information society technologies ist ka1 systems and services for the citizen
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Information Society Technologies (IST) KA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 75

Information Society Technologies (IST) KA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 114 Views
  • Uploaded on

Information Society Technologies (IST) KA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen. 6th Call, Information Day - Friday 2nd February, 2001 GENERAL INFORMATION. DG Information Society European Commission. M. Richonnier. IST -KA1 - Info Day - 02.02.2001. DISCLAIMER

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Information Society Technologies (IST) KA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen' - susane


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
information society technologies ist ka1 systems and services for the citizen

Information Society Technologies (IST)KA1 Systems and Services for the Citizen

6th Call, Information Day - Friday 2nd February, 2001

GENERAL INFORMATION

DG Information Society

European Commission

M. Richonnier

ist ka1 info day 02 02 2001
IST -KA1 - Info Day - 02.02.2001

DISCLAIMER

Aspects of these presentations interpret legal documents.

It is the legal documents and not the presentations that are legally binding.

M. Richonnier

objectives of the information day
Objectives of the Information Day
  • To help you make a better proposal
  • To receive quality proposals
  • To answer any questions
  • To allow you to network
  • The slides will be on Cordis
  • The participants list will be published on Cordis (if no objections)

M. Richonnier

agenda morning
Agenda: Morning
  • 09h15 – 09h45 Objectives/focus of 6th Call- M. Richonnier
  • 09h45 – 10h05 Preparing a Proposal - W. Van Puymbroeck
  • 10h05 - 10h25 Overview of areas

HEALTH - J-C Healy

PERSONS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS - H. Haglund

ADMINISTRATIONS - G. Santucci

  • 10h25 - 10H40Presentation of Protool - A. Burgueno
  • 10h40 – 11h00 Questions and Answers
  • 11h00 - 11h30 Coffee Break + move to parallel sessions
  • 11h30 – 13h00 Parallel sessions by area

M. Richonnier

agenda afternoon
Agenda: Afternoon
  • 13h00 - 14h00 Lunch
  • 14h00 - 16h30 Ad-Hoc meetings by area

* Partnering, marriage brokerage..

* Discussions with Commission staff

* ...

  • 16h30 - 17h00 Parallel sessions by area

* Final discussion

M. Richonnier

vision of the ist programme
Vision of the IST programme

”Create an ambient intelligence landscape(for seamless delivery of services and applications)in Europe relying also upon testbeds andopen source software, develop user-friendliness,and develop and converge the networking infrastructure in Europe to world-class"

http://www.cordis.lu/ist/istag.htm

M. Richonnier

vision of the ist ka1 ambient intelligence
Vision of the IST - KA1“Ambient intelligence”
  • Beyond “ the screen and keyboard interface”
  • A knowledge society for ALL
  • “Our surrounding is the interface” to IST applications and services
  • Multi-sensorial interfaces supported by computing and networking:
    • everywhere
    • in everyday objects
    • offering natural interactions (voice, gesture etc.)

M. Richonnier

ist ka1 r d paradigms
IST KA1 R&D paradigms
  • From data telematics (3rd FP) to multi-media telematics (4th FP) to ambient intelligence (5th FP)
  • Ambient intelligence = ubiquitous computing + ubiquitous communication + intelligent interfaces which will allow...
  • The realisation of innovative,user-friendly, intelligent and communicating application systems that will improvedelivery of services to users.

