1 / 21

The Detector Chapter of T he Detector Concept Report

The Detector Chapter of T he Detector Concept Report. 学術創成定例月会議 ８月７日　 宮本彰也. The RDR and DCR. DCR is associated with the RDR: Due end of 2006 Detector Concept Report consists of Physics section : ~50 Pages

sonya-beck
Download Presentation

The Detector Chapter of T he Detector Concept Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Detector Chapter of The Detector Concept Report 学術創成定例月会議 ８月７日　 宮本彰也 Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  2. The RDR and DCR • DCR is associated with the RDR: Due end of 2006 • Detector Concept Report consists of • Physics section : ~50 Pages • Editors: Klaus Moening, Yasuhiro Okada, Joe Lykken, Mark Oreglia, Satoru Yamashita, Adbelhak Djouadi • Wiki page: http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/ • Detector section: ~150 pages • Editors: Ties Behnke, C.J.S.Damerell, John Jaros, A.M. • DCR is for Non-ILC HEP researchers/beginners • Executive summary • Executive summaries of RDR+DCR physics + DCR detector  Executive Summary with a help of communication experts Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  3. The Detector Section • Based on four DOD's and input from experts • Prepared by 4 editors + authors to be enlisted • Goal of the detector chapter: To demonstrate that • Detectors which can do the ILC physics are within reach • Several detector concepts are being pursued • Advances in detector technology are needed • The case for detector and concept R&D are made • A good plan for the needed detector R&D exists;additional support is required • We have some understanding of detector costs • There is a strong case for 2IRs and 2 detectors • The world wide ILC experimentalists are united to produce this document. Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  4. Activities of the Detector Editors • Bangalore, LCWS2006. • Detector editor met for the first time and exchanged initial idea • Met with physics editor • Version 1 was presented at LCWS2006 • Joined WWS phone meetings in April and June to discuss the DCR. • Held phone meetings: 29 June & 6 July, and discussed the outline of the detector part • Phone meeting with physics editors on 13 July • Version 2 presented at VLCW06 • Met GDE EC during VLCW06 • DCR Detector Wiki page preparedhttp://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/ Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  5. The Outline of the Detector Chapter • General Introduction • Challenges for Detector Design and Technology • Introduction to the Detector Concepts • MDI Issues • Subsystem Designs and Technologies • Sub-Detector Performance • Integrated Physics Performance • Why We need 2IRs and 2 Detectors • Detector Costs • Future Options • Next Step • Conclusion Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  6. 1. General Introduction • 3-5 pages, by Editors • To describe • A brief description of the ILC Physics. Physics target of ILC detectors. • Baseline physics at 200-500 GeV • Extendability to 1TeV and/or optional running of gg/ge, Zpole, W threshold etc. • The functionality that an ILC detector should have: • Tracking, vertexing, calorimetry, hermeticity, background consideration, trigger • Organization of this document Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  7. 2. Challenge for Detector Design and Technology • 10-15 pages: by Editors + experts • To describe: • The needs for the detector performance • Jet energy resolution: Required lum. vs resolution. • Process: ZH, ZHH, SUSY, WW/ZZ. Resol. vs Lum • Momentum resolution: • Recoil mass of ZH llX : • Vertexing at ILC • H ccbar : • Luminosity, Energy, and Polarization measurements • The usual suspects at ILC: • Lepton ID, hermeticity, solid angle coverage • Experts work is essential: show results to each other and agree on results Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  8. 3. Introduction to the Detector Concepts • By Concept Coordinators, ~5 pages per concept • Describe • Concept of concept teams: Concept teams are not collaborations. • Motivation, rationale, design overview, performance goals of LDC, GLD, SiD, 4th Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  9. 4. MDI Issues • By MDI panel, together with concept experts: 10-15 pages • Describe the ILC environment, Backgrounds, and the Machine Detector Interface, such as • Timing and bunch structure, impact on design • Background evaluation, Robustness and timing requirements. • Describe based on the base line configuration of 2mrad and 20 mrad. And show that detectors can work with this configuration. • Description of other configurations such as 14 mrad, etc, are described as options 2mrad/20mrad  14mrad/14mrad if the base line is changed. We nee new inputs for 14mrad case Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  10. 