1 / 31

Visual Inspection and Condition Evaluation

Visual Inspection and Condition Evaluation . (Bridge #1618-150 in Wayne, NJ) Jungseok Lee*, Namhee Jin, Jongchul Kim & Soobong Shin PEC, KCQRC & Inha Univ. Republic of Korea. Contents. Introduction of Bridge Inspection System of Korea Summary of Visual Inspection Results

talasi
Download Presentation

Visual Inspection and Condition Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Visual Inspection and Condition Evaluation (Bridge #1618-150 in Wayne, NJ) Jungseok Lee*, Namhee Jin, Jongchul Kim & Soobong Shin PEC, KCQRC & Inha Univ. Republic of Korea

  2. Contents • Introduction of Bridge Inspection System of Korea • Summary of Visual Inspection Results • Summary of NDT Results • Result of Condition Evaluation • Intervention for Repair

  3. Introduction • Special Law for the Safety Maintenance of Infrastructures • Established in 1995 just after the tragic collapse of Sungsu Bridge in Korea • Regulation for maintenance of important infrastructures • KISTEC(Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation) was established by Government according to this law which is responsible for the safety maintenance of important infrastructures • All guidelines and manuals for inspection and condition evaluation have been made by KISTEC under the supervision of Korean Government

  4. Introduction • Classification of Inspection • Initial Inspection • After construction, widening, strengthening, etc. • Routine Inspection • Every 6 months • Brief inspection for important and/or damaged members • Precision Inspection • Every 2 years • Detail inspection for all members & NDT • Condition evaluation • In-depth Inspection • Every 5 years • Precision inspection & structural safety assessment • Damage Inspection • Unscheduled inspection for the environmental attack or car accident

  5. Introduction • Procedure of Condition Evaluation of a Bridge • 3-stage condition evaluation [element-level] → [span-level] → [bridge-level] Element-level CE span-level CE for girder span-level CE for Pavement support-level CE for Pier • • Avg. Element-level CE Element-level CE defect investigation Weighting on members Minimum level Bridge-level CE

  6. Introduction • Condition Rating at Element Level • Classification and Grades for Elements • Primary structural members : a – e • Secondary or non-structural members : a – d

  7. Introduction • Categories of CE at Element Level • Concrete Slabs • Steel members(slabs, girders, piers, pylons) • Reinforced concrete girders • Pre-stressed concrete girders • Concrete cross beams • Steel cross beams and stringers • Cables • Abutments • Concrete piers • Footing, piles, caissons • Bearings • Expansion joints • Pavement • Drainage • Railings and curbs • Carbonation • Chloride content * Total 17 categories (15 member groups and 2 concrete material tests)

  8. Introduction • Criterion for Concrete Slabs • cw : crack width • cr : crack ratio = crack area / surface area (crack area = length x 0.25m) • Ac : damaged concrete area • Acs : damaged concrete area with reduction of sectional area of reinforcement by corrosion

  9. Introduction • Criterion for Steel Members(Slabs, Girders, Piers, etc.) • Nbs: # of damaged bolts on secondary members • Nbm: # of damaged bolts on main members • Asp: Damaged painting area of steel members • Asc: Corroded area of steel members • Asl: Corroded area with sectional loss of steel members

  10. Introduction • Criterion for Concrete Piers • cw : crack width • Ac : damaged concrete area • Acs : damaged concrete area with reduction of sectional area of reinforcement by corrosion

  11. Introduction • Condition Rating at Bridge Level • A to E • Results from visual inspection and NDT

  12. Introduction • Condition Rating at Bridge Level • Weighting Factors

  13. Introduction • Condition Rating at Bridge Level • Result of Condition Evaluation • Damage Index (DI)

  14. Summary of Visual Inspection • Concrete Slabs • Deck plates : good condition (no delamination, no leakage) • Concrete slabs : good condition with small lateral cracks (Deck plates) (Cracks in cantilever of slabs)

  15. Summary of Visual Inspection • Steel Plate Girders • Inner girders : good condition (no corrosion) (Inner girders) (End of inner girder)

  16. Summary of Visual Inspection • Steel Plate Girders • Outer girders : poor condition (severe corrosion with sectional loss on lower flanges) (Outer girders) (End of outer girder)

  17. Summary of Visual Inspection • Steel Plate Girders • Fatigue cracks on webs were reported in DOT reports • but couldn’t indentify by visual inspection • induced by vibration of lateral bracing due to differential deflection of girders (Crack with stopholes) (Location of web cracks, drawing by UT) (Crack without stopholes)

  18. Summary of Visual Inspection • Concrete Piers • Good condition • Shear cracks and spalling were developed on the vertical surface of P1 southbound caused by omitting vertical reinforcements in the pier cap on the top of column • Bending cracks were developed underside of pier cap of P2 (Shear crack of pier cap) (Bending crack of pier cap)

  19. Summary of Visual Inspection • Abutment (A1) • Poor condition • Severe vertical cracks and fault were developed • Severe shear cracks were developed both side surface (Crack and fault of A1)

  20. Summary of Visual Inspection • Abutment (A2) • Poor condition • Severe vertical cracks on the parapet and severe shear cracks were developed both side surface (Crack and fault of A2)

  21. Summary of Visual Inspection • Bearings • Under inner girders : good condition • Under outer girders : poor condition (corrosion and sectional loss) (Inner bearing) (Outer bearing)

  22. Summary of NDT • Concrete NDT • Compressive Strength • Rebound test using Schmidt Hammer (Column) (Pier Cap) (Abutment)

  23. Summary of NDT • Compressive Strength • Design Strength : 21 Mpa • Compressive strength of piers and abutments is estimated to exceed the design strength

  24. Summary of NDT • Arrangement of Re-bars • Using handy GPR(Ground Penetrating Radar) • Measuring rebar spacing and concrete cover depth (Abutmrnt) (Pier Cap)

  25. Summary of NDT • Arrangement of Re-bars • Compared with design values • Good matching except slight difference in horizontal re-bars of abutment

  26. Summary of NDT • Steel NDT • Sectional Loss of Steel Members • Thickness measurement using ultrasonic equipment • Sectional loss of outer steel girders by corrosion (Thickness measurement of lower flange of steel girders)

  27. Summary of NDT • Sectional Loss of Steel Members • Lower flange of outer girder southbound • Original thickness : 25.4 mm • Measured thickness : 25.0 mm • Sectional loss rate : 1.6%

  28. Result of Condition Evaluation

  29. (Special Consideration on Cracks & Spalls in Pier Cap) • Vehicle Loading • AASHTO LRFD Code (HS 20-44 +10% load scale) • Multiple presence factor for 4 lanes (1.2 / 1 / 0.85 / 0.65) • Reactions to Vehicle Loading • Maximum Vertical Reaction Non-dimensional Reaction Force

  30. (Special Consideration on Cracks & Spalls in Pier Cap) • Possible Reasons for Cracks & Spalls • Largest reaction force • Missing of vertical & lateral wrapping reinf. • Concrete cover thickness < 2” missing

  31. Intervention for Repair • Outer Girders • Removing Rust and painting is needed to prevent further corrosion and sectional loss • Bearings under outer girders • Severely corroded bearings should be changed for proper movement by thermal expansion • Abutments • Severe cracks and inclination due to structural deficiency • Hard to decide the safety of Abutments at this time • Need to monitor the behavior of abutments using crack meters and inclinometers

More Related