1 / 11

Neutrinos and TeV photons from Soft Gamma Repeater giant flares

Neutrinos and TeV photons from Soft Gamma Repeater giant flares. Francis Halzen, Hagar Landsman, Teresa Montaruli astro-ph/0503348. Neutrino telescopes can be used as TeV g detectors for short time scale events using m s from p photoproduction in g showers !

susan
Download Presentation

Neutrinos and TeV photons from Soft Gamma Repeater giant flares

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutrinos and TeV photons from Soft Gamma Repeater giant flares Francis Halzen, Hagar Landsman, Teresa Montaruli astro-ph/0503348 Neutrino telescopes can be used as TeV g detectors for short time scale events using ms from p photoproduction in g showers ! Can AMANDA detect a signal from 27 Dec. giant flare from SGR 1806-20 (above horizon)? In what channels? • Review soft-g and X-ray observations on SGR giant flares • A toy model based on Beppo-SAX SGR 1900-14 spectrum • Muon and Neutrino signals • Backgrounds • Useful information for the blind data analysis LBL, IceCube Meeting, Mar. 2005

  2. What are SGR’s? • X-ray stars emitting short (~100 ms) bursts in X/soft g-ray typically of energy 1041 D102 ergs • Steady X-ray emission with luminosities 1035-1036 D102 erg/s with OTTB+power law spectra E-(13) • From slow down rate of steady emission period (5-8 s) huge magnetic fields B ~1014-1015 G • Similar to 8 Anomalous X-ray Pulsars but typically these do not emit bursts (1 exception) • 5 galactic except for SGR 0526-66 in LMC http://solomon.as.utexas.edu/magnetar.html Woods & Thompson, astro-ph/0406133

  3. Steady X-ray emission powered by decay of n star magnetic field Luminosities 1035-1036 D102 erg/s periodic (5-8 s) Neutrinos: Zhang et al ApJ 595 (2003) the potential drop through the magnetosphere of the rotating n star might accelerate protons above photomeson threshold (depends on n star period and B and geometrical factor)  interaction on thermal radiation from heated n star surface The Magnetar Model and n emission dN/dE E-2 Rates strongly depend on beaming angle around polar axis

  4. Why giant flares? • Dec. 27, 2004 peak lasting 0.25 s followed by a 300 s long tail with 7.57 s • period and -140 s precursor (INTEGRAL, GCN2920) following previous series of bursts: Dec 21 and Oct 5. Still active. • 3 ‘giant’ flares: VERY HARD component dN/dE  E-1.5-1.7(Cheng et al., Nature 1996) Rearrangements of magnetic field and formation and dissipation of strong localized currents. These may fracture the rigid crust that outbursts Can be a process in which nucleons and nuclei are accelerated Similar to small GRB’s:SGR giant flares are 106-7 less intense but d21010 Detected radio afterglows imply relativistic outflows + huge luminosities with barion loading fireball (Piran et al, astro-ph0502148, Ioka et al, astro-ph/0503279)

  5. No spectral measurement of the 1st s available. X-ray detectors suffered saturation effects. SGR 1900+14AMANDA B-10 Beppo-SAX: Spectrum for first 68s up to 700keV (1s resolution) SGR 1806-20AMANDA-II (critical period)  No spectrum available. Similar flare. >2 orders of magnitude stronger GEOTAIL (astro-ph/0502315) not saturated: measured fluence implies for d = 15 kpc a very efficient mechanism that releases ~1047 erg in 600 ms Giant flare energy

  6. The SGR 1900-14 Aug 27, 1998 giant outburst A)0-67 sec 70-650 keV OTTB+PL E-1 exp(-E/31.2 keV)+E-1.47 B) 68-195 sec 70-400 keV OTTB E-1 exp(-E/34.2 keV) + E-4.5 C) 196-323 sec 70-400 keV OTTB E-1 exp(-E/28.9 keV) E-1.47 Beppo-Sax (Feroci et al, 1999) Guidorzi et al, 2004: response function of GRBM was not well known at large off-axis angles  70-600 keV only and 10% sys error

  7. New best fit accounts better for the <60 keV region but for HE we use negative power law and vary it to account for the errors Spectrum Extrapolation at TeV energies OTTB+PL fits Guidorzi private communication

  8. g spectra At South Pole: d =-20˚  q = 70˚ Muons from Gammas • energy to produce m of energy E Competition of pion interaction and decay in the atmosphere (Drees Halzen Hikasa, PRD39, 1989, Stanev Gaisser Halzen PRD32 1985): Pion photoproduction cross section in FLUKA Em,th = 10 GeV AMANDA-II horizontal averaged area = 30000 m2 and 0.3 s

  9. 1 Hz in 82 deg2 and 0.3 s at 5 km depth 6 0.8 Muon signal astro-ph/0110513 Gamma showers in MILAGRO But this particular flare was at 68˚ and Milagro analyses are commonly performed up to 45˚

  10. Upward-going muons and cascades in AMANDA For a source below horizon as SGR1900+14 But also horizontal muons from neutrinos but 1/ 2.65

  11. Conclusions • We calculated possible muon and neutrino rates for Dec 27 giant flare as a function of spectrum. AMANDA can constrain it ! • Relevant time scale of the order of 0.1 s and spatial constraint allow a search using downgoing muons • We should use the neutrino cascade channel and look for neutrino induced muons • We will preferably use IceTray or SIEGLINDE • Start from raw data -> ROOT files

More Related