Washington] for awhile. It gave me a new perspective. Really opened my mind. Nate:  My metaphor is climbing a long rope then cutting it to get free. Like a rope attached to a balloon or something. SLCC is like the balloon itself. It's my way out of Utah. Student profiles

  15. CCSSE Demographics • Almost 50% of the undergraduate students in public colleges and universities in the U.S. are now enrolled in community colleges • Typically older than the traditional 18 to 22-year-old college student: the average community college student is 29 • Jobs and families: 31% of survey respondents have children living at home, 57% work more than 20 hours a week. Most are financially independent of their parents • 44% of surveyed students report that lack of finances would be a likely or very likely cause for them to drop out of college

  16. CCSSE:  Varied and multiple goals • 51% of survey respondents indicate that their primary goal is to transfer to a four-year college or university • However, 58% say their primary goal is to obtain an associate degree  • 12% are taking classes at more than one institution simultaneously, and 25% have already earned some kind of postsecondary credential – a vocational certificate or an associate, bachelor's, or graduate degree  • Almost two-thirds (63%) attend college part-time • 31% have children living at home • 57% work more than 20 hours a week • Most are financially independent of their parents • 44% of surveyed students report that lack of finances would be a likely or very likely cause for them to drop out of college

  17. As Tom Fox argues in Defending Access: A critique of standards in higher education, "as writing teachers, we are institutionally positioned to gatekeep, to do harm. To create access we must go against the grain" (qtd in Powell 670). As Jeffrey Klausman, a writing program administrator at Whatcom Community College, says “I like the phrase ‘invited into their education,’ as it is in keeping with both with the community college mission and with my view of the function of the first-year writing courses (gate-openers rather than gate-keepers). But who is it that we are inviting in? And by what means?”  (35) Default Gate-keeping

  18. CCSSE:  Despite the challenges, high degree of satisfaction • Ninety-four percent would recommend their college to a friend or family member • 86% rate their overall educational experience at the college as good or excellent • 70% indicate that their college provides the support they need to succeed at the college either "quite a bit" or "very much." • By contrast only 45% feel that they are able to get the financial support they need to afford their education 

  19. "It is extremely significant that at the very schools where higher education is the most accessible, graduation rates are the most dismal...studies conducted...suggest that tacit, and in some cases, very subtle, exclusionary dynamics are at work inside even the most accessibile colleges." (Cox) "The dangers of using raw retention rates as an indicator of success: retention could then dictate access" (Astin qtd in Powell 672). Through the Front Door

  20. SLCC Student Writing Center • Multi-departmental • Multi-faceted staff • Highly divergent students • Collaborative with student, departmental, and institutional goals.

  21. "Advocates tend to view social constructionism as a liberatory philosophy in emphasizing the decentralization of power within education--moving power away from the control of any one individual--teacher/student/tutor--and giving it to the group." (Murphy) "Fostering writerly identity is not our ultimate goal; it is how those identities participate in a writing center community of practice that is most important....participants in a community of practice must be engaged in activities that are meaningful and must have ways of talking about those experiences, that there must be a way of 'talking about...shared historical and social resources...that can sustain mutual engagement in action,' that participants' competence must be recognized, and that there must be 'a way of talkinga bout how learning changes who we are and creates personal histories of becoming in the context of our communities.'" (Geller et al) WC as community

  22. Foundational assumptions about writing centers

  23. Writing centers as places supportive of curriculum and the institutions Writing centers as radical places that transform curriculum and the institution Essential conflict

  24. A brief history of contentedness "Today institutional identity is a hot topic, as writing centers attempt to situate themselves in relation to the classroom, writing programs, and institutional cultures.  For early centers, this concern was not nearly as pressing, but it begins to surface by the 1940s.  In the 1930s...articles on the Minnesota and Iowa labs seem content to present them as part of the larger writing program and, because they served all students, are not concerned with the stigma of being perceived as remedial facilities.  Their identity, rather, is vested in the difference between classroom and individual instruction."  (Carino)

