1 / 9

Making Sense of SLOs: Teacher Expectations/Elective Rating

Making Sense of SLOs: Teacher Expectations/Elective Rating. Teacher Expectations/Elective Rating.

skah
Download Presentation

Making Sense of SLOs: Teacher Expectations/Elective Rating

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Making Sense of SLOs:Teacher Expectations/Elective Rating

  2. Teacher Expectations/Elective Rating • This video is the fifth in a series of five videos created to support the understanding of SLOs. The Teacher Expectations/Elective Ratingvideo addresses Section 5 of the SLO template and will outline the following… • Establishing Levels of Projected Teacher Performance • Factors to Consider/Helpful Hints • Determining the Elective Rating • The documents that support this video are located on the WPAIUCC SLO Moodle (http://bit.ly/slopa)

  3. SLO Template – Section 5

  4. Levels of Projected Performance • The SLO Process allows for a great deal of flexibility and control. • The four Teacher Expectation levels are established by educators prior to the evaluation period. • Each performance level is populated with a percentage ranging from 0% to 100% distributed among all four levels. • The principal and teacher need to have a conversation about how the ranges were established.

  5. Factors to Consider • How do you define proficiency? • Are you satisfied with the % of students meeting proficiency? • What data and decisions did you consider in determining your levels of scores? • Regardless, it is a local decision! • Helpful Hints: • Use historical data, if available, in determining the percentage ranges. • Start with the range for the Proficient level.

  6. Elective Rating/Notes • This element is not completed until after performance data is collected, reviewed and evaluated against each indicator, and in the aggregate, against 5a criteria. • The evaluator then uses the summary of the actual performance data and the percentages specified in 5a to determine the teacher’s resulting performance level. • 5b Notes/Explanation Element provides an opportunity for teachers to offer information.

  7. Elective Rating Example #1 • Individual Performance Indicators: How well did the students do?: • SLO is based on 100 students in eachindicator. • Indicator #1: 75 of your 100 students met the expectation • Indicator #2: 80 of your 100 students met the expectation • Indicator #3: 85 of your 100 students met the expectation

  8. Elective Rating Example #2 • Individual Performance Indicators: How well did the students do?: • SLO is based on 20 students in eachindicator. • Indicator #1: 15 of your 20 students met the expectation • Indicator #2: 18 of your 20 students met the expectation • Indicator #3: 18 of your 20 students met the expectation

  9. SLO Contacts If you need more information regarding SLOs, please contact your IU representative listed below. IU 1: JoBeth McKee IU 3: Paul Cindric IU 4: Cathleen Cubelic, Anthony Conti IU 5: Kirk Shimshock, Linda Lorei, and Jim Gallagher IU 7: Natalie Smith IU 27: Lori Ceremuga, Marsha Hughes and Cristine Wagner-Deitch IU 28: Lynne Snyder

More Related