1 / 193

May 3, 2006

Complexities for the Design of Self-Assembly Systems. May 3, 2006. Robert Schweller Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department Northwestern University Email: schwellerr@cs.northwestern.edu http://www.cs.northwestern.edu/~schwellerr/. Outline. Background, Motivation Model

taffy
Download Presentation

May 3, 2006

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Complexities for the Design of Self-Assembly Systems May 3, 2006 Robert SchwellerElectrical Engineering and Computer Science Department Northwestern University Email: schwellerr@cs.northwestern.edu http://www.cs.northwestern.edu/~schwellerr/

  2. Outline • Background, Motivation • Model • Temperature Programming • Flexible Glue Self-Assembly • Shape Verification • Future Work

  3. Molecular Building Blocks T G C G A C G C

  4. Molecular Building Blocks [John Reif’s Group, Duke University]

  5. DNA Scaffolding [Sung Ha Park, Constantin Pistol, Sang Jung Ahn, John H. Reif, Alvin R. Lebeck, Chris Dwyer, and Thomas H. LaBean, 2006]

  6. Simulation of Cellular Automata Paul Rothemund, Nick Papadakis, Erik Winfree, PLoS Biology 2: e424 (2004) 340nm

  7. Outline • Background, Motivation • Model • Temperature Programming • Shape Verification • Flexible Glue Self-Assembly • Future Work

  8. Tile Model of Self-Assembly (Rothemund, Winfree STOC 2000) Tile System: t : temperature, positive integer G: glue function T: tileset s: seed tile

  9. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  10. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  11. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  12. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  13. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  14. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  15. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  16. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  17. How a tile system self assembles G(y) = 2 G(g) = 2 G(r) = 2 G(b) = 2 G(p) = 1 G(w) = 1 t = 2 T =

  18. Each Shape Requires a Distinct Tile Set

  19. Programmable, General Purpose Tile Set?

  20. Programmable, General Purpose Tile Set? . . .

  21. Outline • Background, Motivation • Model • Temperature Programming • Flexible Glue Self-Assembly • Shape Verification • Future Work

  22. Multiple Temperature Model Multiple Temperature Model - temperature may go up and down

  23. Multiple Temperature Model Multiple Temperature Model - temperature may go up and down t < t1 , t2 , ... , tr-1 , tr >

  24. Multiple Temperature Model Multiple Temperature Model - temperature may go up and down t < t1 , t2 , ... , tr-1 , tr > Tile Complexity: Number of Tiles Temperature Complexity: Number of Temperatures

  25. Building k x n Rectangles k-digit, base n(1/k) counter: k n

  26. Building k x n Rectangles k-digit, base n(1/k) counter: k n Tile Complexity:

  27. two temperatures t= 4 3 1 3 3 n

  28. two temperatures t = 4 6 n

  29. two temperatures Tile Complexity: t = 4 6 n

  30. two temperatures Tile Complexity: t = 4 6 n Kolmogorov Complexity (Rothemund, Winfree STOC 2000) Beats Standard Model

  31. Programmable, General Purpose Tile Set? . . .

  32. High Level Approach Given: n 1011001 log n

  33. High Level Approach Given: n 1011001 log n 1 temp

  34. High Level Approach Given: n 1011001 log n 1 temp 1

  35. High Level Approach Given: n 1011001 log n 1 0 temp 1 0

  36. High Level Approach Given: n 1011001 log n 1 0 1 1 0 . . . . . . temp 1 0 1 1 0 0 1

  37. High Level Approach . . . 0 0 1 . . . temp 1 0 1 1 0 0 1

  38. High Level Approach . . . 0 0 1 . . . temp 1 0 1 1 0 0 1

  39. High Level Approach . . . 0 0 1 . . . temp 1 0 1 1 0 0 1

  40. Assembly of n x n Squares N - k k

  41. Assembly of n x n Squares n - k k

  42. Assembly of n x n Squares n - k k

  43. Assembly of n x n Squares n - k Complexity: k

  44. Assembly of n x n Squares n – log n Complexity: log n

  45. Assembly of n x n Squares n – log n Complexity: seed row log n

  46. Encoding a Single Bit 0 0 1 0 1 0’ 1’ z z 1 z Z g g g g g g g g a g g

  47. Encoding a Single Bit t = < 2 > 0 0 1 0 1 0’ 1’ z z 1 z Z g g g g g g g g a g g a

  48. Encoding a Single Bit t = < 2 > 0 0 1 0 1 0’ 1’ z z 1 z Z g g g g g g g g a g g a

  49. Encoding a Single Bit t = < 2 > 0 0 1 0 1 0’ 1’ z z 1 z Z g g g g g g g g a g g a

  50. Encoding a Single Bit t = < 2 > 0 0 1 0 1 0’ 1’ z z 1 z Z g g g g g g g g a g g a

More Related