Changes in Perceptions of Guideline-level Care for ADHD in North Carolina

1. Changes in Perceptions of Guideline-level Care for ADHD in North Carolina Charles Humble*, Marisa Domino†, Peter Jensen‡, Chris Kratochvilэ, Alan Stiles† ,Treiste Newton*, Lynn Wegner †‡, Steve Wegner*† , *AccessCare †UNC-CH Departments of Pediatrics and Health Policy & Management ‡Resource for Advancing Children’s Health (REACH) Institute эUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center APHA Annual Meeting, Mental Health Workforce 4135.0: October 30, 2012

2. Presenter Disclosures Charles Humble, PhD The following personal financial relationships with commercial interests relevant to this presentation existed during the past 12 months: No relationships to disclose

3. Concerns with Current Pediatric Psychopharmacology • Many children with behavioral health problems are never identified, diagnosed, or treated • POOR Access to clinicians adequately trained in recognizing, diagnosing, and treating behavioral health problems is widespread nationally • Growing evidence informs guidelines and practice parameters, BUT primary care clinicians are often unaware of these guidelines or unable to implement them in their practices

4. Background for North Carolina Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the most common behavioral health problem in children and adolescents Over last 7 years access to North Carolina’s public mental health programs has been challenged by re-design and funding cuts.

5. Program Goals Give Primary Care Providers (PCP) and Pediatric Residents the knowledge, skills, and tools needed to properly diagnose and manage ADHD and other common behavioral health conditions in the Medical Home Assess the possible added impact of training Case Managers (CM) with the knowledge, skills and tools needed to evaluate response to management plans and optimize adherence to management plans for care of children with ADHD

6. Provider Education Primary Care Providers (PCP)(Nov 2009) 3-day training in diagnosis of pediatric behavioral problems and primary pediatric psychopharmacology management (PPPM) biweekly conference calls for 6 mo. Care Managers (Nov 2009) 1-day training in PPPM biweekly conference calls for 6 mo. Pediatric Residents (Aug & Sep 2010) 1-day training in PPPM

7. Training Agenda • Identify common ground and gaps between Primary Care & Child Psychiatry • Discuss what is required to change how PCPs practice; reinforce thru role playing • Review personal areas of need, set goals • Create Virtual Treatment Teams through bi-weekly conference calls

8. Final Samples • ~ Half of sites randomized to Active Intervention & Standard Care Control Groups before training • After deletion of 2 no-shows, 2 non-clinicians, 2 drop-outs, 1 hospitalist & non-AccessCare MD AND addition of 3 new CM : 17 Activepractices: 15 CM/ 26 providers 14 Control practices: 11 CM/ 22 providers

9. Post-Training Data Collection Up to 44 of 48 PCPs responded surveys describing: • Current Practice Characteristics • Norms of care in practices similar to their own • Knowledge of, comfort with, beliefs in, and intention to implement and implementation of guideline-level care for ADHD • Surveys administered immediately after training and again 6 & 12 months later

10. Basic Demographics of PCPs Provider Types Avg Sizes of Patient Panels

11. PCP “Comfort” with Knowledge of Selected Behavioral Health Conditions[Time of Training]

12. PCP Attitudes re Clinical Practice Guidelines(CPG) * p < .05 Extremely Favorable ExtremelyUnfavorable

13. Approval of CPG Usage by Colleagues * p < .05 ** p < .01 Strongly Disapprove Strongly Approve

14. Perceived Ability to Use CPGs for ADHD * p < .05 ** p < .01 Very Hard Extremely Easy

15. PCP-perceived Obstacles to Optimal Care * p < .05 ** p < .01 *** p < .001 Never an Obstacle Always an Obstacle

16. Chart Review Data re:PCP Use of 1+ Parent VD Rating ScalesPre- vs. Post-Training (n=188) *** • * p<.05 • ** p<.01 • *** p<.00001 ** * Time Post ADHD Diagnosis

17. Chart Review Data re:PCP Use of 1+ Teacher VD Rating ScalesPre- vs. Post-Training (n=188) ** * p<.01 ** p<.001 * * Time Post ADHD Diagnosis

18. Chart Review Data re:PCP Use of 1+ Parent SE Rating ScalesPre- vs. Post-Training (n=188) --No significant differences -- Time Post ADHD Diagnosis

19. Conclusions PCPs retained their positive attitudes toward guideline-level ADHD treatments for pediatric patients 12 months after an intense 3-day training Perceived attitudes of colleagues toward use of most CPGs for ADHD care remained high or increased Perceived ability to use most CPGs for ADHD care remained high or increased Most perceived Obstacles to guideline-use diminished over the 12 months of follow-up Chart reviews show increased use of ADHD symptom screeners and greater frequency of F/U visits

20. Limitations • Baseline data were collected after the initial training • Can infer a training effect from initial high rankings • Analyses test changes relative to these high levels & most directly test effects of biweekly conference calls (6 mo.) • Sample sizes of 38 to 44 /survey limit analytic power • Fixed Effect models found stable or modest levels of improvement for most outcome measures. • Supplemental analyses using Change Models will attempt to identify individual participants with greatest likelihood for improved outcomes.

21. Study Significance Findings support the value of extended PCP training in guideline-level care for ADHD Findings are informing rollout of other Behavioral Health programs in NC’s Medicaid program May also influence use of REACH model in other states now adopting the Medical Home model for their Medicaid clients

22. Major support for this project comes from ARRA Grant # 1RC1MH088922-01.The authors thank Dr. Lisa Hunter, Melanie Louis and Courtney Sanderson for their many contributions to this program. Timothy O’Brien & Matt Caldwell helped with the analyses. For more information contact Charles Humble, PhD chumble@ncaccesscare.org