Biostatistic biomedic group 5
Download
1 / 36

BIOSTATISTIC BIOMEDIC GROUP 5 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Uploaded on

BIOSTATISTIC BIOMEDIC GROUP 5. Title. Possession of the transferrable skills on employability among first year undergraduates of FSK, FFAR, and FGG of UKM. Introduction. Introduction What is transferable skills? What is the importance in employability?.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' BIOSTATISTIC BIOMEDIC GROUP 5 ' - sylvia-walsh


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Biostatistic biomedic group 5

BIOSTATISTICBIOMEDIC GROUP 5


Title
Title

  • Possession of the transferrable skills on employability among first year undergraduates of FSK, FFAR, and FGG of UKM.



Introduction what is transferable skills what is the importance in employability

IntroductionWhat is transferable skills?What is the importance in employability?

Known as key skills, generic skills, core skills, soft skills or so on

Skills which are required in almost any job (Stewart et al. 2000)

There are groups of skills requirements for employability such as communication skills, team working, problem-solving skills, leadership qualities and interpersonal skills. (Petrova 2001)



Research justification
Research Justification university graduates as compared to academic background, proficiency in the English language, performance in interview, adaptability to company culture and experience of internship. (Ranjit & Wahab 2008).

  • To evaluate the possession of transferable skills on employability among students in UKM.

  • Graduate employers seek a range of transferable skills and qualities that students need to be able to demonstrate in selection processes (CAES, 1997; Harvey et al., 1997; Williams and Owen, 1997)

  • Most of the employers now are expecting students to possess the transferable skills rather than results with flying colours.

  • Reveal that whether third year students in UKM KL is competent enough in terms of employability.


Research question
RESEARCH QUESTION university graduates as compared to academic background, proficiency in the English language, performance in interview, adaptability to company culture and experience of internship. (Ranjit & Wahab 2008).

  • Is there any difference in the possession of transferrable skills among third year undergraduate students from the Faculty of Health Sciences, Faculty of Dental and Faculty of Pharmacy in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM)?


General objective
GENERAL OBJECTIVE university graduates as compared to academic background, proficiency in the English language, performance in interview, adaptability to company culture and experience of internship. (Ranjit & Wahab 2008).

  • To study the possession of transferrable skills among the third year undergraduate students from Faculty of Health Sciences (FSK), Faculty of Dental (FGG) and Faculty of Pharmacy (FFAR) in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Campus Kuala Lumpur.


Specific objectives
Specific Objectives university graduates as compared to academic background, proficiency in the English language, performance in interview, adaptability to company culture and experience of internship. (Ranjit & Wahab 2008).

  • To explore the possession of transferrable skills for employability among the 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

  • To get to know wether the 3rd undergraduate students know what transferrable skills are all about.

  • To educate the 3rd year students the importance of transferrable skills for employability



Research hypothesis
Research Hypothesis 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

  • Ho : The possession of transferrable skills among 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK, FGG and FFAR were not different

    Ho : µ1=µ2=µ3

  • HA: The possession of transferrable skills among 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK, FGG and FFAR were different


Conceptual framework 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

Extracurricular activities

Working Experience

Race

Professors Addressing Skills in Class

Gender

Possession of Transferable skills

Faculty

Employability of Graduates

Hint:

Strong

Weak

Uncertain


Materials and methods

materials and methods 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.


Materials and method
Materials and Method 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

  • Demographic Profile

    • Name

    • Age

    • Gender: Male and Female

    • Race: Malay, Chinese, India, and other

    • Faculty: Dentistry, Pharmacy, Health Science

    • Program: Biomedical Science, Nutrition, Environmental Health and Optometry

    • Working experience: duration

    • Involvement of co-curriculum activities


  • Duration of study 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

    • Two weeks for data collection

    • Questionnaires are distributed among third year students

    • Proportional sampling method

    • Simple random sampling method

    • Two week for data analysis.

