1 / 34

Neutrons as Manipulable Quantum Objects

Neutrons as Manipulable Quantum Objects. Helmut Rauch Atominstitut der Österreichischen Universitäten, Wien. Particle-Wave Properties Basics of Neutron Interferometry Quantum State Preparation and Measurement Magnetic Noise Dephasing and Decoherencing Topological Phases

tab
Download Presentation

Neutrons as Manipulable Quantum Objects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Neutrons as Manipulable Quantum Objects Helmut Rauch Atominstitut der Österreichischen Universitäten, Wien Particle-Wave Properties Basics of Neutron Interferometry Quantum State Preparation and Measurement Magnetic Noise Dephasing and Decoherencing Topological Phases Quantum Contextuality Kochen-Specker Phenomenon

  2. The Neutron Particle Properties Wave Properties CONNECTION de Broglie Schrödinger & boundary conditions For thermal neutrons = 1.8 Å, 2200 m/s

  3. Quantum skier Interferometer experiment

  4. Neutron Interferometry

  5. Interferometer family

  6. NEUTRON INTERFEROMETER SET-UP S18 AT ILL GRENOBLE

  7. Wave packet in ordinary and momentum space Spatial distribution Non-classical state Coherent state Momentum distribution

  8. Different quantum states Non-classical state (Schrödinger cat-like state) Coherent state

  9. State presentations Schrödinger Equation: Partial waves fill the whole space Wave Function (Eigenvalue solution in free space): and others (Wigner function etc.) Momentum distribution: Spatial distribution: Coherence Function: Stationary situation:

  10. D1 D2 Wave Packet Structure M.Baron, H.Rauch, M.Suda, J.Opt.B5 (2003) S341

  11. Dynamical and Geometrical Phases

  12. Spinor Symmetry n Theory: H.J.Bernstein, Phys.Rev.Lett. 18(1967)1102, Y.Aharonov, L.Susskind, Phys.Rev. 158(1967)1237 Experiment:H.Rauch, A.Zeilinger, G.Badurek, A.Wilfing, W.Bauspiess, U.Bonse, Phys.Lett. 54A(1975)425 S.A.Werner, R.Colella, A.W.Overhauser, C.F.Eagen, Phys.Rev.Lett. 35(1975)1053 A.G.Klein, G.I.Opat, Phys.Rev. D11(1976)523 E.Klempt, Phys.Rev. D13(1975)3125 M.E.Stoll, E.K.Wolff, M.Mehring, Phys.Rev. A17(1978)1561

  13. Topological Phase Theory: S.Pancharatnam, Proc.Ind.Acad.Sci. A44(1956)247 M.V.Berry, Proc.Roy.Soc.London, A392(1984)415 J.Anandan,Nature360(1992)307; R.Bhandari,Phys.Rep.281(1977)1  ........... dynamical phase ... geometric phase  Experiment.:A.G.Wagh, V.C.Rakhecha, J.Summhammer, G.Badurek, H.Weinfurter, B.E.Allman, H.Kaiser, K.Hamacher, D.L.Jacobson, S.A.Werner, Phys.Rev.Lett. 78(1997)755

  14. Geometric Phase Berry Phase (adiabatic & cyclic evolution) [ Berry; Proc.R.S.Lond. A 392, 45 (1984)] Ω (for 2-level systems) Non-adiabatic evolution Non-adiabatic & non-cyclic evolution [Aharonov & Anandan, PRL 58, 1593 (1987) [Samuel & Bhandari, PRL 60, 2339 (1988)]

  15. Non-adiabatic & Non-cyclic Phase Results: Cancelling dynamical phase, if S. Filipp, Y. Hasegawa, R. Loidl and H. Rauch, Phys.Rev. A72 (2005) 021602

  16. Future Prospects: Decoherence [De Chiara and Palma, PRL 91, 090404 (2003)] Variance of geometric phase (sg2) tends to 0 for increasing time of evolution in magnetic field.

  17. Dephasing at low order Magnetic noise fields M.Baron, H.Rauch, M.Suda (in progress)

  18. Dephasing at high order M.Baron, H.Rauch, M.Suda,J.Opt.B5 (2003) S244

  19. Magnetic Noise Field Contrast reduction Momentum smearing Theory C = C0exp[-(μΔBDeff/ћv)2/2]

  20. Quantum Contextuality and Kochen-Specker phenomenon

  21. EPR - Experiment A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777.

  22. Two-particle vs. two-space entanglement -2 < S < 2 S = E(α1,χ1) - E(α1,χ2) + E(α2,χ1) + E(α2,χ2) ==>> (Non-)Contextuality (In)Dependent Results for commuting Observables

  23. Contextuality Experiment .Y.Hasegawa, R.Loidl, G.Badurek, M.Baron, H.Rauch, Nature 425 (2003) 45 and Phys.Rev.Lett.97 (2006) 230401

  24. Manipulation of two-subspaces (a) Path (b) Spin

  25. Result: S = 2.051 ± 0.019 Theory: SMax = 2.82 Classical correlation: (hidden variables) -2 < S´ < 2 Contextuality Results

  26. Non-locality & contextuality

  27. Kochen-Specker Theory S. Kochen, E.P. Specker, J. Math. Mech. 17 (1967) 59

  28. Kochen-Specker Theory

  29. Theory

  30. Experimental setup

  31. Results = -0.610(8) = -0.667(8) = -0.861(10) Y. Hasegawa, R. Loidl, G. Badurek, M. Baron, H. Rauch, Phys.Rev.Lett. 97 (2006) 230401

  32. Results and contradiction Ideally Eexp = +1 Emsr = -1 } Ex = -0.610 Enc = ExEy= +0.407 Ey = -0.667 Emeasured = -0.861 perfect contradiction Y. Hasegawa, R. Loidl, G. Badurek, M. Baron, H. Rauch, Phys.Rev.Lett. 97 (2006) 230401

  33. Kochen-Specker phenomenon Cnon-contextual = Cclassic = 2 Ccontextual = Cquantum = 4 Cexperimental = 3.138(15) Y.Hasegawa, R.Loidl, G. Badurek, M.Baron, H.Rauch, PRL 97 (2006) 23040 A cartoon-like representation of quantum contextuality. The colour of a skier‘s jacket (the spinor-property in our experiment) is undetermined, represented by a superposition before other mesurements. After a ‘measurement‘ on the colour of his trousers (a measurement on the path in our experiment), his jacket automatically gets its own colours (the direction of spin is determined accordingly), depending on what was measued, e.g., blue- or orange-colours. Basically no correlation between the colours of jacket and trousers is expected!

  34. Thank You

More Related