5. Subsystem designs and technologies • By R&D panel + editors • Describe how each subsystem looks like, what kind of technologies exists for them, technological challenges, and required R&D to achieve goals. • Anticipated Subsystems and page length • BeamCAL (~3page) • Vertex Detector (~7pages) • Tracking: TPC/Si Hybrid(~5 pages), Si Monolithic (~5pages) • Calorimetry: Ecal&Hcal ; describe major technologies and concepts (15~20pages) • Solenoids(~ 5pages) • Muon System(~5 pages) • LEP(~5pages) • Electronics and DAQ(~5pages) Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  11. 6. Sub-Detector performance • 10-15 pages: by Editors with Concept Reps. • Based on results from Concepts and other studies Pickup typical results • Describe typical performances such as • Tracking performance: efficiency, purity, solid angle coverage, momentum resolution • PFA performance • Vertexing performance • Lepton ID • Results should be based on FULL MC. New work is required. Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  12. 7. Physics Performance • ~ 10 pages: by Editors + Concept Reps/Experts. • Fast MC result will be in physics part • Show results based on full MC • To support results by fast MC • New work is needed / contributions are highly welcomedWe will incorporate as many new results as possibleWe need them soon • At least, we will show that • There are efforts to study physics performances based on full simulation • Some preliminary results on some process supports arguments in physics part Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  13. 8. Why we need 2 IRs and 2 Detectors • 3-5 pages : By 2IR task force • Based on document at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0508141/proc/papers/PLEN0059.PDF • New arguments are welcomed Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  14. 9. Detector Costs • ~5 pages : WWS Costing panel + WWSOC • Describes • Methodology: Be consistent with the Acc. Costing • Based on the information from the concepts • "Average" costs Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  15. 10. Future Options • 5-10 pages: Editors with inputs from experts • Describe • Overview of option physics • Detectors are optimized for e+e- physics, but will be modified if LC500 and/or LHC results motivate to go for option physics. • Needed changes to detectors, and needed R&D Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  16. 11. Next Step • 5 pages : Editors + WWSOC • Describe • Steps toward detector TDR  Need discussion in WWSOC • Plan after DCR; • Detector optimization: better understanding of detector performance based on full simulations. • Subsystem R&D : Proposed detector subsystem technologies have to be confirmed by R&D. • Plans of concept teams… Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  17. 12. Conclusion • 2-4 pages: by Editors • Conclusion would be • Based on detector concepts, we showed that detectors which can do the ILC physics are within our reach • The case are made for the detector concept R&D and technology R&D. • We have some understanding of detector costs • There is a strong case for 2IRs and 2 detectors Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  18. Time line to prepare the detector chapter • Time line: • At Vancouver: • Propose the outline • Authors are nominated/selected • By End of September • First draft including major part of figures collected. • Some figures will be preliminary • By End of October=ECFA meeting at Valencia • Combine drafts, make a balance, editing • By End of November • Get feedback from community • By end of 2006: • Shape up and complete DCR Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  19. Implication to Gakujyutsu Sousei • DCR Detector will be an important document to show • The case of the ILC physics • The case of the ILC detectors • DCR subjects considerably overlap with Gakujyutsu Sousei subjects • In parallel to the activities in GLD/LDC/SiD, many Japanese contributions to DCR are highly welcomed Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  20. Expected Gakujyutsu Sousei Contribution • 2. Challenges for detector designs and technologies • What defines a goal of detector performance. (Yamashita san) • 4. MDI Issues • Can detector work with 14mrad Xing ? (Yamamoto san) • 5. Subsystem designs and technologies: VTX, TPC, CAL • What technologies exist, technological challenges, required R&D ..  To R&D Panel (Sugimoto san) • 6. Expected sub-detector performance by Full MC. • Vertex resolution, Tracking Momentum, PFA, etc. (A.M.) • 7. Physics Performance by Full MC • ZH, etc. (Fujii san) Please send inputs (or plan of inputs) by the end of August. Your inputs on other items are equally welcomed. Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

  21. Backup slides Gakujyutsu Sousei Monthly Meeting

More Related