1 / 20

Deaf World, That’s Where I’m At

Deaf World, That’s Where I’m At. A Phenomenological Study Exploring the Experience of Being a Deaf Employee in the Workplace Anita G. Wells October 29, 2007 The University of Memphis. Unique Deaf Culture. Education

slone
Download Presentation

Deaf World, That’s Where I’m At

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Deaf World, That’s Where I’m At A Phenomenological Study Exploring the Experience of Being a Deaf Employee in the Workplace Anita G. Wells October 29, 2007 The University of Memphis

  2. Unique Deaf Culture • Education • Many deaf individuals acquire less than a 4th grade reading level (Bowe, 2003; Paden & Humphries, 1988; Vernon & Andrews, 1990) • Work • For promotions, deaf employees must out-perform hearing employees (Johnson, 1993) • Have difficulty accessing valuable information (Lussier, Say, & Corman, 2000) • Social Needs • Deaf individuals have a strong need to interact with others (Stinson, Whitmire, & Kluwin, 1996; Lussier, Say, & Corman, 2000)

  3. Purpose of the Study • To explore the experiences of four deaf employees in the workplace • What is the essential invariant structure of quality of camaraderie between deaf employees, hearing employees, and supervisors as experienced by deaf participants? • What are the underlying invariant themes and contexts that account for the experiences of the participants?

  4. Theoretical Framework • Social Cognitive Theory: Reciprocal Determinism (Bandura, 1986) Self-Concept

  5. Theoretical Framework • Social Theory of Learning: Communities of Practice (Wenger, 1998) Participation Living in the World Membership Acting Interacting Mutuality

  6. Methods • Phenomenology: Exploring the Lived Experience (Patton, 2002) • Develop a richer and deeper level of understanding of a human problem or social condition (Creswell, 1998; Denzin & Lincoln, 2003) • “How people perceive describe, feel about, judge, remember, and make sense of their experience” (Patton, 2002, p. 104) • Shape a written narrative of meaning for the experience (Creswell, 1998; Denzin & Lincoln, 2003)

  7. Participants • Sampling method • Purposeful (Creswell, 1998) • Had indeed experienced the phenomenon • Homogenous (Miles & Huberman, 1994; Creswell, 1998; Patton, 2002) • All participants had experienced the phenomenon • Criterion based (Patton, 2002) • 18 years old or older • Profound hearing loss before age 2 (Halgin & McEntee, 1986) • Worked at least 18 months in the workplace • ASL is the preferred method of communication

  8. Data Collection Methods 286 PAGES

  9. Data Reduction (Moustakas, 1994) • Interviews transcribed • Data read and re-read • Horizontalizations • Horizons • Clustered Horizons • Themes • Essential Invariant Theme

  10. Data AnalysisMoustakas’ Data Reduction Technique

  11. Invariant Themes • Hitting the Ceiling Quickly and Choosing to Stay Here is where I am going to end up, I ‘m not going to advance

  12. Invariant Theme • Feeling Unvalued in the Workplace I got no voice so I’m a boring person in the meeting

  13. Invariant Theme • Support and Reinforcement Influence Self-Concept I went to school when I was three because of being deaf

  14. Academic Rigor and Trustworthiness • Triangulation (Creswell, 1998) : • Memos – notes to myself in the margins • I think the employer or supervisor in the workplace does not effectively utilize Sherry’s work skills. • Peer debriefing – consulted with professional colleagues • She sort of lives and works in spite of the hearing world around her. • Member checks – through interpreter, shared results of analysis • I didn’t see any problems. That sounds like what I was saying.

  15. Essential Invariant Structure • Incompatible forms of camaraderie between deaf employees and hearing employees. Participation Incidental Communication Self-Concept Participation Self-Concept

  16. Discussion • What Can I claim from this? • The deaf participants do not consider themselves to be full members of the work community • Day-to-day interactions influence feelings of belongingness • Full participation includes being included in the decision making process of the work community • Methodologically • The invisible voice was made more visible • My daughter should love that. I will get her to read this. I want her to understand more about me. This will help out a lot, will be great for her

  17. Limitation of Study • Results cannot be generalized to all deaf employees. • Study does not include the view of supervisors and hearing colleagues

  18. Implications for Practice • Results are useful to numerous individuals • Psychologists • Counseling Psychologists • Human resources • Supervisors • Deaf Employees • Hearing Employees

  19. Implications for Future Research • Replicate current study with younger participants • Explore experiences of deaf employees who have worked in multiple workplaces for short periods of time • Explore experiences of deaf employees who have limited communication skills • Explore experiences of deaf employees in the primary job market

  20. References Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Bowe, F. G. (2003). Transition for deaf and hard-of-hearing students: A blueprint for change. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 485-493. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-129). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications. Johnson, V. A. (1993). Factors impacting the job retention and advancement of workers who are deaf. The Volta Review, 95, 341-356. Lussier, R. N., Say, K., & Corman, J (2000). Need satisfaction of deaf and hearing employees. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 36, 47-61. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Padden, C., & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Stinson, M. S., Whitmire, K., & Kluwin, T. N. (1996). Self-perceptions of social relationships in hearing-impaired adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 132-143. Vernon, M., & Andrews, J. F. (1990). The psychology of deafness: Understanding deaf And hard-of-hearing people. New York, NY: Longman. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

More Related