  25. "What is available to the writing center community is the radical idea (institutionally at least) of acknowledging and articulating the ways that writing center discourse, as pragmatic and as contextually aware as it is, creates knowledge that is valid.  This understanding of knowledge can be used to replace the modernist/disciplinary, theory/practice dyads witha more flexible, pragmatic understanding of contradiction as acceptable and responsible."  (Hobson) "We still pride ourselves on our capacity for providing an alternative to mass education:  to epistemological conformism within disciplines and courses, to teacher (expert) centrality, to assessment by measureable oucomes, to replicable pedagogics, to the thorough fixation on the isolated mind that above all characterizes the modern philosophy of education."  (Riley) The writing center & its discontents

  26. Smashing tradition     "When writing centers work like they're supposed to, they encourage the intellect of the undergraduate writer in ways that either ignore these principles or subvert them:  expertise is less important than personal engagement, for instance; cognitive 'measurements' are usually abandoned entirely.  Because our principles are different, the established university culture has difficulty recognizing what writing centers do.  Thus we are often regarded with suspicion by alert traditionalists and by administrators who are unable to rethink the notion of 'productivity.'" (Riley)

  27. Writing center as (not)home "It is evident in writing center research and lore that having a 'homey' writing center is not unique, nor is it accidental.  Professionals in the field created friendly centers, or what they imagined were friendly centers, for conscious reasons--they did not want to be that other, scary, institutional lab for remedial students, they wanted students to feel welcome, and they felt like one big family.  Writing Centers wanted to assure students that nothing harmful would be done to them upon entering--the centers were less doctor's office or science lab and more like any old living room."  (McKinney)

  28. Displaced classroom practice "Thinking of writing as a social, collaborative act implies some changes in the way we teach and learn writing.  One implied change is that we find ways to put into classroom practice the principle that writing is a displaced form of conversation, and its corollary that learning to write and to make judgments as a writer is a displaced form of conversation about writing....collaborative learning teachers create conditions in which students engage in conversation, both face-to-face conversation and conversation displaced into writing."  (Bruffee, A Short Course in Writing)

  29. Proof is in the Wordle (pudding)

  30. "Trickster at the table" "Historically, the western intellectual tradition teaches us to gravitate toward certainty and to strive for Truth instead of valuing those moments when the foundations of our truths are rocked--those moments when Trickster plays with our sense of perceptions.  The transformative potential of Trickster moment is not purely in Trickster's actions or intentions, however.  Rather, the possibility of learning and of being transformed by such moments lies in what sense we make of that flash of vision the Trickster moment gives us of ourselves, our convictions about who we are, what the world is and how and why it is just that way."  (Geller et al, Everyday Writing Center)

  31. Trickster in the hall • The Writing Center can serve as a collaborative partner in its institutional context and with classroom instruction. • Classroom instruction can be informed by writing center theory and practice, and the writing center can be informed by work in the classroom.   • We learn from conversations with our mutual students. •  Writing centers should be the locus of experimentation and exploration for writing programs.

  32. Intersections How does a writing center construct itself within an institution? How is the writing center constructed by the institution? How does writing center theory construct the classroom, especially the writing classroom?

  33. "It was not the classroom dynamics per se that mattered, as much as student's perceptions of the classroom dynamics" (Cox 117) Hell-bent on collision

  34. Who owns the learning? "In fact, English classrooms may be the site that best illuminates the pedagogical disconnects, because so often the goal is for students to take on authority" (Cox 90). Jeff: well yeah I lacked the vocab to speak on the technical level therefore I feel like the teacher needs to come down to my level bec I’m the one being taught your know because she already knows she’s talking about. She needs to come down to my level to figure out what I’m talking about. And likewise I will learn the vocab over time but I can’t answer the questions using a complex syntax.