M. Richonnier

reminder on ist
Reminder on IST
  • Visible part of integration: Cross Programme Actions and Integrated Application Platforms (12% of budget) = “the tip of the iceberg”
  • Application R&D (+/- 50% of the budget) combines both technology research and system integration
  • Genuine industrial participation with a view to exploitation of results

M. Richonnier

key action 1 objectives
Key Action 1: Objectives
  • Exploit the potential offered by progress in “ambient intelligence” through RTD in new application systems for making general interest services user-friendly, dependable, cost-effective and interoperable.

 improve competitiveness & meet user demands

M. Richonnier

key action 1 aim
Key Action 1:Aim

1. Innovativeapplication systems, i.e. systems that will be new at the end of the project

2. That have significant exploitation potential

Innovative integration

- progress wrt state of the art

New IST components

M. Richonnier

key action 1 focus
Key Action 1:Focus
  • Improving impact:
    • Critical mass:
      • Open to larger projects - no “one size fits all”
    • Concentration on strategic issues
  • Focus on the vision of “ambient intelligence”
  • Fostering longer-term and/or high-risk effort
  • Reinforcing the eEurope momentum beyond 2002

M. Richonnier

key action 1 in call 6 first call in 2001
Key Action 1 in Call 6(First call in 2001)
  • Open: January 27, 2001
  • Deadline: April 25, 2001
    • do not wait until the last minute!
    • pre-register your proposal!
  • Evaluation: 13 -19 May 2001
  • Evaluation Summary Reports: before May 30
  • Negotiation: June - July (one month if good “technical Annex” / good consortium!)
  • Signature: September for first contract to start on October 1st

M. Richonnier

key action 1 in call 6 indicative budget range
KEY Action 1 in Call 6 (indicative budget range )
  • Health 30 -35 MEuro

(including +/- 5 MEurofor best practice and trials)

  • Persons with Special Needs 17 - 20 MEuro
  • Administrations 3 - 5 MEuro

(Best Practice and Trials only)

TOTAL 55 MEuro

M. Richonnier

slide15

KEY Action 1:Our goals

GOAL 1

Attract RTD proposals with critical mass, strategic impact and real economic value, e.g. an average EU funding

of 2.0 M€

M. Richonnier

slide16

KEY Action 1:Our goals

GOAL 2

Attract Consortia that are manageable and where all partners have a clear role and a significant task in contribution, e.g.:

  • Consortia of not more than 6 partners is ideal
  • No partner with microscopic input (such as 15000 € per year!)

M. Richonnier

slide17

KEY Action 1:Our goals

GOAL 3

In order to avoid cost on your and our side, only high quality proposals should be submitted, e.g.:

  • Over-subscription not more than a factor of 4

M. Richonnier

ka1 cluster management
KA1: Cluster management
  • Health
    • Intelligent systems for the citizen (open)
    • Intelligent systems for the patient (open)
    • Intelligent systems for the Healthcare professional (open)
  • Persons with Special Needs
    • Intelligent assistive systems (open)
    • Intelligent systems for independent living (open)
  • Administrations
    • e-democracy
    • smart government (Take-up open)

M. Richonnier

ka1 cluster management1
KA1: Cluster Management

Make sure your proposal

  • fits well with the open clusters
  • does not duplicate existing projects

(Look at Cordis!)

M. Richonnier

ka1 6th call
KA1: 6th Call

GOOD LUCK!

M. Richonnier

slide22

Proposal Preparation

  • Call for Proposals & Eligibility
  • Guide for Proposals & Evaluation Criteria
  • Feedback from previous Evaluations
  • Some further opportunities
  • Final concluding remarks

W. Van Puymbroeck

slide23

Call for Proposers and Eligibility

    • Call for Proposals published on 27th January It defines:
    • the Action Lines that are open
      • Reference to the Workprogramme 2001
    • the Type of Actions called for
      • See Guide for Proposers
    • the deadline and method of delivery of a proposal
    • refers toManual of Proposal Evaluation Procedures
  • Proposals have to be in Brussels

on 25 April 2001 before 17:00

slide24

Guide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria

  • A proposal has 3 parts:
    • Part A: Administrative, budgetary information (Forms A0-A4)
    • Part B: Description of contribution to scientific/technical objectives and workplan
    • Part C: Description of EC policies, Economic development, management and participants
  • There are 5 blocks of Evaluation Criteria:
    • Scientific/technological quality and innovation
    • Community added value and contribution to EC policies
    • Contribution to Community social objectives
    • Economic development and S&T prospects
    • Resources, Partnership and management
slide25

