1 / 1

An Introduction to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): A Work in Progress

An Introduction to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): A Work in Progress Sarah Khan, Department of Psychology, Honors College, College of Arts & Sciences Mentor: Amy Murrell, Ph.D Department of Psychology, College of Arts & Sciences. Introduction to ACT. Six Core Processes. Purpose.

tender
Download Presentation

An Introduction to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): A Work in Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Introduction to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): A Work in Progress Sarah Khan, Department of Psychology, Honors College, College of Arts & Sciences Mentor: Amy Murrell, Ph.D Department of Psychology, College of Arts & Sciences Introduction to ACT Six Core Processes Purpose Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a type of behavioral therapy used to alter the way people interact with language, specifically so its effect on their psychological and emotional well being is reduced. ACT is based on relational frame theory (RFT), which is based in the philosophy of science known as functional contextualism (Hayes et. al., 2004). Functional contextualism focuses on the context of events and analyzes them in terms of their function (Biglan, 1995). RFT describes how humans create “relational frames” through a learned form of responding that is based on contextual factors as well as a history of conditioning (Hayes et al., 1996). ACT focuses on acceptance of unwanted experiences and emotions, choosing a particular set of values, and acting in a way that is consistent with these values. The main goal of ACT is to encourage clients to do what works in the long term rather than what makes them feel good in the short term (Kohlenberg et al., 1993). • There are six core processes of ACT: • Acceptance: Non-judgmental awareness of self and embracing of all thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations. • Cognitive Defusion: Breaking down literal meanings using paradox, mindfulness, and other means. • Self as Context: A sense of self that is transcendent of a person’s behavior. • Contact with the Present Moment: Being trained to notice what’s present and labeling it without judgment. • Values: The chosen ideas that a person decides to live by. • Committed Action: Defining goals in specific areas and acting in ways to achieve these goals. Further examination of children’s reports of posttraumatic stress symptoms (as measured by the CPSS) may offer insight into children’s experiences following trauma . In addition, examination of how children self-report based on the traditionally utilized adult DSM-IV-TR (2000) PTSD criteria will be conducted . Examination of individual items could lead to information about specific criteria of trauma symptoms that children tend to report (i.e., Do they endorse more avoidance items? More re-experiencing items? More increased arousal?) This may help researchers understand the differences between diagnosing adults and children based on DSM-IV-TR (2000) standards and expose the considerations that must be made in such a diagnosis. Assessing experiential avoidance using AFQ-Y standards may allow researchers to examine whether experiential avoidance plays a similar role in the development and maintenance of PTSS/PTSD in children as it has been found to in adults. Contact with Present Moment Acceptance Values Psychological Flexibility Committed Action References Cognitive Defusion American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author. Biglan, A. (1995). A Science for Changing Cultural Practices. Changing Cultural Practices: A Contextualist Framework for Intervention Research. Reno: Context Press. Hayes, S., Gifford, E., & Wilson, K. (1996). Stimulus classes and stimulus relations: Arbitrarily applicable relational responding as an operant. Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 279-299). New York, NY US: Elsevier Science. Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., Bunting, K., Twohig, M., & Wilson, K.G. (2004). What is Acceptance and Commitment Therapy?. A Practical Guide to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (1 ed., pp. 1-29). New York: Springer. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press. Kohlenberg, R., Hayes, S., & Tsai, M. (1993). Radical behavioral psychotherapy: Two contemporary examples. Clinical Psychology Review, 13(6), 579-592. Experiential Avoidance and PTSD Symptoms in Children Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) include “persistent re-experiencing of the traumatic event, persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, and numbing of general responsiveness, and persistent symptoms of increased arousal”. Experiential avoidance involves excessive negative feelings about previous experiences, a desire to not experience such events, and efforts to control these events (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999). Experiential avoidance is unique in that it encompasses several forms of avoidance including thought suppression, emotional numbing, and actual physical avoidance. For example, a child who experiences a traumatic car accident may subsequently avoid cars altogether in an attempt to avoid feelings related to being in the accident (e.g., fear). In time, this avoidance could directly impact this child’s daily life as it makes it more difficult to transport the child (e.g., to school, sports). Self-As-Context Measures • I will utilize part of a larger project to look at the relationship between two specific measures. This project is a dissertation by Christina M. Larson, M.S. entitled “Symptom Patterns in Children Exposed to Domestic Violence: The Role of Language in Development of Posttraumatic Stress” • Included in this study are various PTSD and avoidance measures for children including: • Conflict Tactics Scale 2 (CTS2): Assesses the prevalence of specific behaviors during interpersonal conflicts • Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL): Parents report the frequency of certain behaviors; used to measure • symptoms of internalizing and externalizing • Centrality of Events Scale, Shortened Version (CES): An assessment of cognitive fusion with an event • The measures I will look at include: • The Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS): Used to assess children’s posttraumatic stress symptoms and • symptom severity. The test is based on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for PTSD. Children are asked to specify a • traumatic or distressing event and answer questions about the event. • Sample items: “Having bad dreams or nightmares” or “Feeling upset when you think about it or hear about the event” • Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y): Measures the extent to which the individual over- • identifies with negative thoughts, feelings, and experiences • Sample items: “I push away thoughts and feelings that I don’t like.” and “I am afraid of my feelings.” Acknowledgments Amy Murrell, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology Wendy K. Wilkins, Ph.D., Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Gloria C. Cox, Ph.D., Dean, Honors College Andrea Kirk, Ph.D., Lecturer, Honors College The UNT Contextual Psychology Lab I would like to thank Christina Larson and Jonathan Schmalz for their invaluable assistance and guidance with this project.

More Related