  35. Writing and Retention If writing correlates with engagement over any other factor, why isn’t retention 95% in English 1010? Richard Light’s study, “Writing and Students’ Engagement,” surveyed 365 undergraduates about their time commitment, intellectual challenge, and personal engagement in all of their courses. The amount of writing correlated with higher student engagement; in fact, the correlation was stronger than any other characteristic in the course. Writing is different: Maybe part of the problem is because, as one instructor put it, students believe that “if I fix what the teacher says I should get an A.” That is students are well aware of how different writing classes are but they believe it’s unfair, subjective, and ultimately should be more like other classes.

  36. Exploring cognitive dissonance • Dissonance is not necessarily negative • The clash instigates learning, and exploring the clash is where learning takes place • We may run from dissonance, but we should work to understand it • We must explicitly define learning and expose the need for cognitive dissonance • Teacher/Student • Student/Institution • Teacher/Institution • Writing Center/Students /Teacher

  37. Teachers and Institutional pressure When teachers are pressured to increase access but uphold standards: "Not only did teachers speak of the tension between open access and standards; they also revealed the lack of organizational support for dealing with that dichotomy. The administration suggested that faculty should maintain high standards while at the same time retaining students, but teachers did not know how to do both" (Cox 150) Let's trickster this: Instead of resisting administration let's get involved, let's bring forth (as we do here) student voices

  38. Avoiding Cognitive Dissonance: do what the teacher wants "In composition courses...'the get it over' strategy seriously undermined that learning opportunity. For instance Linda's approach to revising her essays consisted of carefully making every change that her teacher recommended...when Linda admitted...that she tried to incorporate changes into her papers even when she didn't understand them, I asked whether she ever asked her teacher to explain those comments. 'I never [pause] no...I just correct them and I just get it over and get it accepted...I don't plan to be an English major'" (Cox 76).  Gabriela's experience

  39. Avoiding cognitive dissonance: drop out I dropped an English 1010 classs. The first one wasn't good…he would lecture about concepts about writing and I felt like the concept was always distant, and it was not connected to me at all. Where as in my current class on the first day we used the "They say I say" book. She gave us a template and we started writing. She didn’t tell us the concepts but made us write, write every day. We are already participating in the concepts whereas my first exp there was this distant concept and now I’m going to put it in some big 5 page paper. Without practicing it. but we write something every day.   Jeff, focus group

  40. Engaging cognitive dissonance I’ve come to understand that in a lot of my classes the teacher's personal point of view comes out. In my 2010 course he talked about the guidelines of the profile. He was talking about people who are more entertainers than…and he took a jab at Glenn Beck…that he doesn’t speak the truth. You know a lot of dems think that. I can just hear it , the tone. Teachers don’t divulge a lot. On the flip side of it in communications 1010…he is very conservative but he always uses Obama as an exp of a great public speaker. So you have these times when you can pick out what a teacher thinks and if you say something against that there is like this immediate rebuttal. Such as my philosophy class talking about the three concepts of god—all powerful, all knowing…omnipresent, omniscient…theoretically he was saying how can it be all three things? I rebuttled him [snaps fingers] and he immediately slammed that down, tarnished it. Jon, Focus Group

  41. Access and Retention: Learning from those who fail "Those of us who argue for improving access to higher education must...take seriously the research on who persists and who does not. Even those composition scholars who do not count access as a priority should consider their responsibilities to the students in their classroom who will not graduate. Students like Connor, George, and Carrie may never walk across the stage in a cap and gown, but they still have a lot to teach us about who we are and what it is we are trying to do" (679 Powell).