Guide for Proposers -Evaluation Criteria

Cont’d

Evaluation Criteria 1

Scientific Technological

quality and innovation

Part B of Proposal

  • B1 Title page
  • B2 Content list
  • B3 Objectives B4 Contribution to programme Key Action objectives
  • B5 Innovation
  • B6 Project Workplan

For RTD proposals this part

needs to be anonymous

(incl. Workpackage list, deliverables list, workpackage description)

slide26

Guide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria Cont’d

Part C of Proposal

C1 Title page

C2 Content list

C3 Community added value and contribution to EC policies

C4 Contribution to Community social objectives

Evaluation Criteria 2

Community added value and contribution to EC policies

Evaluation Criteria 3

Contribution to Community social objectives

slide27

Guide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria

Cont’d

Part C of Proposal cont’d

C5 Project management

C6 Description of the consortium

C7 Description of the participants

C8 Economic development and scientific and technological prospects

Evaluation Criteria 5

Resources, partnership and management

Evaluation Criteria 4

Economic development and S&T prospects

guide for proposers evaluation criteria
Guide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria

CriteriaWeight(1)Threshold(2)

Scientific/Technological Qualityand innovation 4>= 3

Community Added Valueand contribution to EU policy 1>= 2

Contribution to Comm. Social objectives 1-

Economic Dev; S&T prospects(range of applications, exploitation, strategic impact, dissemination)2>= 3

Resources, Partnership, Management 2>= 2

1) Weight on a scale of 10 (sum 10)

2) Threshold with respect to score 0-5

For RTD

guide for proposers evaluation criteria1
Guide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluation criterion 1:

Scientific/Technological quality and innovation (for RTD)

  • Quality
  • Innovation and risk
  • Adequacy
  • Evaluation criterion 2:

Community added value and contribution to EC policies (for RTD)

  • European Dimension of the problem
  • European Added Value
  • EU policy
guide for proposers evaluation criteria2
Guide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluation criterion 3:

Contribution to Community social objectives (for RTD)

  • Quality of Life and Health and Safety
  • Employment
  • Preserving and/or enhancing the environment
  • Evaluation criterion 4:

Economic development and S & T prospects (for RTD)

  • Usefulness and range of applications, exploitations plans
  • Strategic impact
  • Dissemination strategies
guide for proposers evaluation criteria3
Guide for Proposers - Evaluation Criteria
  • Evaluation criterion 5:

Management and resources (for RTD)