    • Descriptive statistics

    • Statistical analysis

    • Two week for writing report

    • Result recorded


Study population
Study Population 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

  • Third year undergraduates from:

    - Faculty of Health Science:

    - Biomedical Science

    - Optometry

    - Environmental Health

    - Nutrition

    - Faculty of Dentistry

    - Faculty of Pharmacy


Sampling method
Sampling method 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

  • Proportional random sampling method


Inclusion exclusion factors
Inclusion / exclusion factors 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

  • Inclusive criteria:

    - Third year undergraduates from courses of Faculty of Health Sciences:

    i. Biomedical Science

    ii. Nutrition

    iii.Optometry

    iv.Environmental Health Science

    -Third year undergraduates from Faculty of Dentistry

    -Third year undergraduates from Faculty of Pharmacy


Exclusive criteria 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

Third year undergraduates of :

  • Biomedical Science students from Biostatistic Group 5

  • Occupational Therapy

  • Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy

  • Speech Therapy

  • Audiology

  • Forensic Science

  • Physiotherapy

  • Dietetic


Sample size calculation
Sample Size Calculation 3rd year undergraduate students of FSK,FGG and FFAR.

  • Formula used to calculate sample size for selected population with known population size :


  • Thus, a total of 187 persons will be chosen for our study from third year undergraduates of Faculty of Health Science, Faculty of Dentistry and Faculty of Pharmacy


Sample size for each population
Sample Size for Each Population Hence, 10% is added to the sample size of 170


Dummy table questionnaire
Dummy Table Questionnaire Hence, 10% is added to the sample size of 170


Gantt chart
Gantt chart Hence, 10% is added to the sample size of 170


Reference
Reference Hence, 10% is added to the sample size of 170

  • 1. Bennett, N., et al. (2000) Skills development in higher education and employment. The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press

  • 2. Atkins, M. J. (1999). Oven-ready and self-basting: Taking stock of employability skills. Teaching in Higher Education, 4(2), 267-280.

  • 3. Billing, D. (2003). Generic cognitive abilities in higher education: An international analysis of skills sought by stakeholders. Compare, 33(3), 335-350.

  • 4. Hofstrand, R. (1996). Getting all the skills employers want. Techniques: Making Education & Career Connections, 71(8), 51.

  • 5. Crebert, G., Bates, M., Bell, B., Patrick, C-J, & Cragnolini, V. (2004a). Ivory tower to concrete jungle revisited. Journal of Education and Work, 17(1), 47-70.


  • 6. Murtonen, Mari, Erkki Olkinuora, Paivi Tynjala, and Erno Lehtinen. 2008. “‘Do I need Research Skills in Working Life?’: University students’ motivation and difficulties in quantitative methods courses.” Higher Education 56(5):599-612.

  • 7. Hall, L., Harris, J., Bakewell, C., and Graham, P. (2000), “Supporting placement-based learning using networked technologies”, The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(4), 175-179

  • 8. Baird, D. (2005), Work Getting the Most from Work Experience, New Law Journal, 155(7167), 360-361

  • 9. Lawy, R., Bloomer, M., & Biesta, G. (2004). School’s just a catalyst: Knowledge, learning and identity and the post-16 curriculum. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56(2), 205–226.

  • 10. Hager, P. (2004). The competence affair or why vocational education and training urgently needs a new understanding of learning. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56(3), 409–433.


  • 11. Stevenson, J. (2005). The centrality of vocational learning. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 57(3), 335–355.

  • 12. Deesha Chadha (2006). A curriculum model for transferable skills development. Journal of the Higher Education Engineering Subject Centre, 1(1)

  • 13. Catriona Paisey, Nicholas J. Paisey (2009). Developing skills via work placement in accounting : studenta and employer views. Accounting Forum, 34(2010) 89-108

  • 14. George Brown, Yussuf Ahmed (2009). The value of work placements. Enhancing The Learning Experience in Higher Education, 1(1)

  • 15, R. Bertelsen, D. Chadha (1999). A Review of Good Practice, University of Surrey. TRANSEND (Transferable Skills in Engineering and their Dissemination)


  • 16. R. Dearing (1997). Higher Education in a Learning Society, HMSO, London. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education

  • 17. Harvey, L., & Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press (October).