  42. Relationship between teacher and student Jeff's comment on voice Michael: initially freaked out, afraid of professors but later found they were pretty cool Tim: relaxed ambiance, whole class talking about movies  Amy's experience with her teacher  "Let's be honest. You write for the teacher." (Shauri, interview)

  43. Peer Review • Students are generally frustrated by the inability of peers to respond to writing. • Students are often uncertain why or how to engage in peer review. • With notable exceptions, instructors are generally not providing thorough instruction on peer review. • Disengaged or intimidated students often resist participation in peer response. • Even students who received instruction, often struggled with peer response. • Engaged students resolve problems with peer groups by identifying other students who are engaged and exchange papers with them. • Student's don't often perceive peer response as "real work" We need to find better ways of teaching peer review. WC offers a good model

  44. Fear "I think some people are intimidated by their professors because they control the grades. And they don't want to look like a fool...." (Cox) "Countless times in my research, I spoke to students who were reluctant to seek professor's assistance, even after the professor explicityly invited them to do so. What was most confusing was that such hesitance did not reflect a disregaud for the course or indifference to doing well. Instead, on one for or another of fear-induced logic--like Elisa's protest that her professor would know how far behind she was on her paper if she were to seek help" (Cox)

  45. 3rd + semester group Starting college English 1010 1st semester group Starting college English 1010 Jonathan 8 3 Amy 10 8 Rex Did not respond Did not respond Nate 4 4 Jeff 7 4 Gabriella Did not respond Did not respond Tim 5 5 Shauri 9 9 Nina 10 10 Michael 8 8 Fear

  46. Hearing Student voices "...too much research on retention focuses on predictors of student success or failure, rather than explanations" (Powell 673).

  47. Works cited     Bruffee, Kenneth A.  A Short Course in Writing, 3rd ed.  Boston, MA:  Little, Brown & Compnany, 1985.     Carino, Peter.  "Early Writing Centers:  Toward a History."  Writing Center Journal.  15.2 (1995). 103-15. Print.     Cox, Rebecca D. The College Fear Factor:  How Students and Professors Misunderstand Each Other.   Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2009.  Print      Geller, Anne Ellen et al.   The Everyday Writing Center:  A Community of Practice.  Logan, Utah:  Utah State P, 2007.  Print.     Harris, Joseph.  A Teacher Subject:  Composition Since 1966.  Upper Saddle River, NJ:  Prentice Hall, 1997.  Print      Hobson, Eric H. "Writing Center Practice Often Coutners Its Theory.  So What?"  Intersections:  Theory-Practice in Writing Centers.  ed by Joan A. Mullin and Ray Wallace.  Urbana, Illinois:  NCTE Press, 1994. 1-10.  Print.      Klausman, Jeffrey.  "Mapping the Terrain:  the two-year Writing Program Administrator."  TETYC:  2008. Web.      McKinney, Jackie Grutsch.  "Leaving Home Sweet Home:  Towards Critical Readings of Writing Centers Spaces."  Writing Center Journal.  25.2 (2005).  6-20.  Print.     Murphy, Christina.  "The Writing Center and Social Constructionist Theory."  Intersections:  Theory-Practice in Writing Centers.  ed by Joan A. Mullin and Ray Wallace.  Urbana, Illinois:  NCTE Press, 1994. 25-38.  Print.     Powell, Pegeen Reichert.  "Retention and Writing Instruction:  Implications for Access and Pedagogy. College Composition and Communication, 60: 4, June 2009. 664-682.  Print.       Riley, Terrance.  "The Unpromissing Future of Writing Centers."  Writing Center Journal.  15.1(1994). 20-34.  Print.

  48. Photography Chicago Daily News Photographer.  "Robert Emmet School, classroom with children sitting at desks, looking toward teacher."  Library of Congress American Memory.  1911.  Web.  3 March 2010. Clark, Jeff.  "big kids' toys." flickr.  Web.  3 March 2010. Gardner, Clint.  "As good a place as any."  flickr. Web. 4 March 2010. --"Summer School No. 1" flickr.  Web. 3 March 2010. kenjonbro, "Collision on a hill."  flickr.  Web.  3 March 2010. Knoth, Matt.  "Trickster Goddess."  flickr.  Web.  3 March 2010. Rhodes, Harry Mellon. "Car Wreck."  Library of Congress American Memory.  1911.  Web.  3 March 2010. "Writing Center (without Writing Center)."  Wordle.  Web.  4 March 2010 .

More Related