    • Quality of management and project approach
    • Quality of partnership, involvement of users and other actors
    • Appropriateness of resources
guide for proposers audit certificates
Guide for Proposers:Audit certificates
  • NEW!
  • Only RTD i.e. research, demonstration and combined research and demonstration projects
  • When the contract has
    • A cost of more than 250 000 Euros for the first 12 month period of the project, the audit certificate to be provided with first interim cost statement
    • A total project cost exceeding 250 000 Euros for the final consolidated cost statement, the audit certificate to be provided together with the final consolidated cost statement, also for those that have provided audit certificates with their first interim cost statement
  • Eligible costs
    • Community financial contribution shall not exceed 4000 Euros per audit certificate
some evaluation feedback
Some Evaluation Feedback
  • Evaluators consider all aspects of the proposal and have different backgrounds
    • Experts in IST, knowledgeable in application area, understand business issues
  • Proposers have to make convincing case of innovation and present very clear objectives
    • Your strategic objectives matter most
  • Proposal has to be realistic and “exciting” at the same time
  • Make the case for Community funding
    • i.e. both European level and need for public money
some evaluation feedback1
Some Evaluation Feedback
  • All partners must have a clear role and the consortium has to reach “critical mass”
    • importance of “Consortium engineering”
  • Carefully consider “release” level of deliverables
    • note e.g. the objective to foster the development and use of open source software
  • Management has to consider all issues e.g.
    • risk management
    • handling of conflict
    • communication strategy
some evaluation feedback2
Some Evaluation Feedback
  • The proposal may not have a weak point
    • thresholds and weighting
    • each evaluation criteria discussed on its own merits
  • Avoid easy criticism
    • ask colleagues to critique early versions
  • Proposals which are “incontournable” have up to now always been funded
  • Evaluators evaluate what is written, not what is in your mind
  • Evaluators look more for content than style
further opportunities al viii 1 6 proposals for extension with nas partners
Further opportunities:(AL VIII.1.6)Proposals for extension with NAS partners
  • NEW!
  • All IST project types can be extended
  • New WP’s or inclusion in existing WP’s
  • Extension should be useful: minimum 1 year
  • New partners/work should add value
  • Submitted by co-ordinator of existing project together with all existing and new NAS partners
  • Large majority of extension budget to new NAS partners
  • Include existing Annex I
  • Proposals indicate VIII.1.6 and AL of existing project
  • Extension proposal will be evaluated as a new proposal
  • Only projects can be extended - not actions in negotiation!
  • Implemented through contract amendment
  • Appendix in Guide for Proposers
further opportunities the european ist prize
Further opportunities: The European IST prize
  • The most distinguished prize for innovative products in the field of information technology
  • 20 Winner Prizes of each 5000 Euros each, 3 grand prizes of 200 000 Euros each.

Total amount awarded:700 000 Euros

  • Benefits: public recognition, widespread PR, enhancement of the visibility, credibility and the prospects of the Winner companies
  • Open to 31 countries
  • Deadline for applications: 15 May 2001

More info: www.it-prize.org

further opportunities cpa s focus
Further opportunities: CPA’s - focus
  • Address topics common to several Key Actions
    • Themes of strategic nature
    • Bringing together fragmented areas
    • Supporting aspects of integration and convergence
  • Provide an addition perspective to proposers
  • Defined by Action Lines in the Workprogramme
    • Section 5 of the Workprogramme
  • Resources available … +/- 12% of the IST budget
further opportunities cpa s action lines
Further opportunities: CPA’s - Action Lines

Not all open this Call!

  • Home environments
  • Multi-sensorial, multi-modal and multilingual interaction
  • GIS
  • Dependability
  • Smart Cards
  • Next Generation Networking
  • Socio-economic impact and indicators
  • eLearning for youth in the digital age
  • Grid computing and challenging applications
  • Regional pilot actions and demonstrations for the new economy
  • Nanotechnology and applications in health, environment, …
  • Applications Service Provision
  • Advanced Digital Signal Processing and applications
final concluding remarks
Final concluding remarks

What is new at the

end of the project?

Importance of innovation

Consortia composition

Exploitationpotential

European and beyond

Project 100% in line

with business interest

important details keep up to date
Important details - keep up to date !

http://www.cordis.lu/ist/

IST helpdesk

Fax : +32 2 296 83 88

E-Mail : [email protected]

- Official Journal (call text)

- Workprogramme

- Guide for Proposers

- Evaluation manual

final concluding remarks1
Final concluding remarks
  • In order to help us,
    • please pre-register your proposal
    • please submit the full proposal in good time and ensure all forms are duly completed and signed
    • ensure that budget figures add up
    • use Pro-Tool
    • if available use your registration number with the IST Programme
announcements
Announcements
  • Area meetings (starting at 11:30):

- Health S3

- Persons with Special Needs S4

- Administrations S1

  • Please do not forget to return the participant questionnaire to Commission staff at the end of the Information Day

Many thanks

5 th framework programme 1998 2002 information society technologies
5th Framework Programme (1998 - 2002) Information Society Technologies

Key Action 1: Systems and Services for the Citizen Applications Relating to Health

