ABSTRACT

1. TITLE: IDENTIFY YEAR PERFORMANCE OF PRIMARY TEACHERS BY SELF APPRAISALMs. KALPANA CHAVAN1, DR.SANJEEV SONAWANE2,Mrs.NISHA VALVI31.Assistant professor, Pad.D.Y.Patil College of Education, University ofPune, India (+91 9730559289, Email: kschavan333@yahoo.com) 2. DEAN& H.O.D., Department of Education &Extension, University ofPune, India(+91 9890178190, Email: sonshila@yahoo.com) 3.Assistant professor, Department of Education &Extension, University ofPune, India (+919850831267, Email : nishavalvi@ymail.com) self appraisal of primary teacher

2. ABSTRACT • The modern concepts of management particularly in the area of quality assurance, performance appraisal systems has become more wide spread & intensive .Employee performance not only fair to the individual , institute but it can also help the management in making the optimal use of the latest form within the institute for the development & quality .This study was focusing on year performance of primary teacher by self appraisal.The purpose of this study was to identify the year performance of primary teacher by self appraisal. self appraisal of primary teacher

3. The responses were randomly gathered from 50 primary teachers by using self appraisal rating scales.5 point rating scale was developed by researcher based on self appraisal format of UNIVERSITY GRANT COMMISSION. This rating scale contain 4 parts,1) Academic performance, 2) Co-curricular performance, 3) Innovation/Creativity performance, 4) Extension performance. Five point rating scale was credit based. For analysis of data x2 test was used. self appraisal of primary teacher

4. Result showed that there was a significant result that means year performance of primary teacher about 1) Academic performance, 2) Co-curricular performance, 3) Innovation/Creativity performance was significant at 0.05 level but extension performance was not significant. • Keywords: Self appraisal, 5 point rating scale, Academic performance, Co-curricular performance, Innovation/Creativity performance, Extension performance. self appraisal of primary teacher

5. BACKGROUND:  Performance Appraisal is a powerful tool of Human Resource Development. The modern concepts of management particularly in the area of quality assurance, performance appraisal systems has become more wide spread & intensive .Employee performance not only fair to the individual , institute but it can also help the management in making the optimal use of the latest form within the institute for the development & quality. It is the process which helps identify those who perform their assigned tasks as well & also pinpoints those whose productivity is low. self appraisal of primary teacher

6. factors affecting performance: • 1] Cooperative relationships are very supportive & facilitative in nature are more productive & qualitative • 2] Innovation in practice & support for growth • 3] Fixed, dynamic goals & Clarity of goals • 4] High degree of awareness • 5] Counseling for improvement. This study was focusing on performance of primary teachers. The purpose of this study was to identify the year performance of primary teacher by self appraisal. self appraisal of primary teacher

7. 2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY: • 1] To access the year performance of primary teachers. • 2] To access the 1] Academic performance 2]co curricular performance 3]Innovation & creativity performance 4]Extension performance of primary teachers by self appraisal 3 METHODOLOGIES: 1 ] METHOD: Survey method was used. 2] SAMPLE: 50 primary teachers were randomly selected self appraisal of primary teacher

8. 3] TOOL:Researcher made Performa rating scale, which is BASED on THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDICATORS DEVELOPED BY UNIVERSITY GRANT COMMISSION (INDIA). self appraisal of primary teacher

9. This Performa contain 4 categories, 1] category I is Academic Performance 2] category II is Co curricular Performance 3] category III is Creative and Innovative Performance.4] category IV is Extension Performance. It is score based. Total scores are 360 in that, category I=140 scores, category II=40scores, category III=135 scores, category IV=45 scores. Total performance and all categories are rated in 5 point rating & grades are • 1: POOR, 2: SATISFACTORY, 3: GOOD, • 4: VERY GOOD, 5: OUT STANDING. self appraisal of primary teacher

10. 1] YEAR PERFORMANCE: RATING SCALE=total score=360 RATE GRADE • 1] 0-72 POOR • 2] ABOVE 72-144 SATISFACTORY • 3] ABOVE144-216 GOOD • 4] ABOVE 216-288 VERY GOOD • 5] ABOVE 288-360 OUT STANDING self appraisal of primary teacher

11. 2] ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: SCORE=140 RATE GRADE • 1] 0-28 POOR • 2] ABOVE 28-56 SATISFACTORY • 3] ABOVE56-84 GOOD • 4] ABOVE 84-112 VERY GOOD • 5] ABOVE 112-140 OUT STANDING self appraisal of primary teacher

12. 3] CO CURRICULAR PERFORMANCE: SCORE=40 RATE GRADE • 1] 0-8 POOR • 2] ABOVE 8-16 SATISFACTORY • 3] ABOVE16-24 GOOD • 4] ABOVE 24-32 VERY GOOD • 5] ABOVE 32-40 OUT STANDING self appraisal of primary teacher