  • 18. Britzman, D. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. Albany State: University of New York Press.

  • 19. Pascarella, E.T. & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • 20. Kezar, A. (2006) Examining the ways institutions create student engagement: The role of mission. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 149-172.


  • 21. Brian A. Burt, Donald D. Carpenter, Cynthia J. Finelli & Trevor Scott Harding (2011) Outcomes Of Engaging Engineering Undergraduates In Co-curricular Experiences. American Society for Engineering Education.

  • 22. Cruez, A. F. 2003. Jobless graduates lack critical skills. New Straits Times, 20 August: 9.

  • 23. Dodrige, M., 1999. Generic Skill Requirements for Engineers in the 21st Century, 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference. San Juan, Puerto Rico. November 10 – 13

  • 24. Gretar T. & Diran A., 2006. Re-Engineering Engineering Education for the Challenges of the 21st Centur. Journal of EngineeredMaterials (JOM) :14

  • 25. Hassan,B et. al. 2007. The Future of Engineering Education in Malaysia. Department of Institutions of Higher Education Management, Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.


  • 26. Kalaimagal Ramakrishnan & Norizan Mohd Yasin. 2011. Employment issues among Malaysian Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) graduates: A case study. African Journal of Business Management 5(26):10855-10861

  • 27. Mark Winterbotham, et.al., 2007. National employers skills survey 2007: main report. Coventry: Learning and Skills Council

  • 28. Mohd.Sahandri Gani Hamzah & Saifuddin Kumar Abdullah. 2009. Generic Skills in Personnel Development. European Journal of Social Science 11(4):684-689

  • 29. Nguyen Danh Nguyen, Yanagawa Yoshinari and Miyazaki Shigeji, 2005. University education and employment in Japan Students’ perceptions on employment attributes and implications for university education. Emerald Group Publishing Limited 13(3): 202-218.

  • 30. Philip Curry & Rhona Sherry. 2004. The hidden value of higher education learning. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin, Dublin City University & Waterford Institute of Technology


  • 31. Ranjit, S. M. & Wahab, A. B. 2008. Your dream job: How to get it and excel. Kuala Lumpur: TQM Consultants Sdn. Bhd.

  • 32. Sonia, R. 2008. Are foreign graduates better than locals? New Sunday Times. 25 May

  • 33. Sutton. N. 2002. Electronic Sources: Why can’t we all just get along? http:// www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/en/home/News.asp?id=20941[1 April 2012]

  • 34. Hind, D. and Moss, S. 2011. Employability Skills. 2nd Edition. Sunderland, Business Education Publishers.

  • 35. Hillage, J. and Pollard, E., 1998. Employability: Developing a framework for policyanalysis, Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) Research report. no RR85 (London, DfEE).


  • 36. to get it and excel. Stewart, J. and Knowles, V. 2000. Graduate Recruitment and Selection: Implications for HE, Graduates and Small Business Recruiters. Career Development International, 5(2), 65-80.

  • 37. Petrova, P. 2001. Tourism Students Career Expectations and Aspirations: An Examination of Attitudes, Perceptions and Expectations of Current Undergraduate Tourism Students at the University of Luton of Tourism Degrees and Tourism Careers, Unpublished MSc Thesis, Department of Tourism, Leisure and Sport Management. Luton, University of Luton.

  • 38. Gary D. Lock, Kate Bullock, Momna Hejmadi, Virginia Gould. 2009. Exploring the Industrial-Placement Experience for Mechanical Engineering Undergraduates. Journal of Higher Education Academy, 4(1)

  • 39. Lori W. Briel & Elizabeth Evans Getzel. 2001. Internships in Higher Education: Promoting Success for Students with Disabilities. Journal of the Society for Disability Studies, 21(1).


Thank you

Thank you to get it and excel.


ad