Jean-Claude Healy , Head of Unit

health domain area overview
Health domain: Area Overview
  • Vision
  • Scope of the Call
  • Overview of the rationale
  • Results from previous calls
  • Key messages
vision continuity of care
Vision(Continuity of Care)

Integrated intelligent citizen-centered health delivery system that contributes to the improvement of quality, access, and efficiency of healthcare

slide48

Applications Relating to Health : Rationale Overview

1:CITIZENS SOCIETAL DEMAND: “Stay HEALTHY”

2:PATIENTS

SOCIETAL DEMAND: “ Safe, cheap, efficient, follow-up & treatment”

2.1:homecare

SPECIFIC DEMANDS:best hometreatment

1.1:health supportservices

SPECIFIC DEMANDS:- health promotions- support to health-related industries

1.2:health

appliances

SPECIFIC DEMANDS: at home, at work,abroad, at leisure, ensure the citizen can manage his own health

2.2:worldwidetelemedicineSPECIFIC DEMANDS: 1st medical advice

2nd medical opinion

Info - Ethics

e-EUROPE

3.1:hc providers

SPECIFIC DEMANDS:

- quality - integration- user friendliness- more mobility

3.2:hc managers

SPECIFIC DEMANDS:

- effectiveness- hc policies- resource management

4:INDUSTRIAL AFFAIRS

- standards

- implementation plans - certification centre

3: HC PROFESSIONALS

SOCIETAL DEMAND:

“optimisation of human, financial & infrastructure resources”

JCH/FL/II/FV - fl-5ftpflower-0f-2-fonce..ppt - 01/03/00 page 1/4

scope of the call
Scope of the Call

Action line I.1.1 Intelligent environment for citizencentered health management

Action line I.1.2 Intelligent collaborative environments supporting continuity of care

Action line I.1.3 Best practice and trials in e-Health

results from previous calls
Results from previous calls

From the 1st Call to the 6th Call

  • Results of Calls: Proposals received and selected
  • Clustered Approach
  • Coverage of the WorkPlan: Need for reinforcement of citizen cluster
  • eEurope Initiative/eHealth Action Plan
slide51

5TH FP: 1998-2002 - IST Programme

KA1 - APPLICATIONS RELATING TO HEALTH

key messages
Key Messages
  • Highly innovative projects (integration, components, application) leading to tangible results (pre-products)

Improve competitiveness of the European Health Telematics Industry

  • Promote the uptake of e-Health services
  • Support to EU policies
health applications web site
Health Applications Web-site

www.cordis.lu/ist/ka1/health/home.html

key action 1 persons with special needs including the disabled and the elderly

Information Society Technologies (IST)

Key Action 1Persons with special needs, including the disabled and the elderly

Mr. Karl Henry HaglundHead of Unit

DG Information Society

European Commission

IST Information Day 2 February 2001

5 th framework programme 1998 2002 information society technologies1

5th Framework Programme (1998 - 2002) Information Society Technologies

DISCLAIMER

Aspects of these presentations interpret

legal documents

It is the legal documents and not the presentations that are legally binding

DG Information Society

European Commission

slide56

Disabled and Elderly: Area Overview

Henry Haglund, Head of Unit,

  • Vision
  • Scope of the Call
  • Results from previous calls
  • Key messages
disabled and elderly scope of the call
Disabled and Elderly:Scope of the Call

IST2001.I.2.1 Intelligent assistive systems for social inclusion

Objectives:To improve IST-based application systems offering new possibilities for full participation in society, including work opportunities by all persons with special needs.

