1 / 9

Administrative Review

Administrative Review. Michelle Kelleher Science Assistant Division of Environmental Biology. 21 October 2005. NSF Proposal Generating Document. Returned without Review: Inappropriate, Not Responsive to the GPG, Withdrawn. Minimum of 3 Reviews Required. Award. Via DGA.

tanika
Download Presentation

Administrative Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Administrative Review Michelle Kelleher Science Assistant Division of Environmental Biology 21 October 2005

  2. NSF Proposal Generating Document Returned without Review: Inappropriate, Not Responsive to the GPG, Withdrawn Minimum of 3 Reviews Required Award Via DGA Organization submits via: FastLane Program Officer Analysis & Recom. Mail Division Director Concur Panel Both NSF Program Officer Organization Research & Education Communities Decline Proposal Receipt at NSF Award 30 Days 90+ Days 6 Months Proposal Receipt to Division Director Concurrence of Program Officer Recommendation DGA Review & Processing of Award Proposal Preparation Time NSF Proposal & Award Process & Timeline Proposal Processing Unit DD Concur

  3. Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) • Provides guidance for preparation and submission of proposals to NSF • Specifies process for deviations including individual program solicitations • Describes process -- and criteria -- by which proposals will be reviewed • Outlines reasons why a proposal may be returned without review

  4. Proposal Preparation • Follow the Rules! • Grant Proposal Guide – GPG http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg

  5. BIO Compliance Checking • At a minimum, all programs in BIO compliance check for 3 items • Font size & spacing: • must be >= 10 pt font size • type density <=15 characters per 2.5 cm (one inch) • vertical spacing <= 6 lines per vertical space of 2.5 cm (one inch) • Number of pages: max. 15 pages for project description

  6. BIO Compliance Checking • Project Summary must clearly address in separate statements(1) intellectual merit and (2) broader impacts. Proposals that do not separately address both merit review criteria within the one page project summary will be returned without review.

  7. Additional Requirements That May Be Checked • Some programs in BIO may have additional requirements that will be included in the compliance check. • For example: • DDIG: letter of candidacy • Ecosystems Studies: List of collaborators Check the Program Announcement!

  8. General Notes • Font size must satisfy all GPG requirements. • Follow page limit. • Address Broader Impacts and Intellectual Merit in the project summary. • Fill out all forms honestly and accurately. • Spell check and grammar check. • Double check AFTER FastLane upload.

  9. Questions or Concerns? • NSF website: http://www.nsf.gov/funding/preparing • Consult the GPG • Technical/procedural questions: Contact the FastLane Help Desk fastlane@nsf.gov or 1-800-673-6188. • Contact the Program Director

More Related