1 / 7

Significance

Significance. It constituted a striking departure from the Supreme Court earlier treatments involving Native Americans. Worcester v. georgia 1832. Worcester vs. Georgia.

solada
Download Presentation

Significance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Significance • It constituted a striking departure from the Supreme Court earlier treatments involving Native Americans.

  2. Worcester v. georgia 1832

  3. Worcester vs. Georgia • In the court case of Worcester vs. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court held in 1832 that the Cherokee Indians constituted a nation holding district sovereign powers. • It did not protect the Cherokees from being removed from ancestral homeland in the Southeast.

  4. The Cherokees • In the 1820s and 1830s, Georgia led a campaign to remove the Cherokees, who had territory within the borders of Georgia, North Carolina, Alabama, and Tennessee. • The Cherokees then established a constitutional government in 1827. • They weren’t just reconstructing their government but declaring to the American public that they were a sovereign nation that could not be removed without their consent.

  5. Samuel Worcester • A Vermont citizen who traveled to the Cherokee nation to pursue his missionary calling. • However, him and six other white peoples were arrested by Georgia officials and removed from the tribal lands. • They were charged for residing without a license or permit and without taking the oath to support and defend the constitution and the laws of Georgia.

  6. Conti. • Worcester defended himself saying he was preaching to the Gospel under the authority of the President of the United States and granted permission from the Cherokee Nation. • He contended that Georgia had no jurisdiction since the U.S. recognized the Cherokee has a sovereign nation. • The Court disagreed and found him and the others guilty and sentenced them to 4 years of hard labor in prison.

  7. Cherokee cited treaties with the federal government. • John Marshall agreed with the Cherokee – said Georgia laws regarding the Cherokee were unconstitutional. • Cherokee a distinct community with their own laws. • Georgia can’t force them to do anything or enter their land without their permission. • Georgia and Jackson ignored this.

More Related