Types of actions addressed:Research and Development, Demonstration and Combined projects

Links with WP2000:Adaptation of Action Line IST 2000 - I.2.1

6th ist call
6th IST Call
  • I.2.1 Intelligent assistive systems for social inclusion:
  • Focus:
  • “Senior-friendly” applications providing convenient access to services for independent living
  • Intelligent IST-based systems which can support the integration of disabled or disadvantaged persons in the workplace
cross programme themes
Cross programme themes
  • 6th IST Call - RTD, Take-up and Support Measures
  • IST 2001 - V.1.1 CPA1 Home Environments (RTD only)
  • IST 2001 - V.1.5 CPA5 Smart Cards
results of previous calls
Results of previous calls

5FP Action Lines, projects and funding:

IST-1999-I.3.1 Independent Living

IST-2000-I.2.1 Intelligent assistive systems & interfaces

IST-1999-CPA3 Design-for-All

Projects Cost EC fundingIndependent Living 14 39.1 M€ 23.7 M€

Assistive Systems 6 14.2 M€ 9.9 M€

Design-for-All (incl. 2 AMs) 3 3.5 M€ 2.9 M€

Accompanying Measure 1 1.5 M€ 1.5 M€

Total 24

59 M€

38 M€

(Approx. figures)

disabled and elderly key messages
Disabled and Elderly: Key Messages
  • Innovative, intelligent systems for social inclusion
  • Industrial involvement, market development
  • In-depth user involvement
  • Well-developed and realistic exploitation plans
  • Supporting EU policy, eEurope
ist ka1 information day

IST KA1 Information Day

Key Action 1Administrations

Action Line I.3.2

Friday 2nd February, 2001

which aims
Which aims?

Objectives:

  • dissemination, early exploitation and adoption
  • administrations in the EU and associated states

Focus:

  • adoption/deployment of up-to-date technologies and systems
  • upgrading and extension of existing systems
who is concerned
Who is concerned?
  • Telematics Applications Programme (TAP/FP4) projects
  • Successfully completed
  • Support public administrations
policy objectives
Policy objectives
  • Research results into practice
  • Accelerated uptake of ICT innovation
  • Impact of eEurope on other EU policies
  • Supporting EU Enlargement
  • Fostering SME take-up of new digital technologies
overview of tap sectors
Overview of TAP sectors...

… with main impact on Public Administrations

Telematics for Services of Public Interest

  • Administrations
  • Transport

Telematics for Improving Employment and Quality of Life

  • Telematics for Urban and Rural Areas
  • Telematics for Healthcare
  • Telematics for Disabled and Elderly People
  • Telematics for the Environment
scope of call for proposals
Scope of Call for Proposals
  • Indicative budget: 3 M EUR
  • Limitations imposed by budget
    • Significant relevance to and measurable impact on eEurope Action Plan 2002
    • Involvement of Accession candidate countries
    • Critical number of sites (EU added value)
    • Industrial involvement (SMEs)
commission expectations
Commission expectations
  • Put research results into practice
  • Test and demonstrate value of research
  • Extend results’ benefits to candidate countries
  • Gain experience for future actions
slide69

Electronic preparation and submission of FP5 proposals

Augusto Burgueño ArjonaEC Information Society DG

[email protected]

slide70

Contents

  • 3 alternative ways to prepare and submit a proposal
  • Electronic submission process
  • Trends in electronic submission
  • Future actions
  • How to get started
slide71

3 alternative ways to prepare and submit a proposal

  • Participants download the forms in PDF format and fill them in by hand or using PDF Writer.The proposal has to be submitted on paper.
  • Participants download and install PROTOOL, fill in the data, print out the filled-in forms, and submit the proposal on paper.
  • Participants download and install PROTOOL, fill in the data, request an Electronic Certificate and submit the proposal electronically.
slide74

Future actions

  • Mandatory presentation of the electronic submission system
  • All Commission documentation presents the electronic submission as the preferred option
  • A strengthening of collaboration with the National Contact Points
  • Training on ProTool for the Project Officers (POs)
  • Reinforcement of the ProTool Helpdesk
  • Ensure evolutionary maintenance
  • Launch a study to review existing work and to propose future strategy
slide75

How to get started

  • Read the tutorial
  • http://www.cordis.lu/fp5/protool/tutorial
  • Install ProTool and request a certificate
  • http://www.fp5-csp.org
  • Contact the helpdesks
ad