1 / 9

Administrative Review Process

Administrative Review Process. CSU MPP Evaluation Process. All MPPs must be evaluated at least once a year as part of the annual evaluation process. 360° Feedback Process. Integrate with the annual evaluation process

jrosemarie
Download Presentation

Administrative Review Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Administrative Review Process

  2. CSU MPP Evaluation Process All MPPs must be evaluated at least once a year as part of the annual evaluation process.

  3. 360° Feedback Process • Integrate with the annual evaluation process • Feedback - initiated by the President or Vice Presidents for their Administrator III and IV managers • Feedback to be provided to the President and respective VPs

  4. Review Schedule • Initial Review – in the first 12 – 18 months of employment. • Subsequent reviews - 3 years following the initial review; follow up every 3 years thereafter.

  5. 360° Evaluation Feedback - up to 15, including: • Open invitation for feedback to the college, department, or division the Administrator oversees • 2 faculty identified by the Academic Senate; • 1 student identified by ASI; • Individuals recommended by the individual being evaluated.

  6. 360° Evaluations • Recommendations from the immediate supervisor; -at least 2 reporting directly or indirectly • Feedback from the search committee members; for the initial review.

  7. Evaluation Conclusion • Feedback provided to President/Vice President or other Appropriate Administrator evaluator and respective VPs; • Feedback cannot be anonymous; • Evaluator completes and presents evaluation approved by the VP to the Administrator

  8. Next Steps • Spring ’18 - Implementation timeframe • Presidential Memorandum - finalize • Survey instrument - finalize • Identify/calendar Administrators to be evaluated.

  9. Administrative Review Process Timeline

More Related