13. 4] CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE: SCORE=135 RATE GRADE • 1] 0-27 POOR • 2] ABOVE 27-54 SATISFACTORY • 3] ABOVE 54-81 GOOD • 4] ABOVE 81-108 VERY GOOD • 5] ABOVE 108-135 OUT STANDING self appraisal of primary teacher

14. 5] EXTENSION PERFORMANCE: SCORE=45 RATE GRADE • 1] 0-9 POOR • 2] ABOVE 9-18 SATISFACTORY • 3] ABOVE18-27 GOOD • 4] ABOVE 27-36 VERY GOOD • 5] ABOVE 36-45 OUT STANDING self appraisal of primary teacher

15. 6] ACADEMIC & CO CURRICULAR PERFORMANCE: SCORE=180 RATE GRADE • 1] 0-36 POOR • 2] ABOVE 36-72 SATISFACTORY • 3] ABOVE 72-108 GOOD • 4] ABOVE 108-144 VERY GOOD • 5] ABOVE 144-180 OUT STANDING This rating scale was made by researcher using Likert scaling technique. self appraisal of primary teacher

16. 4] STASTICAL TOOL: X2 Test 5] ANALYSIS OF DATA: • TABLE1: CATEGORY I: ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE • OBSERVATION: Table shows that Academic performance grade was Outstanding • DECISION: Academic performance of primary teachers was Significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

17. TABLE 2: CATEGORY II: CO-CURRICULAR PERFORMANCE • X2 Test was used to decide co-curricular performance of primary teacher was Significant or Not. self appraisal of primary teacher

18. TABLE 3: to decide co-curricular performance were significant or not. (IT IS ON THE BASIS OF EQUAL PROBABILITY). • Calculated X2 =20.6, df=4, significant level =0.01, Table value of X2 =13.277 Calculated X2 » Table value • DECISION: Co-curricular performance of primary teachers was Significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

19. TABLE 4: CATEGORY III: CREATIVE &INNOVATIVE PERFORMANCE • OBSERVATION: Table shows that Creative & innovative performance grade was NIL • DECISION: Creative & innovative performance of primary teachers was Not-Significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

20. TABLE 5: CATEGORY IV: EXTENSION PERFORMANCE • OBSERVATION: Table shows that extension performance grade was NIL • DECISION: Extension performance of primary teachers was Not-Significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

21. TABLE 6: CATEGORY I & CATEGORY II: ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE & CO-CURRICULAR PERFORMANCE • OBSERVATION: Table shows that Academic with Co-curricular performance grade was OUT STANDING & VERY GOOD. • DECISION: Academic with Co-curricular performance of primary teachers was Significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

22. TABLE 7: YEAR PERFORMANCE OF PRIMARY TEACHERS: • X2 Test was used to decide YEAR performance were significant or not. self appraisal of primary teacher

23. TABLE 8: to decide YEAR performance were significant or not. (IT IS ON THE BASIS OF EQUAL PROBABILITY). • Calculated X2 =75, df=4, significant level =0.01, Table value of X2 =13.277 Calculated X2 »Table value • DECISION: Year performance of primary teachers was significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

24. 4 CONCLUSIONS: • 1] Year performance of primary teachers was Significant, Grade was Satisfactory & Good. • 2] Academic Year performance of primary teachers was Significant & grade was Outstanding. • 3] Co-curricular Year performance of primary teachers was Significant & grades were Satisfactory, Good & very good. self appraisal of primary teacher

25. 4 CONCLUSIONS: • 4] Creative & Innovative Year performance of primary teachers was Not-Significant. • 5] Extension performance of primary teachers was Not-Significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

26. 5 DISCUSSIONS ABOUT CONCLUSIONS: • Year performance of primary teachers was significant, Grade was Satisfactory & Good but it was not an outstanding, it is because of Creative, innovative & extension performance. In innovative & creative performance activities are related to research. Actually in practice it was excluded by teachers. But in Maharashtra State D.Ed (Primary teacher training) syllabus already included theory & project related to action research. self appraisal of primary teacher

27. 5 DISCUSSIONS ABOUT CONCLUSIONS: • So Schools should motivate the teachers to conduct action research, research based publications, paper presentations etc.Because of this they know new trends of educations, new techniques, new Teaching-learning strategies etc.Extension performance included leadership & administrative related activities. Extension performance of primary teachers was Not-Significant. self appraisal of primary teacher

28. 5 DISCUSSIONS ABOUT CONCLUSIONS: • So Schools should gives opportunities related to decision making, leadership and participation in administrations. This practice makes outstanding Creative, Innovative & Extension performance. The conclusions of the present study came due to its characteristics as well as its differentials so; the conclusions should be accepted at experimental level. self appraisal of primary teacher

29. SELECTED REFERENCES • Ahmed, Shakeel (2007).Human Resource Development in Universities, New Age International Publishers. • Kothari, C, R. (2009). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques, Delhi: New Age International Publishers • Performa for University /College Teachers Based On The Academic Performance Indicators (API)Developed by UGC(INDIA). self appraisal of primary teacher